Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
Clinical Comparison of the LTS-D, ETC and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, January 2009
Sponsored by: The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Information provided by: The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00581386
  Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new supra-glottic airway device, the "Disposable Laryngeal Tube Suction" (LTS-D; King Systems, Noblesville, IN). We propose to test its ease of insertion, position within the airway, patency of drain tube and anatomic sealing properties during spontaneous ventilation in anesthetized patients. The study device will be compared to the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA, LMA North America Inc.) and the Esophageal Tracheal Combitube (ETC; Tyco Healthcare/Mallinckrodt Nellcor, Pleasanton, Calif).


Condition Intervention
Intubation
Endotracheal
Device: Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable (LTS-D)
Device: ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway
Device: Esophageal Tracheal Combitube

MedlinePlus related topics: Esophagus Disorders
U.S. FDA Resources
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Subject), Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Official Title: A Randomized Clinical Comparison Of The King Systems Disposable Laryngeal Tube Suction (LTS-D), The Esophageal Tracheal Combitube (ETC) And The Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) In Adult Patients

Further study details as provided by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Time and number of attempts required; [ Time Frame: duration of intubation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Level of difficulty for intubation [ Time Frame: duration of intubation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Degree of irritation of the pharynx, epiglottis, and arytenoids [ Time Frame: post operative, immediately and 24 hours later ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • vital signs, oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide [ Time Frame: duration of intubation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

Estimated Enrollment: 225
Study Start Date: August 2007
Estimated Study Completion Date: June 2009
Estimated Primary Completion Date: June 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Intervention Details:
    Device: Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable (LTS-D)
    supra-glottic airway device
    Device: ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway
    pre-existing double-lumen supra-glottic device
    Device: Esophageal Tracheal Combitube
    disposable double-lumen tube
  Show Detailed Description

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 80 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The subjects will be adult surgical candidates aged 18-80, ASA I-III, Mallampati I or II, presenting for elective surgery who require general anesthesia in whom tracheal intubation is not necessary.
  2. Both male and female patients will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded from the study if they present as Mallampati III or IV, ASA IV-V or emergency status. Additionally, they will be excluded if they meet one of the contraindication criteria of the LMA ProSeal including:

    1. Obesity
    2. Pregnancy
    3. History of gastric regurgitation, heart burn, ileus or "full stomach"
    4. History of low pulmonary compliance or high pulmonary resistance
    5. Known history of difficult endotracheal intubation or signs suggesting the possibility of difficult intubation
    6. Pharyngeal pathology or
    7. Upper airway obstruction due to laryngeal pathology.
  • Additionally, they will be excluded if they meet one of the contraindication criteria for the Combitube including:

    1. Intact gag reflexes
    2. Height <4 feet
    3. Central airway obstruction
    4. Recent ingestion of caustic substances
    5. Known esophageal pathology, or
    6. Known latex allergy.
  • They will also be excluded if any tracheal disease is present such as tracheal tumors, stenosis or previous tracheal surgery.
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00581386

Contacts
Contact: Carin A. Hagberg, M.D. 713.500.6195 carin.a.hagberg@uth.tmc.edu
Contact: Dawn G Iannucci, M.S. II 713.500.6195 dawn.iannucci@uth.tmc.edu

Locations
United States, Texas
Memorial Hermann Hospital Recruiting
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
Contact: Carin A Hagberg, M.D.     713-500-6240     carin.a.hagberg@uth.tmc.edu    
Principal Investigator: Carin A Hagberg, MD            
Sub-Investigator: Nicholas C Lam, MD            
Sponsors and Collaborators
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Carin A. Hagberg, M.D. The University of Texas Medical School at Houston
  More Information

Responsible Party: The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston ( Carin Hagberg, M.D./ Professor and Vice Chair )
Study ID Numbers: HSC-MS-04-254
Study First Received: December 20, 2007
Last Updated: January 6, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00581386  
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston:
Endotracheal Intubation
Supraglottic Airway

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Esophageal disorder
Esophageal Diseases

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on January 13, 2009