Skip Navigation HRSA - U.S Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Service Administration U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Home
Questions
Order Publications
 
Grants Find Help Service Delivery Data Health Care Concerns About HRSA
The Health Center Program:

Program Assistance Letter
Understanding the Health Care Needs of Homeless Youth

 
 

 

Peoples Health Center Homeless Initiative Program

1835 North Meridian Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
Contact: Melissa Brown
Phone: (317) 931-3055
Key words: prenatal care; computerized records

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not the use of a computerized reporting system for a two-person prenatal care coordination team would increase the quality and quantity of data collected, and thereby allow for a better coordination of care.

METHODS
The Homeless Initiative Program (HIP) created a computerized records system to allow for greater ease in maintaining encounter information, especially that related to pre- and postnatal information. Typically, information was put into the database via a laptop computer. The database was constructed in Microsoft Access. Three main categories of information were kept on clients: 1) profile (e.g., gender, age, race/ethnicity); 2) pregnancy (e.g., estimated date of delivery, date prenatal care initiated); and 3) encounter (e.g., current address, Medicaid status). In the design of the system, simplicity and flexibility were emphasized to help maximize the effectiveness of the data entry process. Referrals to the HIP Prenatal Care Coordination Team (PCCT) were made from the HIP Medical Team, social service agencies, womens shelters, the county health department and other organizations. Clients of the HIP/PCCT were typically seen five to seven times before the birth, beginning early in the second trimester. From birth through the infants first year of age, clients were seen at least on a quarterly basis, but many of them on a weekly basis. Program staff were required to make certain that all client information was entered into the system within one week of the clients visit. Several attempts (e.g., identifying other HIP clients who were not PCCT clients and other similar populations at other locations) were made to identify a comparison group to allow for a more complete evaluation of the HIP/PCCT and its effect on clients, but all attempts were unsuccessful.

RESULTS

Using the computer made it possible to obtain the following information: 36 records were available for HIP/PCCT clients in 1997. Regarding these 36 pregnancies, gestation ranged from 33 to 43 weeks; birth weights ranged from 3 pounds and 4 ounces to 8 pounds and 8 ounces; 8 infants required hospitalization (primarily because they were premature); and 2 were stillborn due to complications related to their umbilical cords.

DISCUSSION

No single person was available to complete all the data entry work on a regular basis. To allow for the maximum amount of benefits from the use of the computer, it is perhaps best to have one individual who is able to devote much, if not all, of his or her time to this process. In addition, no matter how much data is input into the system, it will not benefit the clients unless regular data analyses and checks are run on it. Although the information obtained from this study was somewhat limited, it has encouraged HIP staff to think more about data issues and, more importantly, how collecting the right data and analyzing it can help ensure that the best possible and most appropriate care can be given to clients.

CONCLUSION

Computerized records have the potential to allow for more complete and consistent data collection that can ultimately lead to better service provision for clients.