Figure 1 |
Metropolitan areas participating in CDC’s national unlinked HIV
prevalence surveys in clinics, 1997 |
Figure 2 |
HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men, sexually transmitted
disease clinic surveys, 1997 |
Figure 3 |
HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men, sexually transmitted
disease clinic surveys, by race/ethnicity, and region, 1997 |
Figure 4 |
HIV prevalence among females, sexually transmitted disease clinic
surveys, 1997 |
Figure 5 |
HIV prevalence among females, sexually transmitted disease clinic
surveys, by race/ethnicity, and region, 1997 |
Figure 6 |
HIV prevalence among injection drug users, drug treatment center
surveys, 1997 |
Figure 7 |
HIV prevalence among injection drug users, drug treatment center
surveys, by race/ethnicity, and region, 1997 |
Figure 8 |
HIV prevalence among Job Corps entrants, by sex and race/ethnicity,
1997 |
Figure 9 |
HIV prevalence among Job Corps entrants, by state of residence, 1997
|
Figure 10 |
HIV prevalence among applicants for military service, by sex and
race/ethnicity, 1997 |
Figure 11 |
HIV prevalence among applicants for military service, by state of
residence, 1997 |
Figure 12 |
HIV prevalence among childbearing women, 1994 |
Figure 13 |
HIV prevalence among childbearing women, 1995 |
Figure 14 |
HIV prevalence among childbearing women, by race and state, 1994 |
Figure 1: Metropolitan areas participating in CDC’s national unlinked HIV
prevalence surveys in clinics, 1997
![Sexually transmitted disease clinics:
Boston, New York City, Newark, Baltimore, Washington, D.C., Atlanta, Miami, Detroit, Chicago, New Orleans, Houston, Denver, Phoenix, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle;
Drug treatment centers:
Boston, New York City, Newark, Baltimore, Washington, D.C., Atlanta, Miami, San Juan, Detroit, Chicago, New Orleans, Denver, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle;
Adolescent medicine clinics:
New York City, Baltimore, Houston, and Los Angeles](images/figure1.gif)
Back Figure 2: HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men, sexually transmitted
disease clinic surveys, 1997
![Boston: 20
New York City: 24
Newark: 20
Washington, D.C.: 8
Atlanta: 36
Detroit: 17
Chicago: 19
New Orleans: 19
Houston: 18
Denver: 14
Phoenix: 21
Seattle: 4
Los Angeles: 18](images/figure2.gif)
Includes only areas with sufficient data for analysis.
Back Figure 3: HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men, sexually transmitted disease clinic surveys, by race/ethnicity, and region, 1997
![Northeast:
White: 16.1
Black: 30.8
Hispanic: 15.8
Midwest:
White: 11.6
Black: 29.3
Hispanic: 11.9
South:
White: 18.2
Black: 30.3
Hispanic: 14.4
West:
White: 14.2
Black: 15.4
Hispanic: 16](images/figure3.gif)
Back Figure 4: HIV prevalence among females, sexually transmitted disease clinic
surveys, 1997
![Boston: 29.2
New York City: 27.9
Newark: 38.4
Baltimore: 36.4
Washington, D.C.: 32.8
Atlanta: 17.2
Miami: 64
Detroit: 3.6
Chicago: 15.2
New Orleans: 11.6
Houston: 13.6
Denver: 1.2
Phoenix: 2.4
Seattle: 2.8
Los Angeles: 5.6](images/figure4.gif)
Includes only areas with sufficient data for analysis.
IDUs not included.
Back Figure 5: HIV prevalence among females, sexually transmitted disease clinic
surveys, by race/ethnicity, and region, 1997 ![Northeast:
White: 1.4
Black: 3.4
Hispanic: 1.6
Midwest:
White: 0.4
Black: 1.3
Hispanic: 0.7
South:
White: 0
Black: 2.9
Hispanic: 0.3
West:
White: 0
Black: 0.4
Hispanic: 0.4](images/figure5.gif)
Back Figure 6: HIV prevalence among injection drug users, drug treatment center
surveys, 1997 ![Boston: 10.91
New York City: 29.00
Newark: 37.96
Baltimore: 20.84
Washington, D.C.: 16.14
San Juan: 20.13
Detroit: 6.03
Chicago: 16.76
Denver: 0.36
Seattle: 1.77
San Francisco: 9.05
Los Angeles: 0.98](images/figure6.gif)
Includes only areas with sufficient data for analysis.
Back Figure 7: HIV prevalence among injection drug users, drug treatment center
surveys, by race/ethnicity, and region, 1997 ![Northeast:
White: 14.9
Black: 38.1
Hispanic: 30.6
Midwest:
White: 4.2
Black: 12.4
Hispanic: 24.3
South:
White: 18.1
Black: 18.9
Hispanic: 0
West:
White: 0.7
Black: 10.9
Hispanic: 0.5](images/figure7.gif)
Back Figure 8: HIV prevalence among Job Corps entrants, by sex and race/ethnicity,
1997
![White, not Hispanic:
Male: 0.02
Female: 0.02
Black, not Hispanic:
Male: 0.21
Female: 0.54
Hispanic:
Male: 0.09
Female: 0.06
American Indian/Alaska Native:
Male: 0.11
Female: 0.27
Asian/Pacific Islander:
Male: 0
Female: 0
All races:
Male: 0.12
Female: 0.31](images/figure8.gif)
Source: Department of Labor
Back Figure 9: HIV prevalence among Job Corps entrants, by state of residence, 1997
![% Positive:
.40 or more: Pennsylvania, Maryland, Tennessee, South Carolina, Florida
.20 to .39: New Jersey, Georgia, Puerto Rico, Mississippi, Missouri, Wisconsin
.05 to .19: Maine, Connecticut, New York, Virginia, North Carolina, Michigan, Illinois, Kentucky, Alabama, Louisiana, Texas, Kansas, Colorado
.00 to .04: All other states](images/figure9.gif)
Source: Department of Labor
Back Figure 10: HIV prevalence among applicants for military service, by sex and
race/ethnicity, 1997
![White, not Hispanic:
Male: 0.01
Female: 0.01
Black, not Hispanic:
Male: 0.15
Female: 0.06
Hispanic:
Male: 0.03
Female: 0
American Indian/Alaska Native:
Male: 0
Female: 0
Asian/Pacific Islander:
Male: 0
Female: 0
All races:
Male: 0.04
Female: 0.02](images/figure10.gif)
Source: Department of Defense
Back Figure 11: HIV prevalence among applicants for military service, by state of
residence, 1997
![% Positive:
.00: Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Delaware, West Virginia, Minnesota, Iowa, Arkansas, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Montana, Idaho, Utah, Nevada, Oregon, Alaska
.01 to .03: Connecticut, Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois, Tennessee, Mississippi, Missouri, Louisiana, Kansas, Texas, Arizona, California
.04 to .06: Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia, Florida, Kentucky, Alabama, Oklahoma, Colorado, Washington, Hawaii
.07 or more: New York, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Puerto Rico, New Mexico, Wyoming](images/figure11.gif)
Source: Department of Defense
Back Figure 12: HIV prevalence among childbearing women, 1994![% Positive:
No data or less than 3 months of data: Vermont, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Idaho
.00 to .04: Maine, Rhode Island, Michigan, Wisconsin, Kentucky, Iowa, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Arizona, Washington, Oregon, Alaska
.05 to .19: New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Virginia, North Carolina, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Alabama, Tennessee, Mississippi, Minnesota, Missouri, Arkansas, Texas, Colorado, Nevada, California, Hawaii
.20 to .39: Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, South Carolina, Georgia, Louisiana
.40 or more: New York, District of Columbia, Florida, Puerto Rico](images/figure12.gif)
Back Figure 13: HIV prevalence among childbearing women, 1995 ![% Positive:
No data or less than 3 months of data: Vermont, District of Columbia, North Carolina, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, New Mexico, Idaho
.00 to .04: Maine, Rhode Island, West Virginia, Virginia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Kentucky, Minnesota, Iowa, Oklahoma, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Arizona, Alaska
.05 to .19: New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Alabama, Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, Kansas, Texas, Colorado, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, California, Hawaii
.20 to .39: Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, South Carolina, Puerto Rico, Louisiana
.40 or more: New York, Florida](images/figure13.gif)
Back Figure 14: HIV prevalence among childbearing women, by race and state*,
1994
![Michigan:
White: 0.007
Black: 0.156
Hispanic: 0.06
Kansas:
White: 0.015
Black: 0.164
Hispanic: 0.037
Mississippi:
White: 0.015
Black: 0.277
Hispanic: 0
Alabama:
White: 0.015
Black: 0.298
Hispanic: 0
Tennessee:
White: 0.015
Black: 0.38
Hispanic: 0
California:
White: 0.042
Black: 0.387
Hispanic: 0.06
South Carolina:
White: 0.058
Black: 0.471
Hispanic: 0
Minnesota:
White: 0.015
Black: 0.509
Hispanic: 0
Texas:
White: 0.032
Black: 0.614
Hispanic: 0.471
Connecticut:
White: 0.066
Black: 0.806
Hispanic: 0.567
New Jersey:
White: 0.092
Black: 1.284
Hispanic: 0.32
New York:
White: 0.066
Black: 1.644
Hispanic: 0.806
Florida:
White: 0.098
Black: 1.672
Hispanic: 0](images/figure14.gif)
*States meeting criteria for completeness of race/ethnicity data
Back
|