![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041625im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041625im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041625im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041625im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
TABLE 3. Top 3 Destination and Origin Ports for International Waterborne Freight via Port of Los Angeles, 2003
(Short tons, thousands)
Excel | CSV
1 |
Hong Kong,
Hong Kong |
1,356 |
2 |
Kao
Hsiung, China Taiwan |
1,253 |
3 |
Singapore,
Singapore |
973 |
|
1 |
Hong Kong, Hong Kong |
2,838 |
2 |
Kao Hsiung, China Taiwan |
2,618 |
3 |
Yantian, China Mainland |
2,392 |
|
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, based on data from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, preliminary 2003 Foreign Cargo Data, October 2004.
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041625im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041625im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041625im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041625im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |