skip navigation
Text Size small medium large  

skip navigation
Federal Statutes
Major Orders & Regulations
Administrative Litigation
Court Cases
Complaints
Settlements

Accounting Matters
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Available Settlements Judges
Dispute Resolution Service
Comparison of DRS and Enforcement Hotline
Continuum of Dispute Resolution Approaches
Benefits of the ADR Process
Is ADR Appropriate for my Dispute?
News
CEII/FOIA
No Fear Act
 
 


Legal Resources

Comparison of DRS and Enforcement Hotline
    There are both similarities and differences between the Enforcement Hotline and the DRS.

    Similarities

    The main similarity is that certain disputes can be addressed effectively by either the Enforcement Hotline or the DRS. These include:

    • Tariff disputes; or


    • Landowner/pipeline disagreements that are raised before a dispute is filed with the Commission.

    In these situations, a complainant may contact either section for assistance.

    Differences

    There are two main distinctions between the Enforcement Hotline and the DRS:

    1. The Hotline can address complaints and questions up to the time a matter is filed with the Commission. Once a formal complaint or other proceeding is initiated before the Commission, the Hotline staff may not be involved.

      On the other hand, the DRS may address a dispute at any time – prior to or after a matter is filed with the Commission. This is because the DRS staff is not involved in the investigation, trial or decision-making regarding any case. The DRS staff is not subject to rules prohibiting off-the-record communications between and among parties; however, it is subject to separation of functions rules (i.e., the DRS staff may not communicate substantive matters in any of its proceedings with non–DRS staff).


    2. The Hotline staff members are investigators who will try to advise callers on questions or attempt to address disputes in the marketplace, either informally through mediation or early neutral evaluation or formally through other traditional enforcement remedies. While they are trained in conflict resolution, there may be times when they will side with one of the disputing parties. The Hotline staff will research Commission precedent or explore the issues with technical or other legal staff, as needed. The Hotline staff’s evaluations are not binding on the Commission. Rather, the staff offers an advisory opinion as to the settlement value of and the potential outcome of the case, as well as a recommended course of action. Hotline contacts are confidential. However, the Hotline staff may refer a matter for investigation if significant issues meriting Commission review are demonstrated.

    Anyone who is unsure whether a matter should be addressed by the Hotline or the DRS may contact either unit. If the matter is not appropriate for that section, the staff representative will refer the matter to the proper unit.


  Contact Information

Richard Miles, Director
Telephone: 202-502-8702
E-mail: Richard.Miles@ferc.gov

Dispute Resolution Specialists:

Deborah Osborne, Manager
Telephone: 202-502-8831
E-mail: deborah.osborne@ferc.gov

Jerrilynne Purdy
Telephone: 202-502-8671
E-mail: Jerrilynne.Purdy@ferc.gov

Deirdre McCarthy Gallagher
Telephone: 202-502-8078
E-mail: Deirdre.Gallagher@ferc.gov

Renée Perry, Program Assistant Telephone: 202-502-8006
E-mail: Renee.Perry@ferc.gov

Toll Free Helpline
Toll-free: 1-877-337-2237
FAX: 202-219-2730
Email: ferc.adr@ferc.gov
 

  Additional Information

 



Updated: June 2, 2008