Archive of Prominent Section 106 Cases: Selected Cases, 1986-1996
|
Introduction to Selected 1986-1996 Cases
Mid-Atlantic cases
Midwest cases
North-Central cases
Northeast cases
Northwest/Alaska cases
Rocky Mountain cases
South-Central cases
Southeast cases
West-Pacific cases
|
Selected Section 106 Cases, 1986-1996
The centerpiece of the Section 106 review process is
consultation, which typically involves Federal and State
officials, most notably the SHPO, elected officials, project
sponsors, the public, and the Council as needed. The goal of
consultation is always a solution that balances project benefits
with historic values in the public interest. Under ideal
circumstances, proposed projects protect and enhance these
values; however, circumstances are seldom ideal. It is the
Council's role to ensure that a reasonable balance is struck
between project requirements and historic preservation needs,
that the public broadly defined is best served.
Toward this end,
the Council continually emphasizes the active involvement of
individuals and organizations, local governments, recipients of
Federal assistance or permits, Indian tribes, and property
owners, among others, in the consultation process. The
Council-administered Section 106 review process gives citizens a
unique chance to participate in Federal decisionmaking about
community resources; it is vital that they avail themselves of
this opportunity.
The cases at left, selected from the Council's archives, showcase
the importance of public participation in Section 106
consultation and the cooperative nature of the review process in
general. Reflecting the diversity of undertakings that come under
the Council's purview, they exemplify how development issues can
be practically resolved so as to enable worthwhile projects to
proceed safe from legal challenge. They provide insight into how
practical, cost-effective solutions are developed and implemented
and demonstrate how Federal agency needs can be reconciled with
historic preservation objectives.
More than anything else, they
underscore the importance of the early initiation of Section 106
consultation. As case after case illustrates, when Section 106
review is initiated during the early stages of a project, the
widest possible range of mitigation options is available, and
chances for a resolution acceptable to all parties are greatly
enhanced. Conversely, when the review process is invoked after
vital project decisions have been made, mitigation options
diminish, sometimes severely, and consultation may become
unnecessarily complicated and protracted. These casesdrawn from across the countryrepresent the range of Federal agencies and activities the Council regularly encounters.
Return to top of page
|