have a case definition based on diagnosis,

focus on serious injury,

have unbiased case ascertainment,

come from data that are representative of the target population,

be based on existing data systems, and

be fully specified.

In certain circumstances, selecting a main injury from the multiple causes is necessary for international comparisons.

The selection rules for main injury changed between ICD-9 and ICD-10.

The Mortality Reference Group has concerns about the new rules.

ICE will analyze multiple cause data from several countries and develop methodologies for selecting a main injury.

Currently, there is no international consensus on the questions or inclusion criteria.

A multi-country report of 10 national household survey questions is being finalized.

Findings from this report will be used as a guide for developing a standard injury module.

Collaborative work has resulted in three journal articles on fatal work-related injuries between US, New Zealand, and Australia.

The collaborative group is exploring an international comparison of work-related motor vehicle fatalities (leading cause of death to workers).

The Occupational ICE group is seeking information from other ICE members on their data systems for occupational fatal injuries.

Currently there is no uniform/universal tool for the analysis and description of multiple injuries.

A method for building multiple injury profiles that uses the Barell Matrix was developed: ICD-9-CM are allocated to matrix cells, the units of reference become matrix cells.

This process was agreed upon and accepted by discussion group members, the group is exploring the possibility of excluding injuries that are of an Abbreviated Injury Scale severity of 1.

*Proceedings of the International Collaborative Effort on Injury Statistics Volume IV, Paris Meeting April 2003
found at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/advice.htm

Nonfatal injuries have the potential for contributing to long-term consequences: these limitations or restrictions in tasks or other social role activities are conceptualized as disability.

Two theoretical models of disability commonly in use:  Institute of Medicine model and the International Classification of Functioning model.

To translate from the conceptual models to the measurement of disability, the Washington City Group Measurement Matrix can be used as a guide for data collection which varies depending on the research goals.

No single measure of “disability.”

Measures developed at the Washington City Group for use in international measurement will be shared with and assessed by the workgroups.

Continued funding is an issue, both for annual meeting and for actual project work.

With the goal of increased funding is the need to increase accountability (via a strategic plan).

To aid in the development of the strategic plan, results from a survey identified seven critical components: infrastructure, research, dissemination/outreach, training, evaluation with measurable objectives, collaborators, and operations.

General guidance and steps were developed for the following components:

Infrastructure: Develop an expanded infrastructure to support the work of the ICE.

Research: Develop and implement a research agenda related to the ICE mission.

Dissemination & Outreach (marketing): Develop a marketing and training plan.

Training

Evaluation of ICE with measurable objectives

Collaborators: Expand ICE member countries

Operations: Funding, Participants, Meetings, and Products

Results of the ICD-10 bridge coding study in England and Wales

European Union Public Health Programme: 2003 to 2008

International Classification of External Cause of Injuries (ICECI): an update

ECOSA Working Group on quantifying post-injury levels of functioning and disability

Developing a set of indicators for injuries/accidents for the European Union: a practical approach

Update on injury registration in the Nordic countries

Deaths Due to Terror Acts – Coding the external cause for statistical purposes

Poison-ICE Update

Continued discussion on: What is an injury?