|
|
|
|
Table 1-28c: Condition of Rail Transit Infrastructure
(Percent)
Excel | CSV
Stations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent |
14 |
11 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
4 |
Good |
47 |
46 |
33 |
22 |
28 |
29 |
Adequate |
12 |
15 |
50 |
18 |
14 |
19 |
Substandard |
12 |
13 |
16 |
26 |
51 |
48 |
Poor |
15 |
15 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
Communication Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent |
N |
0 |
0 |
7 |
12 |
11 |
Good |
N |
61 |
62 |
69 |
63 |
43 |
Adequate |
N |
16 |
12 |
10 |
25 |
46 |
Substandard |
N |
12 |
14 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
Poor |
N |
10 |
12 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
Train Control Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent |
N |
9 |
7 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
Good |
N |
52 |
56 |
66 |
45 |
34 |
Adequate |
N |
16 |
17 |
11 |
29 |
40 |
Substandard |
N |
11 |
10 |
10 |
14 |
12 |
Poor |
N |
13 |
10 |
8 |
12 |
14 |
Traction Power Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent |
N |
25 |
21 |
37 |
8 |
9 |
Good |
N |
44 |
55 |
45 |
47 |
46 |
Adequate |
N |
10 |
11 |
11 |
45 |
44 |
Substandard |
N |
14 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
Poor |
N |
7 |
7 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
Revenue Collection Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent |
N |
27 |
30 |
34 |
26 |
26 |
Good |
N |
33 |
31 |
56 |
54 |
53 |
Adequate |
N |
18 |
18 |
2 |
10 |
10 |
Substandard |
N |
10 |
18 |
7 |
8 |
7 |
Poor |
N |
12 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
Elevated structures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent |
1 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
Good |
56 |
59 |
59 |
83 |
77 |
79 |
Adequate |
16 |
12 |
16 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
Substandard |
20 |
29 |
22 |
7 |
14 |
17 |
Poor |
7 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
Underground tunnels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent |
9 |
7 |
12 |
40 |
26 |
22 |
Good |
59 |
47 |
46 |
34 |
48 |
54 |
Adequate |
13 |
18 |
19 |
12 |
12 |
4 |
Substandard |
11 |
19 |
11 |
9 |
6 |
14 |
Poor |
7 |
9 |
12 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
KEY: N = data do not exist.
NOTE
Percents may not add to 100 due to rounding.
SOURCE
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Transit Economic Requirements Model as of Feb. 12, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|