Skip ACF banner and navigation
Department of Health and Human Services logo
Questions?  
Privacy  
Site Index  
Contact Us  
   Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News Search  
Administration for Children and Families US Department of Health and Human Services

Children's Bureau Safety, Permanency, Well-being  Advanced
 Search

Chapter 3
Victims
Child Maltreatment 2003

Child protective services (CPS) agencies respond to the needs of children who are alleged to have been maltreated and ensure that they remain safe. The rate of children who received a disposition by CPS agencies was 45.9 per 1,000 children in the national population.1 This yields an estimate of 3,353,000 children who received investigations or assessments during 2003.

An estimated 906,000 children were found to be victims, which was approximately 31.7 percent of all children who received an investigation or assessment. A child was counted each time he or she was found to be a victim of maltreatment.2 The national rate of victimization was 12.4 per 1,000 children; the rates by individual State are illustrated in figure 3-1.

The rate of all children who received an investigation or assessment increased from 36.1 per 1,000 children in 1990 to 45.9 per 1,000 children in 2003, which is a 27.1 percent increase (figure 3-2). The rate of victimization decreased from 13.4 per 1,000 children in 1990 to 12.4 per 1,000 children in 2003, which is a 7.5 percent decrease.3

Return to Table of Contents

Types of Maltreatment

During 2003, 60.9 percent of victims experienced neglect, 18.9 percent were physically abused, 9.9 percent were sexually abused, 4.9 percent were emotionally or psychologically maltreated, and 2.3 percent were medically neglected.4 In addition, 16.9 percent of victims experienced such "other" types of maltreatment as "abandonment," "threats of harm to the child," and "congenital drug addiction." States may code any maltreatment type that does not fall into one of the main categories—physical abuse, neglect, medical neglect, sexual abuse, and psychological or emotional maltreatment—as "other." These maltreatment type percentages total more than 100 percent because children who were victims of more than one type of maltreatment were counted for each maltreatment.

Figure 3-3 illustrates that the rates of victimization by type of maltreatment have fluctuated slightly from year to year.5 For 2003, the rates of neglect and other abuse increased.

There are distinct patterns of maltreatment associated with different reporters of certain types of maltreatment. More than 40 percent of physical abuse victims were reported to CPS by either educational personnel (21.8%) or legal and justice personnel (21.5%).6 Legal and justice personnel (including law enforcement, correctional facility staff, and court staff) reported 25.7 percent of neglect victims, 25.6 percent of sexual abuse victims, and 29.9 percent of psychological maltreatment victims. Medical personnel reported 26.4 percent of medical neglect victims.

Return to Table of Contents

Sex and Age of Victims

For 2003, 48.3 percent of child victims were boys, and 51.7 percent of the victims were girls.7 The youngest children had the highest rate of victimization. The rate of child victimization of the age group of birth to 3 years was 16.4 per 1,000 children of the same age group. The victimization rate of children in the age group of 4-7 years was 13.8 per 1,000 children in the same age group.8 Overall, the rate of victimization was inversely related to the age of the child (figure 3-4).

The youngest children accounted for the largest percentage of victims. Children younger than 1-year-old accounted for 9.8 percent of victims.9

Return to Table of Contents

Race and Ethnicity of Victims

Pacific Islander children, American Indian or Alaska Native children, and African-American children had the highest rates of victimization at 21.4, 21.3, and 20.4 per 1,000 children of the same race or ethnicity, respectively. White children and Hispanic children had rates of approximately 11.0 and 9.9 per 1,000 children of the same race or ethnicity, respectively. Asian children had the lowest rate of 2.7 per 1,000 children of the same race or ethnicity.10

One-half of all victims were White (53.6%); one-quarter (25.5%) were African-American; and one-tenth (11.5%) were Hispanic (figure 3-5). For most racial categories, the largest percentage of victims suffered from neglect.11

Return to Table of Contents

Reported Disability of Victims

Child victims who were reported with a disability accounted for 6.5 percent of all victims in the 34 States that reported these data. Children with the following risk factors were considered as having a disability: mental retardation, emotional disturbance, visual impairment, learning disability, physical disability, behavioral problems, or another medical problem. In general, children with such conditions are undercounted as not every child receives a clinical diagnostic assessment by CPS.12

Return to Table of Contents

Perpetrators of Maltreatment

More than 80 percent (83.9%) of victims were abused by at least one parent. Approximately two-fifths (40.8%) of child victims were maltreated by their mothers acting alone; another 18.8 percent were maltreated by their fathers acting alone; 16.9 percent were abused by both parents.13 Victims abused by nonparental perpetrators accounted for 13.4 percent of the total (figure 3-6).

Return to Table of Contents

Factors Influencing the Determination that a Child is a Victim of Maltreatment

The determination as to whether or not a child is considered a victim of maltreatment is made during a CPS investigation. A multivariate analysis was conducted to examine what factors and characteristics of children influence this determination. This analysis was possible because the Child File format incorporates child characteristics—such as maltreatment type—for children who were victims and children who were not.

The basic hypothesis explored in this analysis is that some child characteristics or circumstances place children at greater risk for being identified as victims during the investigation process. The odds ratio analyses indicate the likelihood of different groups of children to be found to be victims of maltreatment by the CPS agency. Highlights of the findings are listed below.

Return to Table of Contents

Child and Family Services Reviews: Maltreatment in Foster Care

Through the Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSR), the Children's Bureau established a national standard for the incidence of child abuse or neglect in foster care as:

A State meets the national standard for this indicator if, of all children in foster care in the State during the period under review, the percentage of children who were the subject of substantiated or indicated maltreatment by a foster parent or facility staff is 0.57% or less.16

Analysis of NCANDS CFSR data indicates that States have improved in meeting this standard as the percentage of States in compliance has increased from 57.14 percent for 2000 to 76.32 percent for 2003; this is an improvement of 33.6 percent.17

Return to Table of Contents

Child and Family Services Reviews: Recurrence of Maltreatment

For many children who experience repeat maltreatment, the efforts of the CPS system have not been successful in preventing subsequent victimization. Through the CFSR, the Children's Bureau established the national standard for recurrence of maltreatment as:

A State meets the national standard for this indicator if, of all children who were victims of substantiated or indicated child abuse and/or neglect during the first 6 months of the period under review, 6.1% or fewer children had another substantiated or indicated report within 6 months.18

An analysis of CFSR data indicates that States have improved in meeting this standard as the percentage of reporting States in compliance has increased from 29.4 percent for 2000 to 38.6 percent for 2003, an improvement of 31.3 percent.19

Twenty-three States provided sufficient data to support an analysis of the factors that influence the likelihood of recurrence.20 In this analysis, recurrence is defined as a second substantiated or indicated maltreatment occurring within a 6-month period (183 days). The major results of the analysis are summarized below.

Return to Table of Contents

Tables

The following pages contain the tables referenced in Chapter 3. Unless otherwise explained, a blank indicates that the State did not submit usable data. Specific information about State submissions can be found in Appendix D.

Return to Table of Contents

Table Notes

Additional information regarding methodologies that were used to create the tables is provided below.

Table 3-1

Table 3-2

Table 3-3

Table 3-4

Table 3-5

Table 3-7

Table 3-10

Table 3-11

Table 3-13

Table 3-14

Table 3-16

Table 3-17

Chapter Three: Tables and Figures

Notes

1 See table 3-1. back
2 See table 3-2. A national estimate of 803,000 unique victims was calculated by dividing the number of reported unique victims (634,049) by the child population for the reporting States (57,770,062) and multiplying by 1,000. The resulting rate (10.9) was multiplied by the national child population and divided by 1,000. back
3 See table 3-3. back
4 See table 3-4. back
5 See table 3-5. back
6 See table 3-6. back
7 See table 3-7. back
8 See table 3-8. back
9 See table 3-9. back
10 See table 3-10. back
11 See table 3-11. back
12 See table 3-12. back
13 See table 3-13. back
14 Includes substantiated, indicated, and alternative response victim. back
15 See table 3-14. back
16 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families. National Standards for the Child and Family Service Reviews. Information Memorandum, ACYF-CB-IM-00-11. December 28, 2000. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families. Updated National Standards for the Child and Family Service Reviews and Guidance on Program Improvement Plans. Information Memorandum, ACYF-CB-IM-01-07. August 16, 2003. back
17 See table 3-15. back
18 See footnote 16. back
19 See table 3-16. back
20 See table 3-17. back

 

Return to Table of Contents