Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
Impact of an Automated Telephone Intervention on Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Type 2 Diabetes
This study has been completed.
Sponsors and Collaborators: University of Minnesota
Novo Nordisk
Information provided by: University of Minnesota
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00700908
  Purpose

Aim 1. Determine the impact of a daily, automated telephone intervention on HbA1c levels compared to standard care in older patients with type 2 diabetes.

Aim 2. Determine the impact of the automated telephone intervention compared to standard care on adherence to prescribed SMBG frequency in older patients with type 2 diabetes.

Aim 3. Determine the impact of the automated telephone intervention compared to standard care on self-reported diabetic control problems in older patients with type 2 diabetes.

Aim 4. Determine the impact of the automated telephone intervention compared to standard care on self-reported attitudes and health beliefs concerning diabetes in older patients with type 2 diabetes


Condition Intervention
Type 2 Diabetes
Behavioral: automated telephone intervention vs. usual care

MedlinePlus related topics: Diabetes
U.S. FDA Resources
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Official Title: The Impact of an Automated Telephone Intervention on HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Further study details as provided by University of Minnesota:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Change in HbA1c [ Time Frame: three months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Change in adherence to SMBG frequency [ Time Frame: three months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Enrollment: 120
Study Start Date: June 2007
Study Completion Date: June 2008
Primary Completion Date: June 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
1: Experimental
Automated telephone intervention
Behavioral: automated telephone intervention vs. usual care
2: Active Comparator
Usual care
Behavioral: automated telephone intervention vs. usual care

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   55 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age greater or equal to 55
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • English speaking
  • Ability to use glucose meter

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Unwilling to allow SMBG levels to be shard with primary care physician
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00700908

Locations
United States, Minnesota
Primary Care Center University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Minnesota
Novo Nordisk
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Judith Graziano, PhD, RN University of Minnesota
  More Information

Responsible Party: University of Minnesota ( Judith A. Graziano, RN, PhD candidate )
Study ID Numbers: 0701M99406
Study First Received: June 17, 2008
Last Updated: June 18, 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00700908  
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by University of Minnesota:
type 2 diabetes
telephone intervention
automated

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Metabolic Diseases
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Diabetes Mellitus
Endocrine System Diseases
Endocrinopathy
Metabolic disorder
Glucose Metabolism Disorders

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on January 16, 2009