Student Introductions NameAffiliationArea of ConcentrationCourse Expectations Text Box: Purpose of Course and FEMA 426 Manual Course Goals To enhance student understanding of the measures and technology available to reduce risk from terrorist attack. To enhance student ability to assess a site for COOP requirements and natural and man-made hazards U.S. AIR FORCE FEMA Course Objectives Students will be able to: 1.Explainthe basic components of the assessment methodology. 2.Appreciatethe different assessment methodology approaches that can be used. 3.Performan assessment for a building by identifying and prioritizing assets, threats, and vulnerabilities and calculating relative risk. Course Objectives 4.Identifyavailable mitigation measures applicable to the site and building envelope. 5.Understandthe technology limitations and application details of mitigation measures for terrorist tactics and technological accidents. 6.Performan assessment for a given building by identifying vulnerabilities using the Building Vulnerability Assessment Checklist in FEMA 426. Course Objectives 7.Selectapplicable mitigation measures and prioritize them based upon the final assessment risk values. 8.Appreciatethat designing a building to mitigate terrorist attacks can create conflicts with other design requirements. 9.Understandinterfaces between assessing a facility for man-made and natural threats / hazards and for use as a COOP facility. Course Overview –Day 1 Unit I –Introduction and Course Overview Unit II –Asset Value Assessment Unit III –Threat / Hazard Assessment Unit IV –Vulnerability Assessment Unit V –Risk Assessment / Risk Management Course Overview –Day 2 Unit VI –FEMA 452 Risk Assessment Database Unit VII –Explosive Blast Unit VIII –Chemical, Biological, and Radiological (CBR) Measures Unit IX–Site and Layout Design Guidance Course Overview –Day 3 Unit X –Building Design Guidance Unit XI –Electronic Security Systems Unit XII –Finalization of Case Study Results Unit XIII–Train-the-Trainer Unit XIV–Course Wrap-up Course Materials Federal Preparedness Circular –65 FEDERAL EXECUTIVE BRANCH CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (COOP) The June 15, 2004 version of FPC-65 has been integrated into this course from the building assessment standpoint All Federal agencies, regardless of location, shall have in place a viable COOP capability to ensure continued performance of essential functions from alternate operating sites during any emergency or situation that may disrupt normal operations. Course Materials Federal Preparedness Circular –65 Alternate Facility Objective: •Ensuring that agencies have alternate facilities from which to continue to perform their essential functions during a COOP event Course Materials Federal Preparedness Circular –65 Alternate Facility Requirements: •Must be capable of implementation both with and without warning •Must be operational within a minimal acceptable period of disruption for essential functions, but in all cases within 12 hoursof COOP activation •Must be capable of maintaining sustained operations until normal business activities can be reconstituted, which may be up to 30 days Course Materials Federal Preparedness Circular –65 Alternate Facility Requirements (continued): •Must provide for a regular risk analysisof current alternate operating facility(ies) •Must locate alternate operating facilities in areas where the ability to initiate, maintain, and terminate continuity operations is maximized •Should consider locating alternate operating facilities in areaswhere power, telecommunications, and internet grids would be distinct fromthose of the primary Course Materials Federal Preparedness Circular –65 Alternate Facility Requirements (continued): •Should take maximum advantage of existing agency field infrastructures and give consideration to other options, such as telecommuting locations, work-at-home, virtual offices, and joint or shared facilities •Must consider the distanceof alternate operating facilities from the primary facility and from the threat of any other facilities/locations (e.g., nuclear power plants or areas subject to frequent natural disasters) Course Materials FEMA Publication 426 Reference Manual toMitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings FEMA Publication 452 Risk Assessment: A How-To Guide to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Threats Against Buildings FEMA 426 Reference Manual Chapter 1–Asset Value, Threat/Hazard, Vulnerability, and Risk Chapter 2 –Site and Layout Design Guidance Chapter 3 –Building Design Guidance Chapter 4 –Explosive Blast Chapter 5 –CBR Measures FEMA 426 Reference Manual Appendix A –Acronyms Appendix B –General Glossary Appendix C –CBR Glossary Appendix D –Electronic Security Systems Appendix E –Bibliography Appendix F –Associations and Organizations FEMA 426 –Chapter 1 •Asset Value Assessment•Threat/Hazard Assessment•Vulnerability Assessment•Risk Assessment•Risk Management•Building Vulnerability Assessment Checklist Text Box: FEMA 426, Figure 1-3: The Assessment Process Model, p. 1-5 FEMA 426 –Chapter 2 Site and Layout Design •Layout Design •Siting •Entry Control/Vehicle Access •Signage •Parking •Loading Docks •Physical Security Lighting •Site Utilities FEMA 426 –Chapter 3 Building Design Guidance •Architectural •Building Structural and Nonstructural Considerations •Building Envelope considerations •Other Building Design Issues •Building Mitigation Measures FEMA 426, Figure 1-10: Non-Redundant Critical Functions Collocated Near Loading Dock, p. 1-41 FEMA 426 –Chapter 4 Explosive Blast •Building Damage •Blast Effects and Predictions •Stand-off Distance •Progressive Collapse FEMA 426 –Chapter 5 CBR Measures •Evacuation •Sheltering in Place •Personal Protective Equipment •Filtering and Pressurization •Exhausting and Purging FEMA 452 Risk Assessment How-To Step 1 –Threat Identification and Rating Step 2 –Asset Value Assessment Step 3 –Vulnerability Assessment Step 4 –Risk Assessment Step 5 –Consider Mitigation Options FEMA 452 Risk Assessment How-To Appendix A –Building Vulnerability Assessment Checklist Appendix B1 –Risk Management Database v1.0: Assessor's User Guide Appendix B2 –Risk Management Database v1.0: Database Administrator's User Guide Appendix B3 –Risk Management Database v1.0: Manager's User Guide Appendix C –Acronyms and Abbreviations Summary FEMA 426 and 452 are intended for building sciences professionals. Manmade hazards risk assessments use a “Design Basis Threat.” Site and building systems and infrastructure protection are provided by layers of defense. Multiple mitigation options and techniques. Use cost-effective multihazard analysis and design. Case Study Activities In small group settings, apply concepts introduced in the course. Become conversant with contents and organization of FEMA 426. COOPERVILLE INFORMATION / BUSINESS CENTER (CI/BC) Text Box: Case Study Small information technology company which also operates a Business Center at same location Occupies portion of building rented in Suburban Office Park Data center and communications for off-site clients Computer and office support fo Cooperville Information / Business Center (CI/BC) Cooperville Information / Business Center Mission Regional Computer / Business Center ..Real-time IT support ..Backup services ..24 x 7 operations ..Temp office / computer space Customers ..Government and commercial ..Some classified work Layout ..Downstairs: Business Center, Computers, Communications, Loading dock, Storage ..Upstairs: Executive offices, Staff Threat Analysis Terrorist Threat Intelligence Threat Criminal Threat FEMA 426, Figure 2-1: An Example of Using GIS to Identify Adjacent Hazards, p. 2-5 CI/BC Hazard Analysis HazMat ..Facilities ..Highway ..Rail Liquid Fuels Air Traffic Natural Hazards HAZMATS- R-USHAZMATS- R-USHAZMATS- R-USHAZMATS- R-US Computerized Elevation Looking Northwest Computerized Elevation Looking Northeast Building Data Building Structure Mechanical Systems Gas MeterUnder StairsLoading DockGas Meter Under Loading Dock Stairs Electrical Systems And Chiller #3 Physical Security IT Systems Emergency Response Source: Mine Safety Appliances Company Design Basis Threat Explosive Blast:Car Bomb 250 lb TNT equivalent. Truck Bomb 5,000 lb TNT equivalent (Murrah Federal Building class weapon) Chemical:Large quantity gasoline spill and toxic plume from the adjacent tank farm, small quantity (tanker truck and rail car size) spills of HazMat materials (chlorine) Biological:Anthrax delivered by mail or in packages, smallpox distributed by spray mechanism mounted on truck or aircraft in metropolitan area Radiological:Small “dirty”bomb detonation within the 10-mile radius of the CI/BC building Design Basis Threat Criminal Activity/Armed Attack: High powered rifle or handgun exterior shooting (sniper attack or direct assault on key staff, damage to infrastructure [e.g., transformers, chillers, etc.]) Cyber Attack:Focus on IT and building systems infrastructure (SCADA, alarms, etc.) accessible via Internet access Levels of Protection and Layers of Defense Levels of Protection for Buildings ..Interagency Security Committee (ISC) Level II Building ..DoD Low –Primary Gathering Building Elements of the Layers of Defense Strategy ..Deter ..Detect ..Deny ..Devalue Risk Matrix FEMA 426, Adaptation of Table 1-21: Site Infrastructure Systems Pre-Assessment Screening Matrix, p. 1-39 FEMA 426, Table 1-19: Total Risk Color Code, p. 1-38 Asset: You x Threat: Intruder x Vulnerability: Open Door CBR attackVehicle bombArmed attack (single gunman)Cyber attackInfrastructureCBR attackVehicle bombArmed attack (single gunman)Cyber attackInfrastructure9842Vulnerability Rating2343Threat Rating8888Asset Value14419212848Structural Systems9842Vulnerability Rating2343Threat Rating8888Asset Value14419212848Structural Systems Summary FEMA Publication 426 Reference Manual toMitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings FEMA Publication 452 Risk Assessment: A How-To Guide to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Threats Against Buildings RMS Publications –2003 -Present CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL AND EXPLOSIVES& RISK ASSESSMENTS RMS Publications –2003 -Present Multihazard Earthquakes RMS Publications –In Development FEMA 452 (enhanced) –A How-To Guide to Prepare Multihazard Risk Assessments FEMA 430 –Site and Urban Design for Security FEMA 455 –Rapid Visual Screening for Building Security FEMA 549 –Incremental Rehabilitation to Improve Building Security FEMA 582 –Design Guide to improve Commercial Building Safety for Earthquake, Flood, and Wind Unit I Case Study Activity Introduction and Overview Background ..Answers to FEMA 452 database COOP questions applicable to Case Study found in student activity ..Note additional COOP information at end of activity Requirements As a team, determine if sufficient square footage is available for DAI essential functions ..Needed information contained in student activity ..Ask instructors any clarifying questions based upon your experience