Gila, and Tahono O’Odham take the lead for Hohokam area. Hopi follow along.
Hopi & Hualapai need to do something similar, especially along the Colorado
river. Its workable.
Jackson - NAGPRA resolutions on what to do, then agreement with Havasupai &
Hualapai as what to do.
Brunson - Bring up issues hear from other businesses. Project to impact site,
do tribes know where sacred sites are? Not always. Why not? Should create own
records and maps of TCPs. This would allow for quicker response and what to
do.
Anyon - Agree with above. Location in oral tradition not necessarily important
to have X marks the spot. Hard to put on paper even in tribal hands. In some
cases sites only known to select few and should not be made “public” even to
other tribal members.
Pilles - Also boundaries of TCPs hard to pin down.
Ferguson - Difference between consultation and decision making.
LUNCH (12:10-1:20 PM)
Dinner announcement
Two new people, Dr. JJ Reid of U of A, Dr. Christian Downum of NAU. Brought
them up to date as to what happened during the morning.
Mills - Wants to see consultation process streamlined!
Pilles - Who does consult, when consult, who pays.
Laidlaw - What is the product of consultation; goals.
Jenkins - Confidentiality issues.
|
Initiation - B
|
Look Forward - A & C
|
|
Informed - B
|
Funding - B
|
|
Agency Consistent
Contact- A, B
|
Federal Perception - B
|
|
Contact - A
|
Programmatic - A, C, D
|
|
Places
Responsibility of Tribes - B
|
Role of Archaeologist- B, C, D
|
|
Different Stages -
A
|
Jurisdiction:Tribal - A,B,C,D
|
|
Contact per Tribe - B
|
Determination - C, D
|
|
Tribes Consult With - B
|
How to mitigate - C
|
|
Tribe Individuality - A
|
Following
Sec. 106 - A, D
|
|
Agency Deals - A, B
|
Tribes Asked - B, C
|
|
Too Much Paper - A, B
|
Conflict of Issues - B, D
|