Return to Case Digest Archives
Archive of Prominent Section 106 Cases:
March 2000

Introduction

Criteria for
Involvement

Arizona:
Grand Canyon

California: Gold Mine
(Imperial County)

California: Marine
Corps Air Station
(Tustin)

Florida: Rowland Subdivision
(Okeechobee)

Georgia: Fort Benning/City of Columbus

Hawaii:
Pearl Harbor

Kansas: Eisenhower Medical Center
(Leavenworth)

New Jersey: Textile Printing Site
(Paterson)

Virginia:
Chancellorsville
Battlefield

Virginia-Maryland: Woodrow Wilson Bridge

Return to Archive of Prominent Section 106 Cases

Archive of Prominent Section 106 Cases:
March 2000

Application of the Council's
Criteria for Involvement

 Under the Council’s regulations, the Council may enter the Section 106 process when it determines that its involvement is necessary to ensure that the purposes of Section 106 and the National Historic Preservation Act are met. Its decision to do so must be guided by specific criteria that are set forth in Appendix A of the regulations. The Council is likely to enter the Section 106 process when an undertaking:
  • has substantial impacts on important historic properties
    (Criterion 1);
  • presents important questions of policy or interpretation
    (Criterion 2);
  • has the potential for presenting procedural problems
    (Criterion 3); and/or
  • presents issues of concern to Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations (Criterion 4).
Return to top of page

ACHP home page Working with Section 106

We welcome your feedback