![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041827im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041827im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041827im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041827im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
TABLE 3. Top 3 Destination and Origin Ports for International Waterborne Freight via Port of Long Beach, 2003
(Short tons, thousands)
Excel | CSV
1 |
Pusan,
South Korea |
1,426 |
2 |
Hong
Kong, Hong Kong |
1,230 |
3 |
Singapore,
Singapore |
875 |
|
1 |
Hong Kong, Hong Kong |
3,302 |
2 |
Yantian, China Mainland |
2,730 |
3 |
Pusan, South Korea |
2,427 |
|
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, based on data from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, preliminary 2003 Foreign Cargo Data, October 2004.
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041827im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041827im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041827im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115041827im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |