|
LEGEND:
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115172352im_/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/s.gif) |
![PDF Icon](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115172352im_/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/pdficon.gif) |
|
Link to a PDF document |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115172352im_/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/s.gif) |
![Non-CDC Web Link](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115172352im_/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/red.gif) |
|
Link to non-governmental site and does not
necessarily represent the views of the CDC |
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115172352im_/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/s.gif) |
Adobe
Acrobat (TM) Reader needs to be installed on
your computer in order to read documents in PDF format.
Download the Reader.
|
|
![spacer](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115172352im_/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/s.gif) |
![spacer](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115172352im_/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/s.gif) |
![spacer](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115172352im_/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/s.gif) |
![Skip Nav](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115172352im_/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/s.gif)
| ![spacer](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115172352im_/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/s.gif)
HIV/AIDS Surveillance - General Epidemiology (through
2006) |
![spacer](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115172352im_/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/s.gif) |
![spacer](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115172352im_/http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/images/s.gif) |
Please Note: Some slides in this set were
revised on June 28, 2007. For more
information on the reasons for this revision
visit
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/datarevision.htm.
Instructions for downloading and using
HIV/AIDS surveillance slides.
Download the
complete slide set:
While the content is in the public domain and
no copyright restriction applies,
we do ask that users preserve the slides in
their current format and cite CDC as the
source.
![Slide 1: Estimated Number of Adults and Adolescents Living with HIV/AIDS, by Sex, 2003-2006—33 States
From 2003 through 2006 there were increases in the number of adults and adolescents living with HIV/AIDS in the 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance. The increase is due primarily to the widespread use of highly active antiretroviral therapy, introduced in 1996, which has delayed the progression of AIDS to death.
At the end of 2006, an estimated 488,861 adults and adolescents were living with HIV/AIDS; of these, 73% were males and 27% were females.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Data exclude persons who have died and were reported to the HIV/AIDS Reporting System as of December 2006. The data have been adjusted for reporting delays.](images/Slide1.gif)
Slide 1
Estimated Number of Adults and
Adolescents Living with HIV/AIDS, by
Sex, 2003-2006—33 States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Estimated Number of Persons Living with HIV/AIDS, by Race/Ethnicity, 2003-2006-33 States
The estimated number of persons living with HIV/AIDS in 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance increased from 428,107 at the end of 2003 to 491,727 at the end of 2006.
Increases in the number of persons living with HIV/AIDS occurred in all racial/ethnic groups. From 2003 through 2006, the number of non-Hispanic blacks living with HIV/AIDS increased from 202,951 to 231,957; non-Hispanic whites increased from 145,081 to 166,000 and the number of Hispanic persons living with HIV/AIDS increased from 72,612 to 84,720.
(On slide 3, Asians/Pacific Islanders and American Indians/Alaska Natives are shown on a different scale.)
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Data exclude persons who have died and were reported to the HIV/AIDS Reporting System as of December 2006. The data have been adjusted for reporting delays.](images/Slide2.gif)
Slide 2
Estimated Number of Persons Living
with HIV/AIDS, by Race/Ethnicity,
2003-2006—33 States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 3: Estimated Number of Asians/Pacific Islanders and of American Indians/Alaska Natives Living with HIV/AIDS, 2001-2006—33 States
On Slide 2, the estimated number of Asians/Pacific Islanders and American Indians/Alaska Natives living with HIV/AIDS are shown with the other racial/ethnic groups; on this slide, a different scale is used for the vertical axis. From 2003 through 2006, the estimated number of Asians/Pacific Islanders living with HIV/AIDS in 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance increased from 2,234 to 3,187. The estimated number of American Indians/Alaska Natives living with HIV/AIDS in these states increased from 1,788 to 2,119.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Data exclude persons who have died and were reported to the HIV/AIDS Reporting System as of December 2006. The data have
been adjusted for reporting delays.
Slides containing more information on HIV and AIDS in racial and ethnic minorities are available at http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/graphics/minority.htm.](images/Slide3.gif)
Slide 3
Estimated Number of Asians/Pacific
Islanders and of American Indians/Alaska
Natives Living with HIV/AIDS, 2001-2006—33 States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 4: Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases among Adults and Adolescents, by Sex and Transmission Category, 2006—33 States
In 2006, of HIV/AIDS cases diagnosed among male adults and adolescents in 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance, 67% were attributed to male-to-male sexual contact and 12% were attributed to injection drug use. Approximately 16% of cases were attributed to high-risk heterosexual contact and 5% attributed to male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use.
Most (80%) of the HIV/AIDS cases diagnosed among female adults and adolescents were attributed to high-risk heterosexual contact, and 19% were attributed to injection drug use.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
The data have been adjusted for reporting delays and cases without risk factor information were proportionally redistributed.](images/Slide4.gif)
Slide 4
Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases among
Adults and Adolescents, by Sex and
Transmission Category, 2006—33 States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 5: Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases among Adults and Adolescents, by Race/Ethnicity, 2003-2006—33 States
In 2006, of adults and adolescents diagnosed with HIV/AIDS in 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance, 49% were non‑Hispanic black, 31% were non‑Hispanic white, 18% were Hispanic, 1% were Asian/Pacific Islander, and <1% were American Indian/Alaska Native.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
The data have been adjusted for reporting delays.
Slides containing more information on HIV and AIDS in racial and ethnic minorities are available at http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/graphics/minority.htm.](images/Slide5.gif)
Slide 5
Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases among
Adults and Adolescents, by
Race/Ethnicity, 2003-2006—33 States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 6: Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases among Adults and Adolescents, by Transmission Category, 2003-2006—33 States
This slide shows the proportional distribution of HIV/AIDS cases among adults and adolescents diagnosed from 2003 through 2006, by transmission category, for 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance.
The proportion of HIV/AIDS cases attributed to male-to-male sexual contact increased from 45% in 2003 to 50% in 2006. HIV/AIDS cases attributed to injection drug use, high-risk heterosexual contact, and male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use remained stable from 2003 through 2006.
The remaining HIV/AIDS cases were those attributed to hemophilia or the receipt of blood or blood products, and those in persons without an identified risk factor.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
The data have been adjusted for reporting delays and cases without risk factor information were proportionally redistributed.](images/Slide6.gif)
Slide 6
Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases among
Adults and Adolescents, by Transmission
Category, 2003-2006—33 States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 7: Estimated Number and Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases among Adults and Adolescents, by Transmission Category, 2006-33 States
This slide shows the distribution of transmission categories for HIV/AIDS cases diagnosed in 2006 in 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance.
Approximately 50% of the 35,180 HIV/AIDS cases diagnosed in 2006 among adults and adolescents were attributed to male-to-male sexual contact. An additional 3% of HIV/AIDS diagnoses were attributed to male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use.
Injection drug use accounted for 13% of HIV/AIDS diagnoses, and high-risk heterosexual contact accounted for 33%.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
The data have been adjusted for reporting delays and cases without risk factor information were proportionally redistributed.](images/Slide7.gif)
Slide 7
Estimated Number and Proportion of
HIV/AIDS Cases among Adults and
Adolescents, by Transmission Category,
2006—33 States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 8: Estimated Number and Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases Attributed to Male-to-Male Sexual Contact, by Race/Ethnicity, 2006—33 States
In 2006, an estimated 17,465 HIV/AIDS cases diagnosed in 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance were attributed to male-to-male sexual contact.
Almost half of the cases associated with male-to-male sexual contact were in non-Hispanic whites (41%). Most of the remaining cases were in non-Hispanic blacks (38%) or Hispanics (19%). Asians/Pacific Islanders and American Indians/Alaska Natives each accounted for 1% of cases.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
The data have been adjusted for reporting delays and cases without risk factor information were proportionally redistributed.](images/Slide8.gif)
Slide 8
Estimated Number and Proportion of
HIV/AIDS Cases Attributed to
Male-to-Male Sexual Contact, by
Race/Ethnicity, 2006—33 States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 9: Estimated Number and Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases among Adults and Adolescents Attributed to High-Risk Heterosexual Contact, by Race/Ethnicity, 2006—33 States
In 2006, an estimated 11,584 HIV/AIDS cases diagnosed in 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance were attributed to high-risk heterosexual contact.
More than half of the cases associated with high-risk heterosexual contact were in non-Hispanic blacks (66%). Most of the remaining cases were in non-Hispanic whites (16%) or Hispanics (17%). Asians/Pacific Islanders accounted for 1% of cases and American Indians/Alaska Natives accounted for less than 1% of all cases.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
The data have been adjusted for reporting delays and cases without risk factor information were proportionally redistributed.](images/Slide9.gif)
Slide 9
Estimated Number and Proportion of
HIV/AIDS Cases among Adults and
Adolescents Attributed to High-Risk
Heterosexual Contact, by Race/Ethnicity,
2006—33 States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 10: Estimated Number and Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases Attributed to Male-to-Male Sexual Contact and Injection Drug Use, by Race/Ethnicity, 2006—33 States
In 2006, an estimated 1,180 HIV/AIDS cases diagnosed in 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance were attributed to male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use.
The majority of cases associated with male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use were in non-Hispanic whites (42%) and non-Hispanic blacks (37%). Most of the remaining cases were in Hispanics (18%). Asians/Pacific Islanders and American Indians/Alaska Natives each accounted for 1% of all cases.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
The data have been adjusted for reporting delays and cases without risk factor information were proportionally redistributed.](images/Slide10.gif)
Slide 10
Estimated Number and Proportion of
HIV/AIDS Cases Attributed to
Male-to-Male Sexual Contact and
Injection Drug Use, by Race/Ethnicity,
2006—33 States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 11: Estimated Number and Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases Attributed to Injection Drug Use, by Race/Ethnicity, 2006—33 States
In 2006, an estimated 4,728 HIV/AIDS cases diagnosed in 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance were attributed to injection drug use.
More than half of the cases associated with injection drug use were in non-Hispanic blacks (53%). Most of the remaining cases were in non-Hispanic whites (26%) or Hispanics (19%). American Indians/Alaska Natives and Asians/Pacific Islanders each accounted for 1% of all cases.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
The data have been adjusted for reporting delays and cases without risk factor information were proportionally redistributed.](images/Slide11.gif)
Slide 11
Estimated Number and Proportion of
HIV/AIDS Cases Attributed to Injection
Drug Use, by Race/Ethnicity, 2006—33 States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 12: Estimated Number of HIV/AIDS Cases and Rates for Male Adults and Adolescents, by Race/Ethnicity, 2006—33 States
This slide shows diagnosis rates for HIV/AIDS cases among male adults and adolescents residing in 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance.
For male adults and adolescents, the rate (HIV/AIDS cases per 100,000) for non-Hispanic blacks (119.1) was 7 times higher than for non-Hispanic whites (16.7) and more than twice as high as the rate for Hispanics (50.9).
Relatively few cases were diagnosed among Asian/Pacific Islander and American Indian/Alaska Native males, although the rate for American Indian/Alaska Native males (17.7) was higher than that for non-Hispanic white males.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection reporting since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
The data have been adjusted for reporting delays.](images/Slide12.gif)
Slide 12
Estimated Number of HIV/AIDS Cases
and Rates for Male Adults and
Adolescents, by Race/Ethnicity, 2006—33
States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 13: Estimated Number of HIV/AIDS Cases and Rates for Female Adults and Adolescents, by Race/Ethnicity, 2006-33 States
This slide shows diagnosis rates for HIV/AIDS cases among female adults and adolescents residing in 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance.
For female adults and adolescents, the rate (HIV/AIDS cases per 100,000) for non-Hispanic blacks (56.2) was nearly 20 times higher than that for non-Hispanic whites (2.9).
The estimated number of HIV/AIDS cases diagnosed in 2006 was similar for Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites, but the rate for Hispanics (15.1) was more than 5 times higher than the rate for non-Hispanic whites.
Relatively few cases were diagnosed among Asian/Pacific Islander and American Indian/Alaska Native females, although the rates for both groups were higher than the rate for non-Hispanic white females.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection reporting since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
The data have been adjusted for reporting delays.](images/Slide13.gif)
Slide 13
Estimated Number of HIV/AIDS Cases
and Rates for Female Adults and
Adolescents, by Race/Ethnicity, 2006—33
States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 14: Estimated Prevalence Rates for Adults and Adolescents Living with HIV Infection (not AIDS), 2006—33 States and 5 U.S. Dependent Areas
For adults and adolescents living with HIV/AIDS, prevalence rates per 100,000 population are shown for 33 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance.
Areas with the highest prevalence rates in 2006 were New York, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Florida, New Jersey, and Louisiana.
The following 33 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
The data have been adjusted for reporting delays.](images/Slide14.gif)
Slide 14
Estimated Prevalence Rates for
Adults and Adolescents Living with HIV
Infection (not AIDS), 2006—33 States and
5 U.S. Dependent Areas
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 15: Estimated Prevalence Rates for Children <13 Years of Age Living with HIV Infection (not AIDS), 2006—33 States and 5 U.S. Dependent Areas
For children living with HIV/AIDS, prevalence rates per 100,000 population are shown for 33 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance.
Areas with the highest prevalence rates in 2006 were New York, Louisiana, New Jersey, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
The following 33 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
The data have been adjusted for reporting delays.](images/Slide15.gif)
Slide 15
Estimated Prevalence Rates for
Children <13 Years of Age Living with
HIV Infection (not AIDS), 2006—33 States and
5 U.S. Dependent Areas
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 16: Year of Initiation of Confidential Name-Based HIV Case Surveillance as of December 2007
In 2006, 52,878 cases of HIV infection (not AIDS) were reported to CDC from 45 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance. California, Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Washington reported the largest number of cases of HIV infection.
In 2006, the following 45 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas conducted HIV case surveillance and reported cases of HIV infection in adults, adolescents, and children to CDC: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Note. Because states initiated confidential name-based HIV infection reporting on different dates, the length of time reporting has been in place influences the number cases reported in a given year. For example, California, Illinois and Washington switched from code-based to name-based reporting in 2006. The high numbers of cases reported from these areas in 2006 are most likely due to an influx of previously diagnosed cases into the name-based system. As time passes and name-based reporting stabilizes, the annual numbers should decrease for these areas.](images/Slide16.gif)
Slide 16
Year of Initiation of Confidential
Name-Based HIV Case Surveillance as of
December 2007
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 17: Reported Cases of HIV Infection (not AIDS), 2006—45 States and 5 U.S. Dependent Areas N=52,878
In 2006, 52,878 cases of HIV infection (not AIDS) were reported to CDC from 45 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance. California, Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Washington reported the largest number of cases of HIV infection.
In 2006, the following 45 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas conducted HIV case surveillance and reported cases of HIV infection in adults, adolescents, and children to CDC: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Note. Because states initiated confidential name-based HIV infection reporting on different dates, the length of time reporting has been in place influences the number cases reported in a given year. For example, California, Illinois and Washington switched from code-based to name-based reporting in 2006. The high numbers of cases reported from these areas in 2006 are most likely due to an influx of previously diagnosed cases into the name-based system. As time passes and name-based reporting stabilizes, the annual numbers should decrease for these areas.](images/Slide17.gif)
Slide 17
Reported Cases of HIV Infection (not
AIDS), 2006—45 States and 5 U.S.
Dependent Areas N=52,878
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 18: Adolescents 13-19 Years of Age Reported to be Living with HIV Infection (not AIDS), 2006—45 States and 5 U.S. Dependent Areas N=3,808
At the end of 2006, a total of 3,808 adolescents, 13–19 years of age were reported to be living with HIV infection (not AIDS) in 45 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance.
In 2006, the following 45 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas conducted HIV case surveillance and reported cases of HIV infection in adults, adolescents, and children to CDC: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Data exclude persons who have died and were reported to the HIV/AIDS Reporting System as of December 2006.](images/Slide18.gif)
Slide 18
Adolescents 13-19 Years of Age
Reported to be Living with HIV Infection
(not AIDS), 2006—45 States and 5 U.S.
Dependent Areas N=3,808
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 19: Reported Cases of HIV Infection (not AIDS), by Age Group at Diagnosis, Cumulative through 2006—45 States and 5 U.S. Dependent Areas
Cumulative through December 2006, a total of 287,954 persons with HIV infection (not AIDS) had been reported from the 45 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance; 65% of these persons were aged 25-44 years at the time of diagnosis.
In 2006, the following 45 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas conducted HIV case surveillance and reported cases of HIV infection in adults, adolescents, and children to CDC: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.](images/Slide19.gif)
Slide 19
Reported Cases of HIV Infection (not
AIDS), by Age Group at Diagnosis,
Cumulative through 2006—45 States and
5 U.S. Dependent Areas
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 20: Reported Cases of HIV Infection (not AIDS) in Children <13 Years of Age at Diagnosis, 2006—45 States and 5 U.S. Dependent Areas N=566
In 2006, a total of 566 cases of HIV infection (not AIDS) in children younger than 13 years of age were reported from 45 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance. Most (80%) of these cases were perinatally acquired. Illinois, California, and New York reported the largest number of cases.
In 2006, the following 45 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas conducted HIV case surveillance and reported cases of HIV infection in adults, adolescents, and children to CDC: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Note. Because states initiated confidential name-based HIV infection reporting on different dates, the length of time reporting has been in place influences the number cases reported in a given year. For example, California, Illinois, and Washington switched from code-based to name-based reporting in 2006. The high numbers of cases reported from these areas in 2006 are most likely due to an influx of previously diagnosed cases into the name-based system. As time passes and name-based reporting stabilizes, the annual numbers should decrease for these areas.](images/Slide20.gif)
Slide 20
Reported Cases of HIV Infection (not
AIDS) in Children <13 Years of Age at
Diagnosis, 2006—45 States and 5 U.S.
Dependent Areas N=566
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 21: Reported Cases of HIV Infection (not AIDS) by Age Group and Sex, Cumulative through 2006—45 States and 5 U.S. Dependent Areas
Through December 2006, a total of 287,954 cases of HIV infection (not AIDS) had been reported to CDC from 45 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas with confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance: 71% were in males and 29% in females. Most of the cases were diagnosed when the men and women were 25-44 years of age.
In 2006, the following 45 states and 5 U.S. dependent areas conducted HIV case surveillance and reported cases of HIV infection in adults, adolescents, and children to CDC: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.](images/Slide21.gif)
Slide 21
Reported Cases of HIV Infection (not
AIDS) by Age Group and Sex, Cumulative
through 2006—45 States and 5 U.S.
Dependent Areas
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
![Slide 22: Estimated Diagnosis Rates of HIV/AIDS for Adults and Adolescents, 2006—33 States
In the 33 states with confidential name-based HIV infection reporting, the diagnosis rate of HIV/AIDS among adults and adolescents was 22.4 per 100,000 population in 2006. The rate for adults and adolescents diagnosed with HIV/AIDS ranged from 2.3 per 100,000 in Wyoming to 42.6 per 100,000 in Florida.
The following 33 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection surveillance since at least 2003: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.
The data have been adjusted for reporting delays.](images/Slide22.gif)
Slide 22
Estimated Diagnosis Rates of
HIV/AIDS for Adults and Adolescents,
2006—33 States
PDF
File
or
PPT
File |
|
|
|
|