Home About ATSDR Press Room A-Z Index Glossary Employment Training Contact Us CDC  
ATSDR/DHHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Department of Health and Human Services ATSDR en Español

Search:

Primer Contents
En español
 
Preface
About the Primer
 
Principles & Techniques
 
Why Evaluate?
Types of Evaluation
Evaluation Design
Measure of Effectiveness
Barriers to Evaluation
 
Evaluation & Research
 
Designing and Testing
Review and Pretesting
Pretest Methods
Print Materials
Sample Survey
Group Case Study
Pretest Results
Using Pretest Results
Special Populations
Risk Message Checklist
 
Outcomes & Impacts
 
Assessment Questions
Evaluation Options
Midcourse Reviews
Have We Succeeded?
Evaluation Case Example
Evaluation Action Plan
 
Selected References
 
Risk Documents
 
Cancer Policy
Risk Assessment
Communication Primer
Methyl Parathion
Psychologial Responses
 
ATSDR Resources
 
Case Studies (CSEM)
Exposure Pathways
GATHER (GIS)
HazDat Database
Health Assessments
Health Statements
Interaction Profiles
Interactive Learning
Managing Incidents
Medical Guidelines
Minimal Risk Levels
Priority List
ToxFAQs™
ToxFAQs™ CABS
Toxicological Profiles
Toxicology Curriculum
 
External Resources
 
CDC
eLCOSH
EPA
Healthfinder®
Medline Plus
NCEH
NIEHS
NIOSH
OSHA
 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) 
Evaluation Primer on Health Risk Communication Programs

Attributes of an Effective Risk Communication Program


(Covello, Slovic and von Winterfeldt 1987)

When designing and evaluating communication programs' effectiveness, the following maxims may be helpful.

  • The communication should be clear, understandable, informative, accurate, and concrete.
  • The source of the communication should be perceived as credible and reliable.
  • When the target population is not homogeneous, the message should be presented in several ways, each specifically designed for one segment of the target population.
  • Whenever possible, the target population or representatives of it should be closely involved in the planning and implementation of the program. The earlier the involvement, the better. This advice particularly refers to occupational hazards, where the involvement of unions is considered essential.
  • Multimode presentation is considered to be more effective than single mode presentation. This applies both to mass-media programs and to programs designed for smaller target populations. In the latter situation, face-to-face, two-way communication is also advocated.
  • Feedback about the behavior change and its consequences in lowering risk is highly effective, and should be used whenever possible.
  • Incentives or rewards are thought to be effective in inducing change.
  • Repetitions of the message are desirable to a point; too many repetitions are ineffective or even deleterious. The optimal number of repetitions is not known.
  • Certainly the message should be interesting; vividness has been shown to aid learning. But how arousing should the material be? Research results are mixed concerning the effectiveness of fear arousal.

[Top of Page]


Revised May 1997.