NITAAC IAC Meeting

 

Thursday, November 18, 2004

Bldg. 6011 Executive Blvd.

Conference Room 605K

11:30 A.M. - 1:00 P.M.

 

 

Attendees:

 

Ms. Diane McLaughlin, BearingPoint

Mr. Rusty Walls with, CSC

Ms. Stuart Kramer with, SRA

Mr. Victor Powers, NITAAC

Mr. Greg Holliday, CIO-SP2

Ms. Millicent Manning, ECS3

Mr. Donald Wilson, IW2

Ms. June Evans, OA

 

Agenda Items:

 

  1. LMI Balance Score Card Survey

 

The CIO-SP2 briefing will be held on 11-18-04 at 2:30 P.M.  Victor reported that so far the report produced positive outcomes regarding NITAAC. The Committee recommended that NITAAC conduct Prime Vendor Surveys in the future.

 

  1. Program Enhancement Reviews

 

The Program Enhancement Reviews were initiated by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).  Clifton Gunderson performed the first review that focused on how the three contracts process orders.  Letters went out to the Primes notifying them of the reviews.  LMI will conduct the second part of the review. They are scheduled to complete the second review by February 2005.

 

  1. Marketing Strategy

 

NITAAC and June Evans are working together to construct a Statement of Work to outsource NITAAC’s marketing activities. The Committee mentioned that the Primes should help with shaping the marketing goals and objectives.  Victor mentioned that the NITAAC Program is in need of a spokesperson.  The Committee suggested that a Government employee should always serve as the spokesperson.  In addition, the Committee agreed that a successful marketing strategy takes commitment from both sides.  Furthermore, the Primes suggested that a high level Government figure, such as David Ramos should talk with the Primes and let them know how much NITAAC needs their help and participation.

 

NIH Executive Agent Designation Status

 

The Executive Agent Contract Activity Report is due December 15, 2004.  It was mentioned that preparation underway and on schedule.

 

IT Systems Enhancements

 

NITAAC system enhancements are still in progress.  Mr. Holliday indicated that

Development efforts continue on the Electronic Government Ordering System (e-GOS). Implementation of the new system is scheduled for October 1, 2005.  NITAAC plans to use focus groups consisting of vendors and customers to test the system.  Committee members discussed GSA’s ordering system and its ineffectiveness.  The vendors recommended that NITAAC check out GSA’s electronic ordering system to avoid similar pitfalls.  Also, the Committee recommended that NITAAC give a presentation to the vendors on the new system.  IW2 will have the same delivery order system as ECS3—coming soon!

 

IAC Membership/ Partnership

 

Victor asked the question, “How do we improve the IAC membership?” to the Committee.  Esther Burgess has served in the capacity as IAC Co-chair for over 2 years and is stepping down as IAC Co-chair effective immediately.  The IAC plans to recognize Esther for the fantastic job she has done over the years.  Victor stated that we need to solicit for a new co-chair.  However, the Committee stated that in the past the Chair and the Co-chair would get together and recommend someone and offer them the position.  The Committee agreed that we should continue the established tradition, and if the recommended individual declines the offer, the IAC would then solicit for a new 
Co-chair.  
 
Victor talked to Max Peterson with CDWG and he wants to participate on the IAC.  The Committee recommended that the IAC only allow Program Managers to serve on the IAC.  Program Managers do not come and go as quickly as Sales Representatives; therefore, the members would remain longer and have a vested interest in the contract vehicles’ success.  The Committee recommended the following criteria for selecting an IAC Co-chair—
 
·         Someone who has participated on the IAC in the past
·         Demonstrate commitment to the IAC
·         Synergy with Government leadership
·         Demonstrate leadership in the IT industry
 
The Committee will make sure that the roles & responsibilities of the Co-chair are clearly defined.  In addition, the Committee will look back at previous quarterly meetings and gather information that demonstrates how the IAC can add value to Industry.
 
Once the IAC Co-chair is selected the Committee will revisit the IAC Charter.  The Committee recommended that we review the Charter yearly to see if it needs updating.  Victor said he would confer with David Ramos concerning a proposed new IAC 
Co-chair.
 
Contract Performance
 
·         CIO-SP2 reported 326 orders and $911 million.
·         IW2 reported 413 order (38 task orders and 375 delivery orders) and $92.5 million.
·         ECS3 reported 23,356 orders and $412 million.   
 
Other IAC Business
 
·         Continue to have NITAAC connect with GSA and other GWAC offices.
·         Consider having David Ramos sit on forums with other Customer Service Centers.  The Primes are willing to help NITAAC with setting up the forums.  However, the idea should go to the IAC first for input.
·         DOD has issued a new set of guidelines.  Rusty Walls will send them out to the Committee.
 
The meeting adjourned.

 

Back