Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
Effectiveness of the Acute Respiratory Infection Smart Form
This study is not yet open for participant recruitment.
Verified by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), October 2005
Sponsored by: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Information provided by: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00235040
  Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of the Acute Respiratory Infection Smart Form


Condition Intervention
Respiratory Tract Infections
Behavioral: Antibiotic prescribing rates

MedlinePlus related topics: Antibiotics
U.S. FDA Resources
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment
Official Title: Evaluating Smart Forms and Quality Dashboards in an EHR: Effectiveness of the Acute Respiratory Infection Smart Form

Further study details as provided by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ):

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Antibiotic prescribing rates

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing, re-visit rates, antibiotic costs, use of antibiotics, all-cause antibiotic use, quality of documentation

Estimated Enrollment: 20000
Study Start Date: November 2005
Estimated Study Completion Date: August 2007
Detailed Description:

Specific Aim 1: To design and implement an integrated documentation-based clinical decision support and physician feedback system, provided in an electronic health record (EHR), to improve the management of patients with acute medical conditions.

Hypothesis 1: A documentation-based clinical decision support tool (CDSS) “smart form” physician feedback system, can be designed and implemented to facilitate documentation and physician order-entry, provide individualized, evidence-based recommendations for the management of patients acute respiratory infections (ARIs), and are usable by primary care physicians.

Specific Aim 2: To determine the effectiveness of documentation-based CDSS and physician feedback on documentation and the clinical management of patients respiratory tract infections.

Hypothesis 2A: A documentation-based CDSS “smart form” will increase the documentation of important clinical data in patients with ARI when compared to usual practice.

Hypothesis 2B: A documentation-based CDSS “smart form” will increase adherence with guidelines for the management of patients with ARI when compared to usual practice.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients of physicians participating in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

Any patients who are not part of a panel of a participating physician

  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00235040

Contacts
Contact: Lana Tsurikova, MA rtsurikova@partneras.org
Contact: Jeffrey A. Linder, MD, MPH jlinder@partners.org

Sponsors and Collaborators
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Blackford Middleton, MD, MPH, MSc Partners Healthcare Systems Inc
  More Information

Study ID Numbers: R01HS015169-1, R01 HS015169
Study First Received: October 6, 2005
Last Updated: October 7, 2005
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00235040  
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government

Keywords provided by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ):
Upper Respiratory Infections
Respiratory Tract Infections
Tree Number C01.539.739
Tree Number C08.730
Unique ID D012141

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Respiratory Tract Infections

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Communicable Diseases
Infection

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on January 16, 2009