Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines
John PA Ioannidis 1–3,*, Paolo Boffetta 4, Julian Little 5, Thomas R O’Brien 6, Andre G Uitterlinden7, Paolo Vineis 8, David J Balding 8 Anand Chokkalingam 9, Siobhan M Dolan 10, W Dana Flanders 11, Julian PT Higgins 12, Mark I McCarthy 13,14, David H McDermott 15, Grier P Page 16, Timothy R Rebbeck 174, Daniela Seminara 18 and Muin J Khoury 19
International Journal of Epidemiology 2008; 37(1):120-132
|
|
FIGURE 1: Categories for the credibility of cumulative epidemiological evidence. The three letters correspond (in order) to amount of evidence, replication and protection from bias. Evidence is categorized as strong, when there is A for all three items, and is categorized as weak when there is a C for any of the three items. All other combinations are categorized as moderate
<< back to publication
|