![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115050307im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115050307im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115050307im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115050307im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
TABLE 3. Top 3 Destination and Origin Ports for International Waterborne Freight via Port of Charleston, 2003
(Short tons, thousands)
Excel | CSV
1 |
Bremerhaven,
Germany |
560 |
2 |
Rotterdam,
Netherlands |
516 |
3 |
Antwerp,
Belgium |
509 |
|
1 |
Ponta da Madeira, Brazil |
813 |
2 |
Bremerhaven, Germany |
776 |
3 |
Rotterdam, Netherlands |
652 |
|
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, based on data from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, preliminary 2003 Foreign Cargo Data, October 2004.
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115050307im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115050307im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115050307im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090115050307im_/https://www.bts.gov/images/spacer.gif) |