Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, and Paclitaxel With or Without Filgrastim in Treating Women With Inflammatory or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsors and Collaborators: Southwest Oncology Group
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Information provided by: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00016406
  Purpose

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether combination chemotherapy is more effective with or without filgrastim in treating breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combining doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel with or without filgrastim in treating women who have inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer.


Condition Intervention Phase
Breast Cancer
Drug: cyclophosphamide
Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride
Drug: filgrastim
Drug: paclitaxel
Procedure: conventional surgery
Procedure: neoadjuvant therapy
Phase III

Genetics Home Reference related topics: breast cancer
MedlinePlus related topics: Breast Cancer Cancer
Drug Information available for: Doxorubicin Doxorubicin hydrochloride Cyclophosphamide Filgrastim Paclitaxel Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
U.S. FDA Resources
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Active Control
Official Title: A Comparative Randomized Study of Standard Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Weekly Paclitaxel Vs. Weekly Doxorubicin and Daily Oral Cyclophosphamide Plus G-CSF Followed by Weekly Paclitaxel As Neoadjuvant Therapy For Inflammatory and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Further study details as provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI):

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Comparison of microscopic pathologic response rates [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Toxicity [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Comparison of delivered dose intensity [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Correlation of microscopic pathologic complete response with clinical complete response at the primary tumor site [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Study Start Date: May 2001
Detailed Description:

OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare the microscopic pathologic response rates in women with inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer treated with standard neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel vs weekly doxorubicin and daily oral cyclphosphamide with filgrastim (G-CSF) followed by weekly paclitaxel.
  • Compare the toxic effects of these regimens in this patient population.
  • Compare the delivered dose intensity of these regimens in this patient population.
  • Evaluate the association between microscopic pathologic complete response and clinical complete response at the primary tumor site in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease status (inflammatory vs other). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients receive doxorubicin IV followed by cyclophosphamide IV on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for a total of 5 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Three weeks after completion of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, patients receive paclitaxel IV over 1 hour weekly on day 1 for a total of 12 weeks.
  • Arm II: Patients receive doxorubicin IV on day 1, oral cyclophosphamide on days 1-7, and filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously on days 2-7. Treatment repeats weekly for a total of 15 courses of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide and 16 courses of G-CSF in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. One week after completion of G-CSF, patients receive paclitaxel as in arm I.

Within 3-6 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, patients with stable or responsive disease undergo surgical resection of tumor and affected nodes.

After surgery, patients may receive radiotherapy or additional chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy at the discretion of the treating physician.

Patients are followed every 6 months for 1 year and then annually for 4 years.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 350 patients (175 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 3 years.

  Eligibility

Genders Eligible for Study:   Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer

    • Stage IIB (T3, N0, M0), IIIA (T3, N1-2, M0 or T0-2, N2, M0), or IIIB (T4, any N, M0 or any T, N3, M0)
    • Unresectable or otherwise appropriate for neoadjuvant therapy
    • Confirmed by core needle or incisional biopsy

      • Punch biopsy allowed if invasive disease is documented
  • No distant metastases
  • Hormone receptor status:

    • Not specified

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

  • Not specified

Sex:

  • Female

Menopausal status:

  • Not specified

Performance status:

  • Zubrod 0-2

Life expectancy:

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic:

  • Absolute neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm^3
  • Platelet count at least 100,000/mm^3

Hepatic:

  • Bilirubin no greater than upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • SGOT or SGPT no greater than 2 times ULN

Renal:

  • Creatinine no greater than ULN

Cardiovascular:

  • No congestive heart failure or angina pectoris
  • LVEF greater than lower limit of normal

Other:

  • No other malignancy within the past 5 years except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
  • HIV negative
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy:

  • Not specified

Chemotherapy:

  • No prior chemotherapy for breast cancer

Endocrine therapy:

  • No prior hormonal therapy for breast cancer

Radiotherapy:

  • No prior radiotherapy for breast cancer

Surgery:

  • No prior definitive surgery for breast cancer

Other:

  • No other concurrent anticancer therapy
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00016406

  Show 314 Study Locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
Southwest Oncology Group
Investigators
Study Chair: Georgiana K. Ellis, MD Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
  More Information

Clinical trial summary from the National Cancer Institute's PDQ® database  This link exits the ClinicalTrials.gov site

Publications of Results:
Slovak ML, Bedell V, Lew D, et al.: Screening for clonal hematopoiesis as a predictive marker for development of t-AML following adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (S0012). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-11051, 2007.
Ellis GK, Green SJ, Russell CA, et al.: SWOG 0012, a randomized phase III comparison of standard doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) followed by weekly paclitaxel (T) versus weekly doxorubicin and daily oral cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF (G) followed by weekly paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therapy for inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-LBA537, 2006.

Study ID Numbers: CDR0000068630, SWOG-S0012
Study First Received: May 6, 2001
Last Updated: July 23, 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00016406  
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government

Keywords provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI):
stage II breast cancer
stage IIIA breast cancer
stage IIIB breast cancer
stage IIIC breast cancer
inflammatory breast cancer

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Inflammatory breast cancer
Skin Diseases
Paclitaxel
Breast Neoplasms
Cyclophosphamide
Doxorubicin
Breast Diseases

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Immunologic Factors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Antineoplastic Agents
Mitosis Modulators
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Antimitotic Agents
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic
Immunosuppressive Agents
Pharmacologic Actions
Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Therapeutic Uses
Tubulin Modulators
Myeloablative Agonists
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
Antirheumatic Agents
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
Alkylating Agents

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on January 16, 2009