Home About ATSDR Press Room A-Z Index Glossary Employment Training Contact Us CDC  
ATSDR/DHHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Department of Health and Human Services ATSDR en Español

Search:

Case Contents
 
Cover Page
Goals and Objectives
Case Study, Pretest
Who is at Risk
Exposure Pathways
Physiologic Effects
Radon Detection
Radon Abatement
Standards, Regulations
Suggested Reading
Answers
Sources of Information
 
Case Studies (CSEM)
 
CSEM Home
Continuing Education
Online Registration
 
ATSDR Resources
 
Case Studies (CSEM)
Exposure Pathways
GATHER (GIS)
Health Assessments
Health Statements
Interaction Profiles
Interactive Learning
Managing Incidents
Medical Guidelines
Minimal Risk Levels
Priority List
ToxFAQs™
ToxFAQs™ CABS
Toxicological Profiles
Toxicology Curriculum
 
External Resources
 
CDC
eLCOSH
EPA
Healthfinder®
Medline Plus
NCEH
NIEHS
NIOSH
OSHA
 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Radon Toxicity
Treatment and Management


  • Generally, the most effective methods to reduce the risk of lung cancer are smoking cessation and radon mitigation.

No effective communitywide screening methods are available for medical prevention or early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer (radon-induced or otherwise). Routine chest radiographs and sputum cytology are ineffective for screening lung cancer associated with cigarette smoking and would presumably be ineffective for screening lung cancer associated with radon as well. The most effective methods of prevention are reduction of radon exposure and modification of other simultaneous risk factors for lung cancer, such as smoking. The only long-term solution for reducing the risk of  lung cancer is smoking cessation, coupled with detection and mitigation of high radon levels.

  • The potential risk of cancer due to radon is often underestimated by the public; this bias might discourage assessment and abatement measures in the home.

Several studies have noted optimistic biases in the public's assessment of the risk due to radon. A New Jersey study found that this bias might discourage testing and subsequent implementation of control measures. In Maine, homeowners were found to greatly underestimate the potential risk, and abatement behavior was not significantly related to potential risk.

Primary care physicians and public health professionals should promote public awareness so that the radon problem is seen in the proper perspective, leading to appropriate mitigation action when indicated. Physicians and public health officials should therefore test their own homes and offices to relate their experience to others and to provide guidance on how to carry out the testing.


Previous Section

Next Section

Revised 2000-06-30.