Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
Study 6 of 60 for search of: | "Cholangiocarcinoma" |
Previous Study | Return to Search Results | Next Study |
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored by: |
Khon Kaen University |
---|---|
Information provided by: | Khon Kaen University |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00721175 |
To compare the adequacy of unilateral endoscopic biliary drainage using metallic stent with plastic stent in unresectable, complex, hilar, cholangiocarcinoma and cost analysis
Condition | Intervention | Phase |
---|---|---|
Cholangiocarcinoma |
Device: biliary stent (self expandable metallic stent) Device: biliary stent ( Amsterdam type plastic stent) |
Phase IV |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study |
Official Title: | Efficacy and Cost Analysis of Plastic Stent Compare to Metallic Stent in Unresectable Complex Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma; a Randomized Controlled Trial |
Estimated Enrollment: | 100 |
Study Start Date: | November 2007 |
Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2009 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date: | June 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Arms | Assigned Interventions |
---|---|
1: Experimental
metallic stent group
|
Device: biliary stent (self expandable metallic stent)
metallic stent was inserted into right or left hepatic duct which was planed before intervention using CT scan or MRCP
|
2: Active Comparator
plastic stent group
|
Device: biliary stent ( Amsterdam type plastic stent)
plastic stent was inserted into right or left hepatic duct which was planed before intervention using CT scan or MRCP
|
There are two types of biliary stents: 1) the plastic stent made from polyethylene or polytetrafluoroethylene; and, 2) the metal stent braided in the form of a tubular mesh from surgical-grade stainless steel alloy and designed to expand to a maximum diameter of 10 mm. The main drawback of the plastic stent is the relatively high occlusion rate, but its advantage is the lower cost. The use of a metal stent for hilar tumor has many theoretical advantages: 1) the flexible open-mesh design should allow drainage of secondary duct branches; and, 2) its larger diameter may provide better drainage and longer patency (~3-9 months).
Whether one type of stent is superior in terms of adequacy of drainage or cost-effectiveness remains undefined. Therefore, we would conduct this study to assess the efficacy of drainage of endoscopically-inserted, unilateral, plastic stents vs. metallic stents in unresectable, complex, hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contact: apichat sangchan, MD | (66)850004651 | apichaz@yahoo.com |
Thailand, KhonKaen | |
Srinagarind Hospital. KhonKaen University. | Recruiting |
Muang, KhonKaen, Thailand, 40002 | |
Contact: apichat sangchan, MD (66)850004651 apichaz@yahoo.com | |
Principal Investigator: apichat sangchan, MD |
Principal Investigator: | apichat sangchan, MD | Department of Medicine. Faculty of Medicine. KhonKaen University |
Responsible Party: | Department of Medicine. Faculty of Medicine. KhonKaen University ( apichat sangchan ) |
Study ID Numbers: | HE500636 |
Study First Received: | July 21, 2008 |
Last Updated: | July 22, 2008 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00721175 |
Health Authority: | Thailand: Khon Kaen University Ethics Committee for Human Research |
hilar cholangiocarcinoma biliary stent plastic stent metallic stent |
Cholangiocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Carcinoma |
Neoplasms Neoplasms by Histologic Type |