History - William B. Greeley, Third Chief, 1920-1928

History Home > Leadership Time Line > Greeley

Greeley was able to put into actual practice the national forest policy that was inaugurated by Henry Graves. After Greeley was appointed chief, he faced a number of challenges, including the acquisition of new national forests east of the Mississippi River; making cooperation with private, state, and other federal agencies a standard feature of Forest Service management; fighting renewed efforts to place the Forest Service back into the Department of the Interior; and "blocking up" the national forests (exchange or purchase of lands inside or near the forest boundaries to simplify management). During his administration the Clarke McNary Act of 1924 became law which extended federal authority to purchase forest lands and to enter into agreements with various states to help protect state and private forests from wildfire. This was also the time, during the "roaring twenties," when prosperity brought about tremendous growth in recreation on the national forests which led to the need to develop and improve roads for automobile use, campgrounds for forest visitors, and summer home sites for semi permanent users.

William B. Greeley wrote: The national forests are no longer primeval solitudes remote from the economic life of developing regions, or barely touched by the skirmish line of settlement. To a very large degree the wilderness has been pressed back. Farms have multiplied, roads have been built, frontier hamlets have grown into villages and towns, industries have found foothold and expanded. Although the forests are still in an early stage of economic development, their resources are important factors in present prosperity.

There is probably no large area of forest land in the world on which the use and conservation of multiple resources have been so thoroughly studied or so completely developed in practice as on the national forests of the United States....Nothing better illustrates the democracy of the American forest policy or the decentralization in administering national forests than the conscientious effort of the Forest Service to weight the importance of different uses on each unit and to give every use its merited place in a bewildering regimen of administrative detail.