(1) |
Ability. A
present competence to perform an observable behavior or a behavior which results
in an observable product.
|
(2) |
Appointing Authority (Official). The person delegated the authority to authorize personnel' actions. In IHS, this authority is given to the Personnel Officers, and delegated to others under their line authority.
|
(3) |
Area of
Consideration. the area, organization, or group of organizations
in which an intensive search is made for eligible candidates to fill
vacancies covered by this merit promotion plan.
|
(4) |
Best Qualified
Candidates. Those qualified candidates who rank at the top when
compared with other eligible candidates for promotion and who are referred
to the selecting official for consideration as those most likely to perform
the job in a superior manner.
|
(5) |
Career Ladder
Position. A position where the grade progression from entry level
to the full performance level is identified and documented on position
descriptions and vacancy announcements.
|
(6) |
Change-to-Lower
Grade. The change of an employee to a lower grade when both the
old and the new positions are under the GS, or under the same wage grade
schedule, or to a position with a lower rate of basic pay when both are old
and the new positions are under the same type upgraded wage schedule or in
different pay-method categories.
|
(7) |
Crediting Plan.
A set of criteria used to predict performance on the job of candidates rated
eligible for the job; sometimes called ranking schedule.
|
(8) |
Detail.
The temporary assignment of an employee to a different position or to
unclassified duties for a specified period with the employee retaining
his/her position of record and returning to his/her regular duties at the
end of the temporary assignment.
|
(9) |
Job Analysis.
The process of identifying the knowledge, skills, abilities (KSAs), and
other characteristics essential to a position in order to provide a
job-related basis for evaluation and selection for that position.
|
(10) |
Knowledge.
A body of information applied directly to the performance of a function.
|
(11) |
Minimum Area of
Consideration. The smallest geographic or organizational area from which it
is reasonably expected that enough high quality candidates will be located to fill a particular
vacancy covered by this plan and within which a vacancy must be announced.
|
(12) |
Minimum Qualification
Standards. For positions
in the competitive service, and for positions in the excepted service when Preston Standards have not been developed, the qualification standards prescribed by the OPM in its Qualification Standards Operating Manual and Handbook X-118C,or OPM approved single agency standards are
to be used to determine minimum qualifications. These standards may be supplemented by appropriate selective factors, as approved by the SPO
or OPM, as appropriate.
|
(13) |
Outside Applicants. Any applicant other than current permanent HHS employees who:
|
(14) |
Performance
Appraisal. Evaluation of an employee's performance on
various aspects of work performed in the present position.
|
(15) |
Preston/Excepted Service
Qualification Standards. Preston Standards are Excepted Service Qualification Standards that are established for use when Indian applicants apply for jobs in the IHS. In 1984, a
U.S. Court of Appeals decision was made which affects hiring practices for American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) in the IHS. This court decision is referred to as the
Preston Case and the standards that are developed in connection with the case are called "Preston Standards."
|
(16) |
Priority Promotion
Consideration. Referral before other candidates are sought through the promotion plan process of an employee or applicant who failed, as a result of a procedural error or violation, to receive proper consideration in
a competitive promotion action. An employee or applicant is entitled to be referred to the next vacancy for which he/she is qualified that is at
the same grade and under the same promotion plan as the position for which proper consideration was not given; and, in the same geographic location (commuting area) or in another location the employee or applicant has indicated a willingness
to accept.
|
(17) |
Promotion. A promotion is the change of an employee to a position at a higher grade level within the same job classification system and pay schedule or
to a position with a higher rate of basic pay in a different job classification system and pay schedule.
|
(18) |
Qualified Candidates. Candidates who meet the legal and regulatory requirements including citizenship, time-after-competitive-appointment, time-in-grade (if applicable), other eligibility requirements e.g., Public Law
(P.L.)101-630, suitability, and meet and/or exceed minimum qualification standards, including any selective factors established for the position to be filled.
|
(19) |
Ranking. Ranking is the process of applying the
KSA ranking schedule to the applications and arranging qualified candidates in order based on the results of this process.
|
(20) |
Rating. Rating is the process of reviewing the backgrounds of candidates to determine if they meet the minimum qualifications for the position.
|
(21) |
Realignment. The
movement of an employee with his to her position within the HHS/IHS. A
realignment action is not the filling of a vacancy.
|
(22) |
Reassignment. The change of an employee from one position
to another within the Department without promotion or change to lower grade.
|
(23) |
Selecting Official. The official who makes the management decision regarding the choice of a person to fill a position by any type of personnel
action.
|
(24) |
Selective Factors. These factors are
KSAs which are essential for satisfactory performance on the job and represent an addition
to the basic qualification standard for a position.
|
(25) |
Skill. A present, observable competence
to perform a learned psychomotor act (able to be seen, heard, or otherwise perceived by a person, other than the person performing the action.)
|
(26) |
Subject Matter Expert.
An employee at the same grade level or higher, than the job being rated, who has bona-fide knowledge
of what it takes to do the job. This normally includes first line and other supervisors who have a current and thorough
knowledge of the job requirements, and employees who are performing or have performed the same
or very similar duties.
|
(27) |
Transfer. The change
of an employee, without a break in service of one full workday, from a position in one department/agency
to a position in another department/agency.
|
(28) |
Vacancy. A vacancy
is an unencumbered position which management plans to fill.
|
(1) |
Oversee the promotion
plan and ensure fair and equitable application to all affected employees and
positions. The SPOs operate the plan for employees and positions under
their appointing authority except that the Headquarters, Division of Human
Resources (DHR) will also operate the plan for positions for which also
operate the plan for positions for which selection authority is exercised by
a Headquarters official even though an Area Personnel Office may have
appointing authority over the position.
|
(2) |
Provide technical
assistance and guidance to management officials, supervisors, and employees
on all promotion matters.
|
(3) |
Assist management in
locating qualified candidates. Refer the best qualified
candidates. Refer the best qualified candidates to the selecting
official within the framework of Indian Preference.
|
(4) |
Assist subject matter
experts in the job analysis and development of KSA crediting plans.
|
(5) |
Keep candidates and
supervisors informed of the status of pending actions.
|
(6) |
Ensure that those who
are assigned merit promotion administration responsibilities are properly
trained to assume such responsibilities.
|
(7) |
Consult with the
selecting official when determining the area of consideration and whether to
convene an ad hoc promotion panel.
|
(8) |
Determine whether
selective factors are appropriate and consistent.
|
(9) |
Assure that Indian
preference and merit principles and requirements have been applied before
effecting an action to fill a position and take corrective action where
appropriate when violations of these principles occur.
|
(10) |
Evaluate all candidates to determine eligibility.
|
(11) |
Maintain promotion records as shown in 7-2.13.
|
(1) |
Analyze staffing needs, keep the SPO informed of immediate and long-range human capital needs, assist SPO staff in identifying recruitment sources likely
to yield high quality candidates, and initiate requests for personnel action in sufficient time for all required processing.
|
(2) |
Provide appropriate performance counseling to employees and ensure that a timely performance appraisal is on file for each employee supervised.
|
(3) |
Work with the SPO in developing and documenting selective factors and specific evaluation criteria for individual vacancies according
to the nature of the position.
|
(4) |
Participate with the SPO
in determining area of consideration and whether to convene an ad hoc promotion panel.
|
(5) |
Consider all appropriate information about employees certified
to them for consideration before making selections in accordance with the requirements
of this plan.
|
(6) |
Apply the principles and requirements of this merit promotion plan, including the principles
of equal employment opportunity and Indian preference, when filling a position; and be held accountable for actions that violate law, regulations, or applicable promotion plans.
|
(1) |
Become familiar with the provisions
of the Merit Promotion and Excepted Service Examining Plans so that they may advise EEO counselors on the applicable procedures and provide employees and applicants with accurate information when concerns are raised.
|
(2) |
Be consistent with Indian preference laws and regulations, assisting managers and the SPO in locating candidates from under-represented groups, as identified in the IHS EEO Affirmative Employment Plan and Federal Equal Opportunity Recruitment Program.
|
(3) |
Bring to the SPOs' attention any questions raised by employees/applicants concerning the administration of the merit promotion plan.
|
(4) |
Support the principle of EEO that prohibits employment discrimination based on age, race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, or sexual orientation.
|
(1) |
Demonstrate that they have the KSAs and personal qualifications necessary to qualify for positions for which they desire consideration.
|
(2) |
Submit the required completed forms within the time frames indicated on the vacancy announcements. Those claiming Indian preference must provide proof as
shown in 7-2.6A(3).
|
(3) |
Perform the duties of their current positions in a manner which shows that they are ready
to be considered for advancement to more difficult work and greater responsibility.
|
(4) |
When temporarily absent, on detail, on leave, at training courses, in military service, or on regular purpose Intergovernmental Personnel Act assignments, provide the SPO with a current application to ensure consideration for specific vacancies announced during their absence for occupations for which they wish consideration.
|
(4) |
Selection for training which is given primarily
to prepare an employee for advancement and is required for promotion (i.e., when eligibility for promotion depends on whether the employee has completed training.)
|
(5) |
Time-limited (temporary) promotion
of an employee expected to exceed a total of 120 days in a 12-month period (prior service under noncompetitive details to higher grade positions or noncompetitive temporary promotions, during the preceding 12 months,
MUST be included in the calculation of the 120 days). If a temporary promotion which was expected to last less than 120 days was originally made as an exception
to competitive procedures, any extensions beyond 120 days must be made under competitive procedures.
Time-limited promotions made under competitive procedures may be extended for up to
5 years. A time-limited promotion of an Indian employee effected under competitive procedures may be made permanent without further competition provided that the fact that it might become permanent was noted
on the vacancy announcement.
|
(6) |
Transfer or reinstatement to a higher graded position
or to a position with known promotion potential higher than the potential of a position held at any time on a permanent basis in the competitive service or under Schedule
A authorities 213.3112(a)(7)or 213.3116(b)(8). For example, an employee is hired from a competitive examination as a GS-5 in a GS-5/7/9/11/12 career ladder. This employee is promoted
to GS-9. He/she then accepts a demotion to GS-6 with no promotion potential. He/she leaves the Federal Government. The employee may be reinstated
to a GS-9 position which has promotion potential to GS-12 because at one time he/she held a GS-9 with promotion potential
to GS-12. He/she may not be reinstated to a GS-11 or to a GS-9 with promotion potential
to GS-13 without competition. If he/she is not entitled to Indian preference, any reinstatement is subject
to Indian preference rules.
|
(7) |
In situations when Indian preference is waived under P.L.
96-135, the SPO must determine whether the action being effected requires competition under merit promotion procedures (e.g., Indian
preference is waived to permit the reassignment of an individual whose relationship with the tribe
has deteriorated but the new position has greater promotion potential than the employee's current
position and the employee never held any other position with more potential than his
or her current position. In such a case, merit promotion competition would be required.)
|
(2) |
When the incumbent of the position is promoted without significant change in responsibilities and duties (i.e., correction of a classification error or issuance of a new classification standard.)
|
(3) |
A promotion resulting from an employee's position being reclassified at a higher grade as a result
of additional duties and responsibilities that have evolved and grown into a higher grade position over
a period of time (also known as accretion of duties.) For such promotions, the employee must continue to perform the same basic function in the upgraded position, with the former duties being absorbed into the revised duties, and meet minimum qualification and eligibility requirements for the position. The promotion must be approved by the
SPO. (Normally this condition will not be met in actions where employees go from clerical or assistant positions to professional or administrative positions or where employees go from non-supervisory
to supervisory positions. Noncompetitive promotion to a supervisory position may be appropriate when the individual already supervises one or two employees and the addition
of more employees would result in a higher grade when the position is compared to the General
Schedule Supervisory Guide.)
|
(4) |
When the function(s) and
incumbent(s) are moved from one geographic and/or organizational location to another without change in duties or
responsibilities, e.g., transfer of function or realignment.
|
(5) |
A career ladder promotion following noncompetitive conversion of a cooperative education student in accordance with the requirements of Executive Order 12015 and amended by Executive Order 13024.
|
(6) |
Details to the same or lower grade [with no greater promotion potential than the employee's current position or any position held on a permanent basis in the competitive service or under Schedule
A authorities 213.3112(a)(7) or 213.3116 (b)(8)] or to
unclassified duties in increments of 120 days with no limit on the number of
times the details may be renewed for persons entitled to Indian preference. For persons not entitled to Indian preference, renewal of details beyond
1 year must be approved by the SPO and a management official at a higher level than the official who approved the initial detail. Details must be made for sound management reasons and may not be used
to circumvent Indian preference requirements.
|
(7) |
Details of 120 days or less
to a higher grade position or to a position with promotion potential beyond the potential of the employee's current position
or the potential of any position held by the employee on a permanent basis in the
competitive service or under Schedule A authorities 213.3112(a)(7) or 213.3116(b)(8).
Noncompetitive details to higher grade positions and noncompetitive temporary promotions during the prior 12 months count toward the
120 days. (Servicing Personnel Offices are cautioned to ensure that details are not effected for the purpose of circumventing Indian preference.)
|
(8) |
A position change involving displacement effected under RIF regulations.
|
(9) |
Re-employment of an individual under
P.L. 93-638, Section 105(I) and implementing OPM regulations in Subpart G of
5 CFR 352.
|
(10) |
A temporary appointment
not to exceed 30 days, and one extension of 30 days, to meet documented
special or emergency needs (within a 12-month period).
|
(11) |
An employee is demoted or
reassigned to a non-supervisory/non-managerial position because he/she did not satisfactorily complete a probationary period as a supervisor/manager.
|
(12) |
An employee is demoted under
5 United States Code (U.S.C.) Chapter 43 (performance) or Chapter 75 (conduct).
|
(13) |
Return of an employee from a temporary promotion to his
or her former position.
|
(14) |
Placement of an employee who has been removed from the Senior Executive Service for performance or conduct.
|
(15) |
An employee is changed from employment in the civil service
to employment in the PHS Commissioned Corps, or vice versa, but continues to perform the same job; i.e., carries out the same duties and/or responsibilities.
Note: Commissioned corps officers who wish to enter into the competitive service, and do not have any civil service status, must compete for a position through the competitive process.
|
(16) |
Persons exercising
restoration rights following military service and persons exercising
restoration rights to their former position following recovery from an
on-the-job injury within 1 year.
|
(17) |
A placement necessary so
that a P.L. 94-437 scholarship recipient can satisfy his or her service obligation.
|
(1) |
temporary promotion for
120 days or less.
|
(2) |
An action taken as a remedy for failure
to receive proper consideration in a competitive promotion. (See definition of priority promotion consideration in
7-2.1D(16).)
|
(3) |
Reinstatement or
transfer to a position of the same or lower grade with promotion potential
that does not exceed the highest potential of any position held on a
permanent basis in the competitive service or under Schedule A authorities
213.3112(a)(7) or 213.3116(b)(8).
|
(4) |
Reassignment or demotion from
one position to another having no higher promotion potential than the
employee's current position or the potential of any position held on a permanent
basis in the competitive service or under Schedule A authorities
213.3112(a)(7) or 213.3116(b)(8). Noncompetitive movement may be made
from one career ladder to another, provided the journey level of the career
ladder to which the employee moves is no higher than the journey level of
his or her current career ladder or any which he or she permanently held in
the past in the competitive service or under Schedule A authorities
213.3112(a)(7) or 213.3116(b)(8). The movement of an employee in
retained grade status to another position at the level of the retained grade
is like a reassignment and under the provisions of this paragraph, if no
greater promotion potential is involved, it is permissible to effect the
action without using promotion plan procedures. The nature of action
is called a "Position Change to Retained Grade," and the
employee's retained grade entitlement is terminated.
|
(5) |
Promotion of an
employee up to and including the highest grade ever held on a permanent
basis in the Federal Government under a competitive service appointment or
under Schedule A authorities 213.3112(a)(7) or 213.3116(b)(8) provided that
the employee was not downgraded for personal cause.
|
(6) |
A temporary appointment
not-to-exceed (NTE) 1 year provided the appointment is made in accordance
with 5 CFR 316 and 333 and/or Part 7, Chapter 1, "Excepted Service
Examining Plan," IHM, whichever is appropriate.
|
(7) |
Reinstatement from the re-employment priority list.
|
(8) |
Appointment via competitive examination or under excepted service appointment authorities in accordance with
5 CFR 213 and 302 and HHS Instruction 302-1. Some examples of the excepted service appointment authorities are:
|
C. |
RECURRING POSITIONS. For positions with recurring need
to fill, the SPO may issue vacancy announcements which will remain open on
a continuous basis and may be used to fill vacancies as they occur. These announcements will be posted continuously during the open period throughout the area of consideration and will contain a
statement that all interested and qualified employees may file applications for consideration for any of these positions until the closing date of the announcement
or until cancelled, whichever occurs first.
|
D. |
OPEN UNTIL FILLED. Announcements may also be issued on
an "opened until filled" basis. The SPO
is responsible for assuring that objective criteria are established at the onset
for determining when these announcements will be closed (e.g., applications from a
specific number of candidates received.) Personnel offices must also document the date on which the
announcement is closed.
|
E. |
AREA OF CONSIDERATION. As a general rule, HHS employees from
outside the area of consideration may apply and be considered under a
vacancy announcement even though candidates have not been sought from
outside the minimum area of consideration. They will receive the same
consideration as those from employees who apply from within the area of
consideration except in situations where such applications will not be
accepted because of a reduced area of consideration.
|
F. |
ADDITIONAL SELECTIONS. Additional selections of
candidates may be made from a promotion certificate within 90 days from
the date the selection certificate was issued. The positions to be
filled must have the same title, series, and grade, be in the same
geographic location, and have the same qualification requirements.
However, if there are no qualified Indian preference candidates left on
the certificate, the vacancy must be re-announced.
|
G. |
SELECTION DECISIONS. Selecting officials may decide not
to make a selection from the certificate of candidates presented for
consideration. A decision, for example, may be made not to fill the
position at that time, to cancel or abolish the position, or to
re-advertise the position in an effort to identify additional
candidates. Such decisions must, of course, be for sound management
purposes and not to circumvent the spirit or letter of the Indian
preference requirement. A position may not be re-advertised for 120 days
from the date the certificate was issued if there were three or more
qualified and available Indian candidates identified through the prior
announcement.
|
(1) |
Tile, series, and grade of the position to be filled.
|
(2) |
A brief summary of the responsibilities and duties.
|
(3) |
Area of consideration and reason for special areas, when applicable.
|
(4) |
Qualification requirements (including quality of experience, when
applicable.
|
(5) |
Time-in-grade requirements.
|
(6) |
Application procedures.
|
(7) |
Evaluation methods.
|
(8) |
Equal employment opportunity statement.
|
(9) |
Indian preference statement.
|
(10) |
A statement regarding any known promotion potential.
|
(11) |
Organizational designation of the position.
|
(12) |
Duty station.
|
(13) |
Conditions of employment including: temporary if not permanent tour of
duty, if part-time or intermittent, or other than normal working hours;
frequent travel or percentage of time spent in travel, etc.
|
(14) |
Opening and closing dates for applying.
|
(15) |
If the position is supervisory or managerial, a statement regarding the
requirement for a probationary period for first-time supervisors/mangers
in the competitive service.
|
(16) |
Payment or non-payment of relocation expenses.
|
(17) |
A statement that commissioned officers may indicate an interest in
being considered within the commissioned corps by submitting a resume' or
curriculum vitae to the SPO. The statement should also indicate that
it is up to the officer to submit sufficient information, as stated in the
vacancy announcement to permit the SPO to determine whether he or she
meets qualification requirements including any selective factors.
|
(18) |
A statement that additional or alternate selections may be made within
90 days of the date the selection certificate was issued if the position
becomes vacant or to fill an identical additional position in the same
geographic location.
|
(19) |
A statement indicating that smoking is not allowed in IHS facilities.
|
(20) |
If applicable, a statement indicating that the placement in the
position requires a negative drug testing result and that the incumbents
of the position are subject to random drug testing.
|
(21) |
A statement specifying that only material received (or postmarked) by
the closing date will be considered. The announcement must clearly
indicate whether the material must actually be received or whether the
postmark is being used. If the postmark is used, the announcement
should also state the number of days following the closing date which will
be allowed, e.g., material postmarked on the closing date and received
within 5 calendar days will be accepted. The announcement must also
indicate whether or not applications may be submitted by FAX or e-mail.
|
(22) |
If applicable, a statement that the position is covered by P.L.
101-630, the Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act,
and that persons convicted of crimes enumerated in the law are not
eligible for the position. Applicants for covered child care
positions must submit the required information about any criminal
background.
|
(23) |
A statement that veterans eligible for appointment under special
appointing authorities may apply. [The Veterans Employment Act of
1998 requires all Agencies to include the following statement on all Merit
Promotion announcements: "Veterans who are preference eligibles or
who have been separated from the armed forces under honorable conditions
after 3 years or more of continuous active service may apply."]
|
(24) |
If applicable, if the position requires clinical privileges, a
statement must be included that, "the selected individual is required to
obtain and maintain medical staff clinical privileges. If privileges
are not obtained or maintained during employment, the employee may be
subject to adverse actions, up to and including removal from the Federal
service."
|
(25) |
A statement that "the Indian Health Service provides reasonable
accommodations to applicants with disabilities. if you need a
reasonable accommodation for any part of the application and hiring
process, please notify the IHS SPO (name and telephone number of contact.)
The decision on granting reasonable accommodation will be on a
case-by-case basis."
|
(26) |
If applicable, a statement that the employee may be required to be on
an on-call status or confined to a designated location for stand-by
purposes.
|
(27) |
If applicable, a statement indicating that employees placed in the
position will be subject to immunization requirements as determined by the
IHS.
|
(1) |
A resume' or other application. Applicants may not be required to complete a specific application
form, but the vacancy announcement must specify the information that applicants must
provide.
|
(2) |
A current performance appraisal, if available. (See 7-2.8C)
|
(3) |
Employees claiming Indian preference must submit with the employment application, a copy of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) form, BIA-4432,"Verification of Indian Preference for Employment in Bureau of Indian Affairs and Indian Health Service Only." This requirement may be waived at the discretion of the SPO for Indian preference
eligibles currently employed within the organization serviced by the SPO producing the announcement, provided proof is on file in the employee's
OPF, and that fact is
so stated on the resume' or application. Once the SPO decides to require the form or to waive it, it must be a uniform policy.
|
(4) |
As required by the SPO, to obtain educational credit, employees must submit a college transcript, diploma, certificate of achievement,
or other appropriate proof of educational attainment.
|
B. |
EMPLOYEES WHO ARE TEMPORARILY ABSENT.
See 7-2.2E(4) for instructions covering those employees who are temporarily absent.
|
C. |
RECEIPT AND POSTMARK. Only material associated with the
application that is received or postmarked by the closing date will be
considered. For example, if the position being filled has a positive
education requirement, and an applicant claims to have such education,
but does not submit proof as shown above with his/her application,
he/she cannot be considered qualified. Similarly, unless the SPO has waived the requirement for proof of Indian preference, as shown in 7-2.6A(3), above for its serviced employees, if an Indian preference candidate applies and does not submit
this proof at the time of application, he/she is considered
a non-preference eligible for that vacancy.
|
D. |
CLOSING DATE. The closing date of an announcement may be
extended, at the discretion of the SPO for acceptance of applications from interested individuals
in specific locations when, due to circumstances beyond their control, they were unable
to get their applications to the SPO within 30 days of the closing date of the announcement. An example of a circumstance
beyond the control of the applicant is the delayed receipt of the announcement by the addressee
organization(s) which would
so shorten the timeframe for applying as to preclude receipt of applications (in
the SPO) from the affected location(s) by the originally specified closing date. The Personnel
Officer must obtain appropriate assurances from the responsible official(s) in the addressee
organization(s) that circumstances beyond the control of applicants at the location existed. The Personnel Officer then may extend the closing date
of the announcement at only the affected location(s) or at all locations. Whatever the decision
of the Personnel Officer is, it must be documented in writing and be made a part of the records in the
vacancy announcement file. Failure of the applicant/employee to submit a
timely application due to his/her absence whether on leave or vacation will not
be considered a circumstance beyond his/her control.
|
A. |
TIME-AFTER-COMPETITIVE APPOINTMENT. Time-after-competitive
appointment as specified in 5 CFR 330.
|
B. |
TIME-IN-GRADE REQUIREMENTS. Time-in-grade requirements
as specified in 5 CFR 300 and HHS Personnel Instruction 302-1.
|
C. |
MINIMUM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS. Minimum qualification
standards, including a description of the quality of experience, where
appropriate, and as prescribed by the OPM
or HHS (the Preston Standards), will be used in filling positions under the provisions of this plan. These are described in 7-2.1D(13) and 7-2.1D(15).
|
D. |
SELECTIVE FACTORS. When required, appropriate selective
factors may also be used. Whenever selective factors are determined to
be essential to satisfactory job performance, such factors will be
jointly developed by the selecting official with input from the
immediate supervisor and the Human Resources Specialist and approved by
the SPO. These factors will constitute part of the minimum requirement for the position and will be stated on the vacancy announcement. Once approved, the selective factors must be used each time the position is filled (unless the job changes materially
or it is determined that the selective factor was originally used in error.) Examples of essential selective factors are the ability
to speak, read, and/or write in a language other than English, the knowledge or ability pertaining
to a certain program or mission when these cannot readily be acquired after selection,
or the proven ability in a functional area (e.g., ability to evaluate alternative
automated data processing systems, etc.)
|
E. |
MODIFICATION. A qualification standard may not be
modified after the merit promotion process is underway unless: A n
inappropriate standard has been used through error or the OPM has issued a revised standard. If the modification is due to, "an inappropriate standard has been used through error," the change in the qualification standard must receive prior approval
of the SPO or (his/her) designee. When the standard has been appropriately modified, the process for filling the vacancy must be reinitiated and all employees eligible under the modified standard shall be considered. The reason for modifying a qualification standard must be documented and maintained as part of the merit promotion records. Qualification standards in the excepted service may be
waived in accordance with HHS Instruction 302-1. Agencies are permitted to
modify qualification standards except for positive education requirements for
in-service placement actions in the competitive and excepted service. In
the IHS, this is only permitted for actions which do not require the application
of competitive promotion procedures, and may be used only for individuals
entitled to Indian Preference.Nothing in this plan affects IHS' authority to waive
qualification requirements in a RIF as permitted by 5 CFR 351 and HHS
Instruction 351-1.
|
F. |
LICENSURE. Requirements of the PHS on licensure of
health care providers, or any succeeding IHS policy, are included as a
part of the qualifications standard for each of the covered positions.
If the Preston Standards are different from the licensure policy, the
Preston Standards take precedence, even if an Indian applicant who meets
the Preston Standards does not meet the licensure policy, the applicant
is qualified for the position.
|
G. |
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL. In some situations an employee's
performance appraisal can be used to determine that he or she is not
qualified for a position even though it first appears that he or she has
the required experience and training. If an employee or applicant
has failed a critical element for a position being filled, he or she is
not qualified for the position being filled. However, if
subsequent to the failure on the critical element, the employee or
applicant has demonstrated through other experience that he or she is
now capable of performing at an acceptable level on the critical
element, he or she must be found qualified. For example, a nurse
failed a critical element 5 years ago and has no new opportunities to
perform in a nursing position, he or she should be found not to be
qualified for a nursing position with a comparable critical element.
On the other hand, if during those 5 years, he or she has performed
successfully in several nursing positions whether they were in IHS or
not, he or she should be found qualified assuming that they had similar
requirements to the position being filled. [Note: Failure means
performing at the unacceptable level. In a two level system, it would be
the unacceptable level.]
|
H. |
CITIZENSHIP. Proof of U.S. citizenship is required for
an appointment to the IHS. The Director, IHS, may grant an exception to
this policy for appointments to excepted positions, provided that the
current appropriations act permits IHS to pay citizens from the country
where the applicant is from. If the only available applicant is a
non-citizen, an exception must be requested or the position will have to
remain vacant.
|
I. |
OTHER ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. There may be other
eligibility requirements which applicants must meet in addition to the
qualification requirements. For example, P.L. 101-630 and P.L. 101-647,
the Crime Control Act of 1990, provides that individuals convicted of
certain crimes, or any of 2 or more misdemeanor offenses involving
certain crimes of violence, are not eligible for positions involving
regular contact with children. Thus, even though an applicant convicted
of such a crime may have the experience and training required by the
qualification standards, he or she is not eligible for consideration or
appointment.
|
J. |
SUITABILITY. An employee or an applicant is considered
suitable for Federal employment if there is no information available
concerning conduct that could reasonably be expected to interfere with
the Agency's ability to discharge its responsibilities. Suitability
determinations are governed by 5 CFR 731, HHS and IHS instructions, case
law, and other requirements.
|
(1) |
The composition of promotion panels will be determined
by the SPO with advice and guidance from selecting officials. Panels will
normally consist of at least two voting members. Insofar as possible,
panel membership should include diverse representation. A representative
of the SPO will provide advice and assistance. The selecting official will
not serve as a panel member.
|
(2) |
The panel members must have a working knowledge of the
position being filled. Where practicable, at least one member should be a representative
from a different organizational segment than that supervised by the selecting
official.
|
(3) |
The SPO will provide any necessary training on
evaluation methods, procedures, and regulatory requirements.
|
(4) |
Candidates will be ranked according to their numerical
score. When panels are used, the total points assigned to the candidates
by individual panel members will be added together and averaged to arrive at a
point score for each candidate.
|
B. |
NON-INDIAN PREFERENCE CANDIDATES. When the applicant pool includes
qualified Indian and non-Indian applicants, the non-Indian candidates will not
be rated. Instead, they should be notified that their applications could not be
considered because of Indian preference requirements.
|
C. |
RANKED CANDIDATES. Based on the results of the promotion panel, the
top scoring candidates are certified as best qualified and referred to the
selecting official.
|
D. |
COMMISSIONED CORPS CANDIDATES. When commissioned corps candidates
apply for specific vacancies, they will be evaluated as follows. Indian
candidates will be evaluated by the SPO against the Preston Standard, the billet qualifications, or the OPM standard if no Preston Standard exists. If they are found to be qualified, they may be referred
to the selecting official. If one is selected, the action will be referred to the Division of Commissioned Personnel
(DCP) for final processing. If no Indian candidates are located for the vacancy by any means, non-Indian officers will have their qualifications evaluated by the SPO against the qualification requirements of the billet and referred to the selecting official for consideration.
Note: Regardless of which standard is used, commissioned corps officers must meet any selective factors established for the position. It is up to the officer
to submit sufficient information to permit the SPO to determine whether he or she meets the qualification requirements including selective factors.
When officers are referred
to the selecting official, they are identified as "Referral for Consideration Under the Commissioned Corps Personnel System," listing the candidates by name (in alphabetical order), category, rank, title
of present billet, and organizational location. If selected, a completed form 1662,
"Request for Personnel Action," will be sent by the SPO
to the DCP.
If the qualifications determination by the SPO
is questioned by the selecting official or program, the selecting official or program may request that the SPO ask the Commissioned Personnel Support Team,
DHR, Office of Management Support, IHS, for a determination with regard
to qualifying a commissioned officer for a particular position.
In addition to those commissioned corps applicants who may have applied to the
SPO for a position, a program or selecting official may request that the DCP
refer officers who have expressed an interest in the area where the position is
located.
|
E. |
OTHER CANDIDATES. Other sources of candidates include:
|
A. |
INDIAN PREFERENCE. A selecting official may not select a non-Indian
preference candidate where at least one Indian preference candidate from any
source was considered qualified. The only valid reason for permitting
non-selection of a person designated as an Indian preference eligible is a
determination that the individual is, in fact, ineligible for preference, not
qualified or eligible for the position, or not suitable for employment in the
position to be filled, or other reasons indicated in Part 7, Chapter 3, "Indian
Preference," IHM, or succeeding instructions.
|
B. |
PUBLIC LAW 94-437 SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS. Indian Health
Service scholarship recipients who have completed the necessary
requirements for a health profession degree in accordance with their
academic institution and under the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA) will receive highest priority placement consideration for available vacancies within the IHS. This policy reaffirms the IHS commitment to fully recognize the continuing health care needs among AI/AN people and
to make use of the professionally trained health care providers upon completion of their
scholarship program. Within the context of this policy, bona-fide
employment consideration will be given to IHCIA scholarship recipients
for positions in the health profession disciplines for which they are
trained and qualified. Any IHCIA scholarship recipient may be
placed without regard to any competitive personnel system, agency
personnel limitation, or Indian preference policy.
|
C. |
NON-MERIT FACTORS. The selecting official may select or
non-select from among the candidates referred on the Certificate of
Eligibles. (See Manual Exhibit 7-2-F.)
However, the selection will be made without regard
to any non-merit factors. These include such factors as: race, color, sex, national origin, non-disqualifying physical handicap, marital status, age,
or political, religious, or labor organization affiliation or non-affiliation. Non-merit factors do not include rights extended under the "Indian Reorganization Act" with regards
to Indian preference.
|
D. |
SOURCES OF SELECTION. Selections may be made from a
variety of sources as long as Indian preference requirements are met,
e.g., a candidate for promotion, reassignment, transfer, or
reinstatement when the action is excepted from competitive promotion
procedures, a commissioned corps officer referred through DCP; a list of candidates who have been reached for certification and selection from a competitive examination and available for appointment; or a candidate (person with a disability,
VRA, etc.) available through a special appointment authority.
|
E. |
PLACEMENT CONSIDERATION. Employees entitled to placement
consideration under the provisions of HHS Personnel Instruction 335-2
(Placement program for employees on retained grade or pay), and in
accordance with Indian preference requirements, and who are among the
best qualified for a particular vacancy at the level of their retained
grade, must be selected in preference to other employees whose names
appear on the best qualified list, unless an exception is granted in
accordance with guidelines of HHS Personnel Instruction 335-2 or
succeeding instructions.
[Note: The HHS gave the Operating Divisions of the Department
the option to continue using Instruction 335-2 or to develop their own
procedures to place employees on retained grade. The IHS has
chosen to continue following the procedures in Instruction 335-2.]
|
F. |
DECISION TO FILL. The selecting official may decide not
to fill the position as announced or to fill it at a later date.
|
G. |
INTERVIEWS. Interviews are not required, but selecting
officials are encouraged to interview, whenever feasible, all candidates
who are referred.
|
H. |
VOID CERTIFICATE. If a selection is not made from among
the promotion candidates within 30 calendar days after the date the
Certificate of Eligibles was issued, the certificate will become void
unless the SPO extends the expiration date.
|
I. |
ADDITIONAL OR ALTERNATIVE SELECTION. Additional or
alternate selections may be made within 90 days of the date the
Certificate of Eligibles was issued, provided the positions to be filled
have the same title, series, grade, are in the same geographic location
as the position announced, and have the same qualification requirements.
|
J. |
ADVERTISED AT MORE THAN ONE GRADE LEVEL. If a position
is advertised at more than one grade level, selection may be made at any
level providing there is compliance with the Indian preference policy in
the selection process. A non-Indian may not be referred or selected at
one grade level if there is a qualified Indian available at any one of
the grade levels advertised.
|
K. |
LESS THAN SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE SELECTION. Selection of an employee whose performance appraisal is
less than fully satisfactory is not prohibited, but selecting officials should make such selections with extreme care. (See 7-2.7G
for a discussion of the relationship between unsatisfactory performance appraisals and qualifications determinations.)
|
L. |
REFERENCE CHECKS. The selecting official does not have
to document the reason for selection or non-selection, but must document
reference checks on the selected applicant. (See Supervisor's Guide for
Conducting Reference Checks-issued 1991.)
|
(4) |
Annotation of the crediting plan used.
|
(5) |
Vacancy announcement and any amendments issued.
|
(6) |
List of applications received. Manual
Exhibit 7-2-A.)
|
(7) |
Priority consideration documentation (if appropriate).
|
(8) |
Applications of all candidates (including selectee).
|
(9) |
Employees' performance appraisals.
|
(10) |
Evaluation forms showing the rating and ranking of each candidate.
(Manual Exhibit 7-2-C,
7-2-D, and 7-2-E)
|
(11) |
Certificate of Eligibles showing the names of candidates who are in the
group from which selection was made, the name of the selectee and the
signature of the selecting official. (Manual Exhibit
7-2-F)
|
(12) |
Merit Promotion File Checklist (Manual Exhibit
7-2-G)
|