Comparison of Uterine Exteriorization Versus in Situ Repair at Cesarean Section: a Randomized Clinical Trial - Full Text View

Comparison of Uterine Exteriorization Versus in Situ Repair at Cesarean Section: a Randomized Clinical Trial (EXT)

This study has been completed.

Sponsored by:	Instituto Materno Infantil Prof. Fernando Figueira
Information provided by:	Instituto Materno Infantil Prof. Fernando Figueira
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT00550888

Purpose

There is no difference between extra-abdominal or in situ suture of the uterus in cesarean section.

Condition	Intervention	Phase
Uterus Cesarean Section Abdominal Delivery Suture Techniques	Procedure: suture techniques	Phase III

MedlinePlus related topics: Cesarean Section Nausea and Vomiting

Study Type:	Interventional
Study Design:	Randomized, Single Blind (Subject), Parallel Assignment

Further study details as provided by Instituto Materno Infantil Prof. Fernando Figueira:

Primary Outcome Measures:

Secondary Outcome Measures:

nausea and vomiting during surgery, mean operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, number of surgical sutures for uterine repair, pain postoperative, number of postoperative analgesic doses, surgical site infection [ Time Frame: from surgery to 30 days after surgery ]

Study Start Date:	August 2005
Study Completion Date:	August 2007

Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:	13 Years to 44 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:	Female

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Exclusion Criteria:

Contacts and Locations

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00550888

Locations

Sponsors and Collaborators

Instituto Materno Infantil Prof. Fernando Figueira

Investigators

Study Director:

Eronildo F Silva

IMIP

More Information

Study ID Numbers:	IMIP1234
Study First Received:	October 29, 2007
Last Updated:	October 29, 2007
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT00550888
Health Authority:	Brazil: Ministry of Health

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on January 15, 2009