National Biospecimen Network - National Cancer Institute - Intranet
HomeNBN BlueprintAbout the PilotIntranetCalendarPublicationsContacts
You are here: Home > NBN Blueprint > Why the National Biospecimen Network?

 
Table of Contents
 
       MODULES
Why the National Biospecimen Network?
Management of Ethical and Legal Considerations
Biospecimen and Data Collection and Distribution
Bioinformatics and Data Management
Communications
Governance and Business Models
National Biospecimen Network and Public Health
Demonstration Project

PDF Document Full NBN Blueprint Report
(PDF Document - 7,237 kb)
 
Public Comments

   

NBN Blueprint
Why the National Biospecimen Network?

This module presents the rationale for the National Biospecimen Network (NBN) system, describes how it is expected to differ from extant tissue resources, and identifies the resource requirements and challenges associated with the development of an NBN that will be of maximum utility to researchers. This module focuses primarily on researcher needs, and seeks to provide detailed requirements for key components of the NBN. Recommendations for implementation are discussed in subsequent modules.

1.1 Background

Participants in the groundbreaking National Dialogue on Cancer (NDC) Research Team Forum I held in March 2002 identified access to appropriately collected and annotated tissue as a critical need for fully capitalizing on new genomic and proteomic technologies to accelerate progress against cancer.1 The group identified the lack of such access as one of the major barriers to realizing the promise of developing targeted cancer diagnostics, preventives, and therapies. The opinions expressed at the Forum I meeting echoed previous public comments of prominent researchers, and the conclusions of several advisory committee reports to the NCI in a variety of cancer research areas, including brain tumor, leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma, lung cancer, and gynecologic cancers.2

Several recent examples illustrate how access to relatively large numbers of tissue samples has played a pivotal role in oncology drug development, and these examples underscore the likely benefits from implementing a standardized system by which researchers and clinicians may gain access to biospecimens and associated data. The development of trastuzumab (Herceptin®) is a success story that demonstrates the potential of biomarkers in the rational design and development of cancer drugs that could not have been realized without access to tissue samples. The clinical benefits of trastuzumab would almost certainly have been insufficient for FDA approval if the agent had been tested in unselected patient populations (Appendix A). The Gleevec® story demonstrates how alternative uses for a drug can be discovered through investigations conducted with tissue samples. Gleevec® originally was developed for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. However, screening of tissue samples for c-kit activation identified gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients as potential clinical benefactors (see Appendix B). Finally, as researchers unravel links between molecular pathways and specific cancers and treatments, thereby discovering yet untold uses for many existing therapies, standardization of tissue collection and analysis will become increasingly important for linking various independent observations. Tissue samples played a pivotal role in the development of laser capture microdissection, a breakthrough technique that facilitates the precise, reproducible, and accurate transfer of tissues for analysis (see Appendix C).

In response to the challenge articulated by the NDC Research Team—a self-selected group of individuals involved in cancer research, drug development, delivery, and commercialization, as well as representatives from patient advocacy organizations—met in Washington, D.C. on August 26-27, 2002, on January 7, 2003, and again as part of the NDC Forum II meeting on March 5-7, 2003, to further investigate the barriers involved in tissue access and to explore possible avenues for improvement. This group, the NDC Tissue Access Working Group (TAWG), sought to design an approach that could meet the Nation’s research needs for biological specimens, and to present options for moving forward. It was at the Forum II meeting that Cathy Ratcliffe from the National Translational Cancer Research Network (NTRAC) presented the United Kingdom (UK) experience with the development of their National Cancer Tissue Resource (NCTR), and TAWG members were provided a copy of the NCTR strategic plan.3 The UK experience effectively accelerated the United States. Blueprint development process by several months.

During their deliberations, the NDC TAWG members reinforced the conclusion that the development of a national tissue resource, although ambitious, is necessary to realize the promise of genomics and proteomics for the prevention and cure of cancer and other diseases. Unparalleled advances in dissecting the genetic changes and molecular mechanisms that ultimately produce cancer have provided, for the first time, compelling reasons to pursue targetspecific interventions. It is now well-recognized that there is a high degree of disease heterogeneity, that sample characteristics and preparation will impact results, and that large samples are required for robust design and rigorous conclusions. To reflect this understanding, the NDC TAWG defined its goal as:

"to establish a national, pre-competitive, regulatory compliant and geneticprivacy protected, standardized, inclusive, highest quality network of biological sample(s) banks; supported by and developed via novel financial and other partnerships with cancer survivors and advocates, the private sector and nonprofit organizations as appropriate; that is shared, readily accessible, and searchable using state-of-the-art informatics systems (e.g., amenable to molecular profiling capability)."4

Building on the ideas and vision shaped by the NDC TAWG, an effort was initiated to create a Design and Engineering Blueprint for an NBN (the "NBN Blueprint"), a biospecimen resource envisioned for optimizing and accelerating the development of new interventions for cancer. The major goals of the NBN Design Team were to articulate the unmet needs that the NBN seeks to address, to clarify the NBN customer base, including the role of patients and advocates as well as commercial interests, and to describe the desired processes that the NBN would engage in to meet its goals. The Design Team met in Bethesda, MD on May 28, 2003, to achieve a collective understanding of the purpose of the NBN Blueprint document and the process for its development, to agree on the objectives, key questions, issues, concerns, and types of recommendations to be addressed in each module, and to agree on a general framework for completing the NBN Blueprint. The May 28 meeting also gave participants an opportunity to discuss the challenges (including institutional and other barriers) as well as opportunities to integrate with and adopt best practices from existing systems in the United States and from the UK’s NCTR model.

The NBN Design Team’s deliberations were enhanced by site visits in May 2003 to tissue resource operations considered to provide state-of-the-art facilities with optimal data access processes as well as an intense period of conference calls during the months of June-August involving the Design Team members and advisors for each particular module topic. The NBN Design Team also benefited from the RAND evaluation of selected existing tissue resources: an exercise that included description of the types of tissue users and distribution practices, and queries to ongoing tissue resource managers of any unmet needs or quality control (QC) issues (see Appendix D for interview instrument). A questionnaire was administered at the American Association for Cancer Research meeting in Washington, D.C. in July 2003 that collected information from meeting participants about their anticipated uses for and reactions to the development of the NBN, as well as their willingness to pay (see Appendix E). This information also assisted the Design Team in their deliberations.

On July 28-29, 2003, the NBN Design Team and invited experts convened to discuss overarching issues, integration of the modules, and final recommendations that should appear in the Blueprint. (See Appendix F for the list of participants to the July 28-29 NBN Blueprint meeting.) Earlier versions of this Blueprint have undergone extensive review by outside experts selected by Constella Health Sciences in consultation with the sponsors, to help ensure the accuracy and relevancy of information provided in this report and to capture the broadest representation possible from diverse viewpoints.

The Design Team identified five primary areas where the NBN could bring value to researchers: (1) Standardized collection of large numbers of fresh/frozen cancer specimens; (2) Accurate, highly standardized clinical annotation and associated data; (3) Prompt and equitable specimen accessibility; (4) Informatics platforms to facilitate sharing of data and results; and (5) Protection of patient privacy. Items one and two specifically address the variation in collection procedures and annotation that currently inhibits uniform comparisons among tissue collections, and items three and four address the frustration expressed by many researchers and advocacy groups about the lack of biospecimen resource sharing.5

Additionally, the Design Team envisioned the NBN as serving a number of well-defined niches for researchers. Full implementation of the NBN might well see centralized, advanced analyses of a subset of specimens, as well as the collection of standardized longitudinal data for a high percentage of specimens. Not all researchers will have the same needs; thus, some subsets of samples will be accompanied by more extensive longitudinal data, while other subsets will have undergone one or more types of advanced analyses; combinations of these subsets also will exist. However, all specimens should be characterized by the major areas of value outlined above.

Top of Page

1.2 Purpose of the National Biospecimen Network

The NBN is envisioned to be the first national, standardized tissue resource in the United States designed to facilitate genomic and proteomic research, with open access to cancer researchers across the country. Although several countries—including the UK6, Iceland,7 and Japan 8—are investing in nationally coordinated specimen collection, banking, and dissemination systems specifically designed to support genomic and proteomic research, no effort has been attempted on a comparable scale in the United States.

The NBN can facilitate a range of scientific activities that could lead to new genomic- and proteomic-based interventions for cancer, including target identification and validation, the development of new biomarkers and diagnostics, and pharmacogenomic analyses. Recent breakthroughs in the biomedical sciences have produced a wealth of new knowledge about the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cancer. Biospecimens, which historically have been a key element of cancer research,9 have now assumed a central position in the application of genomic technologies to new interventions for cancer. As researchers unravel the roles of particular biomarkers and cellular pathways in specific cancers, biospecimens will help link observations from the laboratory to disease processes observed in the physiological setting.

As shown in Figure 1-1, the NBN is designed to provide a link between epidemiological investigations that identify genetic and environmental risk factors and clinical trials that directly test new interventions for cancer. Several existing efforts fall within the scope of the sectors shown in Figure 1-1. For example, the UK Biobank, Biobank Japan, and DeCode Genetics in Iceland support large-scale genetic epidemiology efforts, whereas the U.S. Cooperative Oncology Groups collect many biospecimens in the context of clinical trials.10 A recent initiative to develop an NCTR in the UK shares several key elements with the NBN concept. As discussed further in an accompanying report on "best practices,"11 several existing repositories include individual aspects of the NBN vision; however, the NBN would uniquely integrate a specific combination of features needed to translate basic genomic and proteomic research into clinical discoveries for cancer patients in the United States.

Figure 1-1: The Relationship of the NBN to Other Biospecimen Collection

Figure 1-1: The Relationship of the NBN to Other Biospecimen Collection Initiatives

While the postgenomic era holds great promise for the use of biospecimens, it also is changing the biospecimen needs of cancer researchers. It is estimated that more than 300 million specimens representing more than 150 million cases currently are stored in the United States, with over 20 million new specimens added each year.12 However, many of these samples are not collected, stored, or annotated in a manner that is compatible with genomic analysis. Furthermore, recent Federal regulations, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, have reconfigured privacy issues. Researchers often find themselves navigating a complex maze of intellectual property rights, liabilities, and other sociological barriers that currently impede the sharing of tissue samples for research and discourage clinical investigations. As a consequence, current programs and practices collectively fall short of meeting the research community’s most pressing needs in genomic and proteomic research.

1.2.1 Researcher Needs

Cancer researchers have called repeatedly for biospecimens to be collected using standardized protocols, so that results can be reproducible and comparable. They seek greater research data accessibility through an open, Web-based platform, while remaining committed to the proposition that the collection and use of biospecimens and associated data must meet the highest possible ethical standards for protecting the privacy and confidentiality of the donor. They also recognize that the usefulness of biospecimens is maximized if accompanied by relevant demographic, social history, clinical, pathology, and longitudinal data, as well as genomic and/or proteomic data. A searchable, Web-based bioinformatics system therefore is seen as crucial for facilitating scientific discovery. Many investigators also have expressed a desire for the services that accompany tissue sample analysis, such as tissue microarrays and DNA or RNA assays. The suggested approach for incorporating all of these features into an NBN is described in this Blueprint report.

The potential sources for biospecimens are expected to be derived primarily from academic medical centers and community hospitals. The potential users would be primarily scientists and researchers at academic institutions, government agencies, and biotech and pharmaceutical companies. The potential uses of biospecimens and associated data are many, including for the following purposes:

  • Target- and validation-discovery of molecular correlates
    • Primarily using RNA or protein analysis methods (large and small scale)
  • Genomic analysis
    • Mutation screening
    • Loss of heterozygosity and amplification studies
    • Methylation studies
  • Validation of diagnostic or therapeutic antibodies, or nucleic acid probes
  • Pharmacogenomic analysis

These areas involve both major and minor cancer types, as well as specimens from primary and metastatic cancer sites. Descriptions of how particular NBN constituencies might use biospecimens are found in Appendix G. When determining which products to provide to its users, NBN must address the tissue amounts required, the tissue quality required (e.g., ranging from standard clinical quality to RNA grade to protein grade), the types and numbers of tissues required (e.g., primary and metastatic sites), and the format of tissue (e.g., sections of tumors to tissue microarrays) that would be most useful to researchers for each of the above purposes.

1.2.1.1 Commercial Interests

Pharmaceutical companies comprise an important component of the customer base for the NBN. Easier access to well-annotated cancer samples could help make oncology more attractive to pharmaceutical companies and will enhance investment in developing anticancer therapies. Advances in genomics are likely to continue to segment histologically defined cancers into better-defined subsets, which may result in smaller market segments. However, these smaller but genetically defined market segments may offer the possibility for better patient responses, and ultimately may pose less risk to private sector investments if identified during the early stages of the drug development process. Other commercial users would include a broad range of companies developing predictive and diagnostic products directed at cancer and other diseases. These include companies developing diagnostic/prognostic/therapeutic antibodies, as well as companies testing new technologies. Commercial companies need access to well-defined clinical samples in order to fully develop targeted agents and new technologies. The NBN will provide access to biospecimens for these industry customers.

1.2.1.2 Academic Centers

Academic medical centers will be a principal source of the operational and technique-related expertise for the NBN, as the vast majority of current research resources are located at academic health centers. Academic researchers, by virtue of their numbers, will also constitute the primary user base of the NBN.13 Currently, many tissue access systems provide access to specimens and data only for researchers within the institution in which specimens are collected.14 The NBN seeks to broaden access and standardize procedures for obtaining specimens.

While a number of biospecimen resources exist at selected government, academic, nonprofit and for-profit institutions in the United States, there is no national, standardized, openly accessible biospecimens repository and database that is available to researchers who are interested in pursuing genomic or proteomic research. The NBN Blueprint will allow for the development of a system that will increase access across the country to these important biospecimens and associated data, while at the same time streamlining the collection and analysis of these samples from existing resources. In fact, elements of current biospecimen resources will be incorporated into the NBN through a "best practices" framework. The resource is intended to be shared openly among researchers at public and private institutions throughout the country, without the competitive or intellectual property constraints that are often barriers to resource sharing.

Although a large number of biospecimens exist in repositories today (there currently are approximately 350 organizations), materials are in various states of usefulness and readiness. In addition, no overarching standards exist, fresh/frozen tissue is not always readily available, and variations in specimen collection procedures and annotation across specimen collections are the norm (see Table 1-1).15

Preliminary findings from the RAND study16 suggest that, while all studied repositories collect paraffin-embedded samples, some repositories have a relatively small collection of fresh frozen samples, and the clinical and longitudinal annotation is uneven. Although samples are used for genomics and proteomics studies after distribution, most repositories do not proffer genomics/proteomics data. The variability (or lack) of appropriate donor-informed consent and sample tracking capabilities limits resource utility. Finally, repository design is integrally linked to its original collection objectives, resulting in little cross-repository standardization.

Table 1-1: Summary of Current Limitations and the Ideal NBN Prototype

Limitations of Existing Systems Ideal NBN Prototype
Wide variation in tissue collection, processing, and storage techniques, and difficulty obtaining sufficient samples for large-scale genomic and proteomic studies of rare cancers Single, nationally coordinated network of pathological and normal tissue collection, employing standardized procedures for storage and distribution, as well as collection of associated clinical data
Nonuniform (or nonexistent) bioinformatics systems that are incapable of remote searching and data entry Coordinated and centralized bioinformatics system for all aspects of specimen and data collection and dissemination
Restricted access to researchers outside institution at which specimens are collected Extensive, external specimen-sharing is required of NBN collection centers on a national scale
Reluctance to share exhaustible specimen supply Emphasis on collecting inexhaustible data from specimens
Consent procedures that are variable and may be insufficient for future genomics/proteomics research Standardized consent for all specimens tailored to genomic and proteomic studies

As summarized in Table 1-1, the ideal NBN prototype is to have (1) a single, nationally coordinated network of pathological and normal tissue collection, employing standardized procedures for storage and distribution and collecting associated pathological, clinical, demographic, social history, and longitudinal data and (2) a coordinated and centralized bioinformatics system for all aspects of specimen and data collection and dissemination. The NBN is envisioned to have extensive sharing of specimens by NBN collection centers on a national scale, an emphasis on collecting inexhaustible data from specimens, and more or less standardized consent of all specimens tailored to genomic and proteomic studies. Like the UK NCTR, management of the databases and access to them would be monitored by an oversight body, whose function will be to safeguard the interests of all participants. The resource will be available to scientists and medical researchers, but there will be strict controls in place to protect the confidentiality of participants.

The NBN does not anticipate supplanting the existing tissue collection resources in the United States; rather, it seeks to fill a niche not served by current resources. Existing systems vary by the nature and intent of their collection protocols, the extent of their data, and their consent procedures. Some existing systems will align well with the goals of the NBN. Such systems may have an interest in participating in the NBN, and their involvement and expertise will be welcomed. Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (SPORE) grantees and Cooperative Group programs, for example, offer many of the characteristics that the NBN desires, and may have unmet needs that may be filled by alliances with the NBN. (See 3. Biospecimen and Data Collection and Distribution and 6. Governance and Business Models for additional information on this issue.)

Meaningful, broad molecular profiles of cancers can be developed optimally from tissues and clinical data that are collected using rigorous, highly standardized procedures. Some existing systems may not be candidates for genomics/proteomics research or future advanced technology purposes, but they are valuable in their own right. For example, banks like the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project clinical trial bank are invaluable for their tight linkage between detailed clinical information and tissues; however, most of the samples were collected some time ago and are mostly fixed tissues embedded in paraffin. Similarly, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology offers great depth and expertise in pathology diagnosis from fixed tissues, but it is not a state-of-the-art frozen tissue bank with validated clinical annotation, and never was intended to be such. These existing systems will continue to serve their specific users’ needs.

Top of Page

1.3 NBN Requirements

Access to appropriately collected and annotated biospecimens is critical to accelerating progress against cancer in the postgenomics/proteomics era. Paraffin-embedded tissue is adequate for the clinical diagnosis of a specific cancer in an individual patient, and someday, with the advent of new technologies, it also may be used for a wide range of genetic studies. However, many stateof- the-art, molecular genetics-based technologies initially require fresh/frozen tissues, and successful identification and credentialing of drug targets or confirmation of diagnostic markers often depend on connecting tissue samples with a patient’s characteristics at initial presentation and after appropriate followup. Additionally, what is developed as the optimum system today may not be what is needed after 5 years. Therefore, any system must be forward thinking, capable of expansion, and flexible, and it must anticipate potential technologies that are yet to be developed. The NBN system must have the capacity to grow as the information base grows and evolve as technologies advance.

It is the goal of the NBN to provide researchers from industry, government, and academe with a standardized, inclusive, high-quality network of biological samples that is shared, readily accessible, and searchable, using state-of-the-art informatics systems. The NBN must understand current and anticipated needs of all involved research communities, and it must provide a product that researchers will both desire and use. Output must be broadly available and readily accessible to users. Longitudinal clinical data must be periodically updated and should include data points focusing on therapeutic modalities, response measures, and outcomes. The system must incorporate high levels of QC, as the quality of the biospecimens and the accuracy of the resulting data will determine how relevant and usable the samples and data are to researchers.

To meet researchers’ needs, the NBN must collect from patients with cancer sufficient numbers of tissues, blood, serum, and plasma in a manner that maintains the architecture of the tissues and the molecular integrity of DNA, RNA, and proteins in the biospecimens. The NBN should collect and provide detailed clinical (including longitudinal) and eventually genomic data for biospecimens, in addition to providing access to the biospecimens themselves. Efficient distribution of biospecimens and data to researchers would require an equitable peer review system for biospecimens and an integrated, searchable bioinformatics system for data. Long-term preservation of data would also need to be addressed.17

The Design Team identified the following, overarching requirements in order for the NBN to meet researcher needs:

Biospecimen and Data Collection and Distribution

  • Biospecimens for banking (collected for storage in and distribution by the NBN) should be obtained only after all patient diagnostic needs have been met, and should be subject to appropriate bioethical structures and procedures, to ensure patient protection.
  • The repository should consist of high-quality biospecimens appropriate for genomic and proteomic studies, and the type of biospecimens stored in the repository should be determined by an ongoing review of researcher needs.
  • Annotation data (clinical, pathological, demographic, and social history) should be accurate, quality-controlled, and standardized across collection sites.
  • The collection of longitudinal data should be strongly supported, and should include relevant biomarker measurements, if available. It is recognized that the costs for these data are likely to be high, and success will require innovative solutions.
  • Genomic and/or proteomic testing may be performed on a subset of biospecimens by the NBN. Both the testing and specific subsets should be responsive to the needs of the users and flexible to changes in the research environment.
  • The NBN should have a comprehensive representation of a broad diversity of disease and human populations. Biospecimen donors therefore should include a broad range of ethnicities, socioeconomic groups, and other demographic subgroups.

Bioinformatics and Data Management

  • The repository should support open research access and be searchable and mineable via the Internet and incorporate computational analysis tools. The technology should be amenable to sharing appropriate clinical and longitudinal data, and at the same time should protect the donors’ privacy and confidentiality. The repository should be available to a broad researcher base, and should associate clinical and experimental data with the specimens.
  • The database should support integration and expansion, by establishing strict standards for data contributors and developing platforms that will expand and extend as the science grows. It should address the different vocabularies and data collection structures inherent among scientific communities (e.g., genomics, pathology) using common data elements.
  • The database should support the exchange of information; it should capture data generated through use of the resource (both primary data and data interpretations), but should share and restrict data according to specific rules established by the NBN.
  • Although likely to be challenging, it is important that validated, investigator-derived data be returned to the NBN and linked back to original NBN tissue samples. An expanded dataset, created by the return of this experimental data to the NBN, could then be made available to all investigators.
  • The architecture should have the ability to "scale" as the volume of data increases, and it should have the ability to "extend" as datasets and types of data change. The architecture should provide interfaces that enable the construction of data mining and extraction tools, providing a comprehensive computational and data analysis environment.

Communications

  • The conduct of a broader survey of the potential user population should be a priority, to develop a more detailed and accurate picture of potential research usage trends, the need for additional services, cost sensitivities for tissues and data, and advanced analysis services.
  • Data and nomenclature standards being created for many types of research results should be incorporated into the NBN protocols.

Governance and Business Models

  • The system must be highly flexible and capable of expanding as the science progresses.
  • Development and standardization of collection, processing, storage, and distribution procedures, as well as QC and quality assurance monitoring, should be of paramount importance at all stages of the process, to allow for comparison of specimens from various collection sites.
  • Data and samples should be distributed in a clearly articulated and equitable fashion, based primarily on the quality of the proposed research. Access to biospecimens should be controlled by a neutral, streamlined peer review system that is facilitated by a Biospecimen Utilization Review Committee. The tissue access system must include timely review of requests and distribution of samples, with minimal administrative burden.

Figure 1-2. An Overview of the National Biospecimen Network

Figure 1-2. An Overview of the National Biospecimen Network

In short, the NBN seeks to create a data and tissue repository that provides aggregated, mineable information from a large number of biospecimens collected on a national basis. NBN specimens and data are expected to be highly valued and accessible to cancer researchers in both the private and public sectors. As depicted in Figure 1-2, researchers need tissue specimens and associated data as the basis for scientific discovery. The process will begin with the patient, who is the potential donor of this precious material. Voluntary health organizations can help by educating the population about the benefits of tissue donation, so that the concept is not a foreign one at an inopportune time (i.e., when a patient is diagnosed with a possibly fatal disease). After the patient provides informed consent, pathologists and surgeons will be involved in collecting, processing, and storing the specimen and providing associated data. The biospecimens and data will enter the NBN network; the NBN then plays a role in distributing the samples and associated data to researchers for use. Researchers will be invited and encouraged to return data derived from the NBN sample back to the NBN, in order to build up the national resource. The requirements proposed in this module should be considered long-term goals, with certain components of the NBN expected to become available over time.

 

Next Module: Management of Ethical and Legal Considerations

Top of Page

 




Footnotes

1 For more information about the NDC, see: www.ndoc.org/issue_teams_c_research.html

2 See the Report of the Brain Tumor Progress Review Group (2000), p. 26; the Report of the Leukemia, Lymphoma, and Myeloma Progress Review Group (2001), pp. 47-48; the Report of the Lung Cancer Progress Review Group (2001), pp. 10, 32-33; and the Report of the Gynecologic Cancers Progress Review Group (2001), pp. 4-5.

3 Knox K. and Ratcliffe C. (2002). A Strategic Framework for Establishing a National Cancer Tissue Resource for Cancer Biology and Treatment Development. UK: National Translational Cancer Research Network Coordinating Centre (September).

4 TAWG Meeting Summary, August 26-27, 2003, p. 4. http://www.ndoc.org/TASummMtgSumAB.pdf

5 Zitner A. (2003). Whose DNA is it, anyway? Many people, hoping for medical advances, give genetic material. But some researchers’ refusal to share samples has donors up in arms. Los Angeles Times (July 18).

6 The UK National Cancer Tissue Resource, launched by the National Cancer Research Institute, will receive approximately $8 million over 5 years from three primary sources: The Department of Health; the charity, Cancer Research UK; and the Medical Research Council (Spinney L. [2003]. UK launches tumor bank to match maligned Biobank. Nature Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 5 [May]: 491.). Another tissue specimen collection effort, the European Human Frozen Tissue Bank (TuBaFrost), seeks to provide high-quality frozen tumor tissue accompanied by a solid diagnosis. The system will have a centralized database containing representative histologic images and code-linked patient data. The information will be accessible in a restricted public domain but freely available to eligible European researchers (See: www.tubafrost.org). The UK is supporting a genetic database to help study geneenvironment interaction in common diseases. UK Biobank plans to start recruitment in 2004 of up to half a million participants between the ages of 45 and 69 who will be asked to contribute a blood sample, lifestyle details, and medical histories to create a national database of unprecedented size to study genes, environment, and health. The Wellcome Trust, the Medical Research Council, and the Department of Health have committed an initial $73 million over 10 years for the UK Biobank project (Medical Research Council. [2002]. The UK Biobank study gets funding go-ahead. January – June 2002 news archive. www.mrc.ac.uk/txt/index/public-interest/ public-news-4/publicnews_ archive/public-news_archive_1_2002/public-biobank_uk.htm). Biobank Japan was launched in 2003, with the explicit goal of moving earlier investments in pharmacogenomics research closer to clinical applications.

7 The Icelandic Health Sector Database cost between $135 million and $250 million to build. Under the 1998 law establishing the health record database, DeCode (the exclusive licensee) does not need individual consent for use of private medical data, but the database must meet security and privacy standards set by the government’s Data Protection Commission. DeCode has collected disease data and DNA samples, with full consent, from 80,000 Icelanders—or close to one-third of the population (McCaffrey P. [2003]. Iceland’s database tussle. Bio-IT World [April 1] or: www.bio-itworld.com/news/040103_report2255.html).

8 Biobank Japan aims to create a large-scale DNA repository, with blood samples from some 300,000 individuals, which will be linked to a database containing clinical information. Although it appears that many of the details remain to be worked out, the Japanese government has committed about $180 million over a 5-year period (Triendl R. [2003]. Japan launches controversial Biobank project. Nature Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 8 [August]: 982). See also: Asian Technology Information Program (2003). ATIP03.042: The Biobank Japan Project, July 23.

9 National Bioethics Advisory Commission (1999). Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, Volume I: Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Rockville, MD (August): 19.

10 For an annotated guide to the Web sites of the NCI Cancer Cooperative Groups, which conduct trials around the country and in Canada and Europe, see the Guide to Adult Cancer Cooperative Groups at: www.nci.nih.gov/clinicaltrials/finding/cooperative-group-web-sites/page2
11 Eiseman E., Brower J., Olmsted S., Clancy N., and Bloom G. (2003). Case Studies of Existing Human Tissue Repositories: "Best Practices" for a Biospecimen Resource for the Genomic and Proteomic Era. RAND Science and Technology (August 28).

12 Eiseman E. and Haga S.B. (1999). Handbook of Human Tissue Sources: A National Resource of Human Tissue Samples. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

13 See 3. Biospecimen and Data Collection and Distribution for a discussion about the different incentives needed in order for academic and community hospitals to participate.

14 Eiseman E., Brower J., Olmsted S., Clancy N., and Bloom G. (2003). Case Studies of Existing Human Tissue Repositories: "Best Practices" for a Biospecimen Resource for the Genomic and Proteomic Era. RAND Science and Technology (August 28).

15 Eiseman E. and Haga S.B. (1999). Handbook of Human Tissue Sources: A National Resource of Human Tissue Samples. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

16 Eiseman E., Brower J., Olmsted S., Clancy N., and Bloom G. (2003). Case Studies of Existing Human Tissue Repositories: "Best Practices" for a Biospecimen Resource for the Genomic and Proteomic Era. RAND Science and Technology (August 28).

17 Long-term preservation of data is a difficult challenge and one with which many sciences are struggling. An online catalog of specimens and an archive of integrated biomedical research data are distinct systems that need to be understood and built accordingly. Establishing long-term links and knowledge bases drives the need for establishing "active" archives. The Earth Observation System, which has spent years addressing this in earth science, may be a source for further insight on these issues (Personal communication, D. Crichton, August 23, 2003).
 

Next Module: Management of Ethical and Legal Considerations

Top of Page

 

 
Home  |  NBN Blueprint  |  About the Pilot  |  Intranet  |  Calendar  |  Publications  |  Contacts
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - National Institutes of Health - National Cancer Institute
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
National Institutes of Health
National Cancer Institute