|
|
Phase III Randomized Study of Combination Chemotherapy Comprising Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin Calcium, and Fluorouracil (Modified FOLFOX) or Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine (XELOX) in Combination With Bevacizumab With Versus Without Erlotinib in Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outcomes Outline Trial Contact Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Combination Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab With or Without Erlotinib in Treating Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Cannot Be Removed By Surgery
Basic Trial Information
|
Phase
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
|
Status
|
|
|
|
Age
|
|
|
|
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
Protocol IDs
|
|
|
|
Phase III
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
|
18 to 80
|
|
|
|
Other, Pharmaceutical / Industry
|
|
|
|
GERCOR-C04-2 EU-20565, GERCOR-OPTIMOX3-TARCEVA, ROCHE-GERCOR-C04-2, NCT00265824, GERCOR-DREAM- C04-2
|
|
|
Objectives Primary - Compare the efficacy of oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (modified FOLFOX) or oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) in combination with bevacizumab with vs without erlotinib, in terms of progression-free or overall survival, in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.
Secondary - Compare the duration of disease
control and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the tolerability of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the occurrence of secondary surgery in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the chemotherapy-free
intervals and response rates in patients treated with these regimens.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
- Histologically proven metastatic adenocarcinoma of colon or rectum
- Documented inoperable disease (i.e., not suitable for complete
carcinological surgical resection)
- Measurable lesion as assessed by CT scan or MRI in at
least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded) ≥ 20 mm with conventional CT
scan or ≥ 10 mm with spiral CT scan
- No history or evidence upon physical examination of CNS disease (e.g., non-irradiated CNS metastasis, seizure not controlled with standard
medical therapy, or history of stroke) unless adequately
treated
- No exclusive bone metastasis
- No symptomatic ascites or pleural effusion not evacuated prior to entry into the study
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
- No previous chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy for metastatic disease
- More than 6 months since prior adjuvant chemotherapy (2 years if oxaliplatin or irinotecan was received
as adjuvant therapy)
- No prior palliative chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy for metastatic disease
- More than 28 days since prior major surgical procedure or open biopsy
- More than 10 days since prior use of full-dose oral or
parenteral anticoagulants for therapeutic purposes
- No concurrent full-dose oral or
parenteral anticoagulants for therapeutic purposes
- No concurrent chronic, daily treatment with aspirin (> 325 mg/day)
- No other concurrent antitumor treatment
- No participation in another clinical trial with any investigational drug within 30 days prior
to randomization or during study participation
- No other concurrent agents known to have anticancer activity
- No concurrent radiotherapy
- No concurrent treatments that could cause an interstitial pulmonary syndrome (e.g., thoracic radiotherapy, beta blockers, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or bleomycin)
Patient Characteristics:
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- WBC ≥ 1,500/mm3
- Platelets ≥ 100,000/mm3
- Hemoglobin > 9 g/dL (may be transfused to maintain or exceed this level)
- INR ≤ 1.5
- PPT < 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Creatinine < 1.5 mg/dL
- Creatinine clearance > 30 mL/min
- Proteinuria < 2+ by dipstick OR ≤ 1 g of protein on 24-hr urine collection
- Bilirubin < 1.5 times ULN
- Alkaline phosphatase < 3 times ULN
- No peripheral sensory neuropathy
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective means of contraception (oral contraceptives, intrauterine
contraceptive device, barrier method of contraception in conjunction with spermicidal
jelly, or surgically sterilization)
- No significant traumatic injury within the past 28 days
- Fully healed wounds
- No total or partial bowel obstruction
- No uncontrolled hypercalcemia
- No other concomitant or previous malignancy, except adequately treated in situ carcinoma
of the uterine cervix or basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or cancer in
complete remission for < 5 years
- No peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 1
- No other serious nonmalignant disease
- No pre-existing lung disease (in particular chronic obstructive lung disease, pleural effusion,
lymphangitis carcinomatosis, or interstitial syndrome)
- No clinically significant (i.e. active) cardiovascular disease including any the following:
- Cerebrovascular accidents in the past 6 months
- Myocardial
infarction in the past year
- Unstable angina
- New
York Heart Association grade II or greater congestive heart failure
- Serious cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- No evidence of other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination
finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a
disease or condition that contraindicates use of an investigational drug
- Not at high risk of treatment complications
- No evidence of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
- No serious, non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
- No known allergy to any excipients of study drugs
- No significant ophthalmologic abnormality, especially severe dry eye syndrome,
keratoconjunctivitis sicca, Sjögren's syndrome, severe exposure keratitis or any other
disorder likely to increase the risk of corneal epithelial lesions (the use of contact
lenses is not recommended during the study)
Expected Enrollment 640A total of 640 patients will be accrued for this study. Outcomes Primary Outcome(s)Progression-free survival
Secondary Outcome(s)Duration of disease control Overall survival Response rates Chemotherapy-free interval Salvage surgery rates Tolerability as measured by NCI CTCAE v3.0 Quality of life as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Neurotoxicity Module v4.0 and European Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ-5D) scale at baseline, courses 4 and 6, and every 2 months thereafter Pharmacogenetics and pharmacoeconomics
Outline This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients
are stratified according to ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2), number of metastatic sites involved (1 vs > 1), age
(18-50 years vs 51-75 years vs 76-80 years), prior adjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs no), and baseline alkaline
phosphatase (normal vs elevated). Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms. - Arm I (modified FOLFOX with bevacizumab):
Patients receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours and leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours on day 1 and fluorouracil IV continuously over 46 hours beginning on day 2. Patients also receive bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with stable or responding disease then receive additional bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1 and oral erlotinib once daily on days 1-21. Treatment with bevacizumab and erlotinib repeats every 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with a subsequent relapse may restart treatment with modified FOLFOX and bevacizumab as before at the discretion of the principal investigator.
- Arm II (modified FOLFOX with bevacizumab and erlotinib): Patients receive oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, and bevacizumab as in arm I. Patients also receive oral erlotinib once daily on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with stable or responding disease then receive additional bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1 and oral erlotinib once daily on days 1-21. Treatment with bevacizumab and erlotinib repeats every 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with a subsequent relapse may restart treatment with modified FOLFOX, bevacizumab, and erlotinib as before at the discretion of the principal investigator.
- Arm III (XELOX with bevacizumab): Patients receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1, oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-7, and bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with stable or responding disease then receive additional bevacizumab alone IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1 and oral erlotinib once daily on days 1-21. Treatment with bevacizumab and erlotinib repeats every 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with a subsequent relapse may restart treatment with XELOX and bevacizumab as before at the discretion of the principal investigator.
- Arm IV (XELOX with bevacizumab and erlotinib): Patients receive oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and bevacizumab as in arm III. Patients also receive oral erlotinib once daily on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with stable or responding disease then receive additional bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1 and oral erlotinib once daily on days 1-21. Treatment with bevacizumab and erlotinib repeats every 3 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with a subsequent relapse may restart treatment with XELOX, bevacizumab, and erlotinib as before at the discretion of the principal investigator.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and then every 2 months thereafter. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for 2 years.
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations GERCOR Groupe Cooperateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie | | | Aimery de Gramont, MD, Protocol co-chair | | | | Christophe Tournigand, Protocol chair | | | | Trial Sites
|
|
|
|
France |
|
|
Avignon |
|
| | | Institut Sainte Catherine |
| | Laurent Mineur, MD | |
|
|
Dijon |
|
| | Hopital Drevon |
| | Michel Flesch, MD | |
|
|
Le Mans |
|
| | Clinique Victor Hugo |
| | Gerard Ganem, MD | |
|
|
Libourne |
|
| | Hopital Robert Boulin |
| | Dominique Auby | |
| Email:
dominique.auby@cheibourne.aquisante.fr |
|
|
Lyon |
|
| | Clinique Saint Jean |
| | Gerard Lledo | |
|
|
Montfermeil |
|
| | Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Le Raincy - Montfermeil |
| | Mostefa Bennamoun, MD | |
|
|
Paris |
|
| | Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou |
| | Bruno Landi, MD | |
| Email:
bruno.landi@egp.aphp.fr |
| | Hopital Saint Antoine |
| | Christophe Tournigand | |
| Email:
christophe.tournigand@sat.ap-hop-paris.fr |
| | Hopital Tenon |
| | Thierry Andre, MD | |
| Email:
thierry.andre@tnn.ap-hop-paris.fr |
|
|
Reims |
|
| | Polyclinique De Courlancy |
| | Philippe Colin, MD | |
| Email:
colin.courlancy@wanadoo.fr |
|
|
Senlis |
|
| | C.H. Senlis |
| | Elisabeth Carola, MD | |
|
|
Suresnes |
|
| | Hopital Foch |
| | May Mabro, MD | |
| Email:
m.mabro@hopital-foch.org |
|
|
Toulouse |
|
| | Institut Claudius Regaud |
| | Jean-Pierre Delord, MD, PhD | |
| Email:
delord.jean-pierre@claudiusregaud.fr |
|
Registry Information | | Official Title | | Phase III Study of an Optimized Chemotherapy + Avastin Strategy ± Tarceva in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer | | Trial Start Date | | 2005-05-12 | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00265824 | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 2005-09-14 | | Information Last Verified | | 2007-05-08 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
|