Skip Navigation Change.gov: The Obama-Biden Transition Team
 

Citizen's Briefing Book Component

LOGIN



FIND AN ISSUE YOU CARE ABOUT



MORE CATEGORIES

Content Starts Here

Idea Detail

330
Points

close guantanamo and investigate Bush crimes

I am very disappointed to hear the Pesident-Elect backing away from closing guantanamo and unraveling Bush crimes and violations of the U.S. constitution.  Regarding this, on January 12th, ACLU's Executive Director, Anthony Romero, said this:

While everyone understands that President-elect Obama will have a lot on his plate when he is sworn in, restoring our commitment to the rule of law cannot be put on the back burner. President-elect Obama is inheriting not only a financial market meltdown, but also a meltdown of a legal system under which the Bush administration has held individuals for years without charge, allowed torture and waterboarding and allowed hearsay evidence in specious military commissions. . . . Closing Guantánamo and the military commissions is a matter of both reclaiming our international reputation and increasing our national security, and must be done immediately.

While the next steps might be politically charged and require courage, they are not fundamentally complicated. Each detainee's case must be reviewed by the new Justice Department. If there is evidence of criminal conduct – and one would hope that, after all these years, the government with its vast resources in the Defense Department, the Justice Department, the CIA and FBI would have collected untainted evidence against those detainees it claims are dangerous or guilty -- detainees should be prosecuted in our traditional courts, which are the best in the world and fully capable of handling sensitive national security issues without compromising fundamental rights. If there is not, detainees should be repatriated to countries that don't practice torture. Fundamental and transformative change is neither incremental nor tentative.

President-elect Obama says he wants to look forward, but you can't look forward without looking back. You can't know where to go and how to get there without knowing where you've been. Only a full airing of the maladies that have plagued our democracy for eight years and an unconditional return to our fundamental values and the Constitution will give us back an America we can be proud of.

5 Comments  »  Posted by Walter to Additional Issues on 1/12/2009 2:00 PM

Comments

 
maryn
1/12/2009 2:17 PM
I totally agree with the above - especially that you cannot go forward without looking where you've been.  If there are no consequences for the behavior of the Bush administration and persons held accountable, these crimes will surely be repeated.  Why else do we have laws, values and a Constitution??
 
ginzinger
1/12/2009 2:30 PM
I do not see how soon-to-be President Obama can avoid holding the Bush administration accountable when the current president is still defending his illegal actions, as recently as today at his "final" press conference.  The world is watching, and we have a lot of wrongs to right before we can expect to earn back any respect.  I hope and pray that President-elect Obama intends to quietly pursue this issue, and is perhaps holding back until after he's taken office.  Otherwise there is no hope for our future as an "honorable" nation.
 
lheer
1/12/2009 2:54 PM
Richard Nixon's pardon proved that "No man is above the law" is a lie, and led the way to the Bush/Cheney administration's abuse of the Constitution and violations of Federal and International law.  

Their crimes must be investigated and properly adjudicated to prevent future abuses of executive power. 
 
jojo
1/13/2009 7:25 AM
If the crimes of the past are not investigated, then we carry these crimes forward with us.  If we refuse to hold those who have committed crimes which have resulted in unspeakable tortures and deaths, how can we keep those in prison who have been convicted of crimes far less serious or continue to send people to prison for the possession of a small amount of drugs or other minor crimes.  If President Obama refuses to investigate the policies of the past then his presidency will be tainted with the same criminal trashing of our Constitution.  For a lawyer and Constitutional scholar I see no other choice.
 
Princess1
1/13/2009 11:57 AM
I believe President-Elect Obama has to, at the least, have someone in his Cabinet, probably the Atty. General, investigate the Bush administration's crimes.  I understand the need to go forward, but in order for Mr. Obama's oath that he takes Tuesday to be valid, he has to promise to uphold the laws of the land, and then follow through with it in regard to Bush/Cheney.
Subscribe to ideas