Restricted versus liberal oxygen exposure for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm or low birth weight infants

Askie LM, Henderson-Smart DJ

Background - Methods - Results - Characteristics of Included Studies - References - Data Tables & Graphs


Cover sheet

Title

Restricted versus liberal oxygen exposure for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm or low birth weight infants

Reviewers

Askie LM, Henderson-Smart DJ

Dates

Date edited: 17/08/2001
Date of last substantive update: 16/07/2001
Date of last minor update: / /
Date next stage expected / /
Protocol first published: Issue 2, 1998
Review first published: Issue 2, 1999

Contact reviewer

Ms Lisa M Askie
Trial coordinator
NSW Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research
Building D02
UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY
NSW AUSTRALIA
2006
Telephone 1: + 61 2 9351 7739
Telephone 2: + 61 410 570 735
Facsimile: + 61 2 9351 7742
E-mail: lisa.askie@perinatal.usyd.edu.au
URL: http://www.psn.org.au/
Secondary contact person's name: Professor David Henderson-Smart

Contribution of reviewers

Intramural sources of support

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sydney, AUSTRALIA
NSW Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, University of Sydney, AUSTRALIA

Extramural sources of support

Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Sydney, AUSTRALIA

What's new

This review updates the existing review "Restricted versus liberal oxygen for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm or low birth weight infants" which was published in the Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2001. The background section has additional references; The STOP-ROP 2000, trial previously listed as ongoing, has now been listed as an excluded trial and will be included in another Cochrane systematic review entitled "Supplemental oxygen in the treatment of pre-threshold retinopathy of prematurity" (Lloyd J, Askie LM, Smith J, Tarnow-Mordi WO); a synopsis and a background section to the abstract have also been added. No new trials were identified as a result of the most recent search, and hence no substantive changes have been made to either the results or conclusions of the review.

Dates

Date review re-formatted: 23/09/1999
Date new studies sought but none found: 13/07/2001
Date new studies found but not yet included/excluded: / /
Date new studies found and included/excluded: / /
Date reviewers' conclusions section amended: 13/07/2001
Date comment/criticism added: / /
Date response to comment/criticisms added: / /

Text of review

Synopsis

Restricting oxygen supplementation significantly reduces the rate and severity of vision problems (retinopathy) in premature and low birthweight babies

Babies born either prematurely (before 37 weeks) or with a low birthweight often have breathing problems and need extra oxygen. Oxygen supplementation has provided many benefits for these babies but can cause damage to the eyes (retinopathy) and lungs. The review of trials found that unrestricted oxygen supplementation has these potential adverse effects without any clear benefits. Restricted oxygen significantly reduces these risks. More research is needed to find the best level of supplementation.

Abstract

Background

Whilst the use of supplemental oxygen has a long history in neonatal care, resulting in both significant health care benefits and harms, uncertainty remains as to the most appropriate range to target blood oxygen levels in preterm and low birth weight infants. Potential benefits of higher oxygen targeting include more stable sleep patterns and improved long term growth and development. However, there may be significant deleterious pulmonary effects and health service use implications resulting from such a policy.

Objectives

In preterm or low birth weight infants, does targeting ambient oxygen concentration to achieve a lower versus higher blood oxygen range, or administering restricted versus liberal supplemental oxygen, influence mortality, retinopathy of prematurity, lung function, growth or development?

Search strategy

The standard search strategy of the Neonatal Review Group was used. An additional literature search was conducted of the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases in order to locate any trials in addition to those provided by the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL/CCTR).

Selection criteria

All trials in preterm or low birth weight infants utilising random or quasi-random patient allocation, in which ambient oxygen concentrations were targeted to achieve a lower versus higher blood oxygen range, or restricted versus liberal oxygen was administered, were eligible for inclusion.

Data collection & analysis

The methodological quality of the eligible trials was assessed independently by each author for the degree selection, performance, attrition and detection bias. Data were extracted and reviewed independently by the each author. Data analysis was conducted according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

Main results

The restriction of oxygen significantly reduced the incidence and severity of retinopathy of prematurity without unduly increasing death rates in the meta-analysis of the five trials included in this review. The one trial that specifically addressed the question of lower versus higher PaO2 found no effect on death, but did not report (in sufficient detail to warrant inclusion) the effect of this intervention on eye or other outcomes. The effects of either of these oxygen administration policies on other clinically meaningful outcomes including chronic lung disease and long term growth, neurodevelopment, lung or visual function were not reported in any of the available trials.

Reviewers' conclusions

The results of this systematic review confirm the commonly held view of today's clinicians that a policy of unrestricted, unmonitored oxygen therapy has potential harms, without clear benefits. However, the question of what is the optimal target range for maintaining blood oxygen levels in preterm/LBW infants was not answered by the data available for inclusion in this review.

Background

The administration of supplemental oxygen has a long history in neonatal care. Its use in preterm and low birth weight infants suffering respiratory insufficiency has resulted in both significant health care benefits, such as reduced mortality and spastic diplegia (Avery 1960, McDonald 1963), but has also been associated with significant deleterious effects such as retinopathy of prematurity and lung toxicity (Duc 1992).

Improvements in technology in the past few decades have led to both the increased survival of preterm and low birth weight infants, and an ability to measure their oxygen levels more accurately. Despite the exceedingly common use of supplemental oxygen in this population of infants, there is little consensus as to the optimal mode of administration and appropriate levels of oxygen for maximising short or long term growth and development, whilst minimising harmful effects (Poets 1998, McIntosh 2001).

Uncertainty remains as to the most appropriate range to target blood oxygen levels in preterm and low birth weight infants. Usher (Usher 1973) examined the effect of targeting a lower versus higher range of PaO2 on death, the need for mechanical ventilation and other clinical outcomes and concluded there was no benefit in targeting a higher range, and there may in fact be deleterious respiratory effects (Coates 1982). A cohort study by Tin et al (Tin 2001) also suggested adverse respiratory outcomes and a significant increase in the incidence of ROP when higher O2 ranges were targeted in preterm infants. However, Phelps and Rosenbaum (Phelps 1984) demonstrated significantly more severe retinopathy in kittens recovering from hyperoxic-induced disease when allowed to recover in lower levels of ambient oxygen, suggesting that targeting higher blood oxygen levels may be beneficial to visual outcomes. The STOP-ROP trial (STOP-ROP 2000) found that higher O2 targeting did not significantly decrease the incidence of pre-threshold ROP progression, but did cause an exacerbation of adverse pulmonary events. The results of this trial will be included in a separate Cochrane review entitled: "Supplemental oxygen for the treatment of pre-threshold retinopathy of prematurity" (Lloyd J, Askie LM, Smith J, Tarnow-Mordi WO). The effects of either policy of oxygen administration on long term growth and development in preterm or low birth weight infants remains unknown.

Objectives

In preterm or low birth weight infants, does targeting ambient oxygen concentration to achieve a lower versus higher blood oxygen range, or administering restricted versus liberal supplemental oxygen, influence mortality, retinopathy of prematurity, lung function, growth or development?

A priori sub-group analyses:
- Method of oxygen monitoring.
- Infants born at different gestational age and birth weight subgroups: as there are differing baseline risks of the outcome measures in these subgroups.
- Time of discontinuation: early versus late discontinuation as this is hypothesized to influence outcome measures (Gunn 1980).
- Method of discontinuation: gradual versus abrupt discontinuation as this is hypothesized to influence outcome measures (Chan-Ling 1995).

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Only trials utilising random or quasi-random patient allocation were eligible for inclusion.

Types of participants

Preterm or low birth weight infants receiving supplemental oxygen.

Types of interventions

Restricted versus liberal administration of supplemental oxygen; or targeting a lower versus higher range of blood oxygen levels.

Types of outcome measures

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) - any, severe
Mortality - any, early, neonatal period
ROP (severe) or death (any)
Apnea of prematurity
Chronic lung disease/bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Growth - neonatal period, long term
Neurodevelopment - long term
Visual function - long term

Outcome data with attrition rates greater than 20% were not included in analyses.

Search strategy for identification of studies

The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. This includes searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL/CCTR), the Oxford Database of Perinatal trials, MEDLINE, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conferences and symposia proceedings, expert informants, journal handsearching mainly in the English language.

An additional literature search, using OVID software, was conducted of the MEDLINE (1966-July 2001) and CINAHL (1982-July 2001) databases in order to locate any trials in addition to those provided by the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL/CCTR). The search strategy involved various combinations of the following keywords, using the search fields of abstract, MeSH subject heading, exploded subject heading, floating subject heading, publication type, registry number word, subject heading word, text word, and title: oxygen, preterm, premature, neonate, newborn, infant, oxygen saturation, hypoxia, retinopathy of prematurity, retrolental fibroplasia, low birth weight, very low birth weight, extremely low birth weight, randomized controlled trial, controlled clinical trial, clinical trial, random allocation, placebo.

Methods of the review

The standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group were used to select trials, assess quality and extract and synthesise data. For each trial, each author independently assessed the methodologic quality and extracted the data from the report. Results were compared and differences resolved as required. Level of agreement between the two authors was greater than 90% in all cases. Eligible trials were assessed for the degree of selection, performance, attrition and detection bias. Additional information was requested from authors to clarify methodology or results as necessary.

Meta-analyses were carried out with use of relative risk (RR) and risk difference (RD). When appropriate, number needed to treat (1/RD) was calculated. The fixed effects "assumption free" model was used. Evaluation of heterogeneity, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were undertaken as appropriate.

Description of studies

The systematic review located five trials that addressed the question of targeting oxygen administration in preterm/LBW infants. Nine other studies were excluded from the analysis as they either did not address this particular question, or did not involve random allocation of one of the interventions under review.

Participants:
The enrolment period for the five included studies was between 1951-1969. This was during an early era of neonatal care, with therapies and practices quite different from modern "intensive" care, and included only small numbers of survivors with birth weights under 1000g who today carry the greatest mortality and morbidity burden. There was a wide range of birth weights amongst trial participants, from less than 1000 to 2500g. The largest trial (Kinsey 1956) only enrolled infants who survived beyond 48 hours, whilst the other four trials randomized infants on admission to the neonatal nursery. All trials used birthweight as an inclusion criteria. Two trials also selected infants for inclusion based on a diagnosis of respiratory distress syndrome (Usher 1973) or hypoxia/acidemia (Sinclair 1968).

Intervention:
Two trials (Usher 1973; Sinclair 1968) administered oxygen based on actual arterial or capillary blood oxygen levels. The other three trials were conducted in an era before accurate blood oxygen monitoring in infants was possible. As such, these trials could only test the effects of cruder measures of oxygenation, such as ambient oxygen concentration, and even these in only general terms, labelled "liberal" and "restricted" oxygen administration in this review.

All the included trials commenced the intervention in the early neonatal period, but continued it for a wide range of time: from 1 day to 7 weeks. As such, it is not possible from the data available to investigate the effect of the intervention in the early neonatal period (less than 1 week life) compared with the later neonatal period (1 week - 1 month age). When oxygen weaning was indicated, it was done so gradually in 2 trials, abruptly in 1 trial, and the method not specified in the remaining 2 trials.

Outcomes:
Outcome measures were assessed at time periods ranging from 2 days to 6 months. None of the included trials reported any valid short or long term effects of the interventions on either growth, neurodevelopment, lung function, or chronic lung disease. Coates 1982 reported some long term outcomes on infants from Usher's 1973 study. Unfortunately, he was only able to obtain outcome data for 23% of survivors, and in keeping with our a priori specification of only including outcome measures with 80% or greater ascertainment, these data are not included in the review.

The only eye outcome data reported in the included trials used the retrolental fibroplasia (RLF) classifications (Reese 1953). Vascular RLF stage 1 and cicatricial RLF grade II correspond approximately with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) stage 3 plus and stage 4 respectively, using the International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity system (Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity 1984, 1987) commonly used today. Ascertainment of RLF in the included trials was by direct ophthalmoscope, visualising the posterior pole only. The only findings that could be identified using this method were dilation and tortuosity of the retinal vessels ("plus disease", using the 1984 and 1987 classifications, as above). The more common findings in the anterior pole that can today be identified with indirect ophthalmoscopy were unable to be identified. Hence, even the least severe eye outcomes reported in this review equate with what today would be described as "threshold" ROP.

The largest trial (Kinsey 1956, n = 212) only enrolled infants who survived beyond 48 hours. Unfortunately, the second largest trial (Patz 1954, n = unknown, but greater than 120) did not report any mortality data and these data are not retrievable (Duc 1992 pp181-182).

Methodological quality of included studies

All included trials used either quasi-random or random patient allocation, had at least one clinically meaningful outcome, and were thus included in the analyses. The overall methodological quality of the included trials was fair.

Two of the trials had adequate allocation concealment: Kinsey 1956 used central telephone randomisation, and Sinclair 1968 used a method of sealed envelopes. Allocation concealment is unclear in the other three trials. Patz 1954 used quasi-random patient allocation. The other four trials were truly randomized. No trials blinded the intervention. Only Kinsey 1956 reported power calculations a priori. Four of the included studies had adequate short term outcome measure ascertainment. The Patz 1954 trial did not report deaths or losses, but it is assumed that outcome data were reported only on survivors and assessed by 6 months age.

Results

Summary of results:
In this meta-analysis, restricted compared with liberal oxygen administration significantly reduced the incidence of all forms of retrolental fibroplasia in survivors. Cicatricial RLF (any grade) was significantly reduced in surviving infants who were exposed to a restricted oxygen regime (RR 0.26, CI 0.11-0.58). There was also a significant reduction in the precursor, vascular RLF (any stage), in surviving infants exposed to restricted oxygen (RR 0.34, CI 0.25-0.46).

Neither restricted oxygen compared with liberal administration, nor lower versus higher PaO2, had significant independent effects on death rates, either in all preterm/LBW infants or in a sub-group of infants with birth weights less then 1250g. Restricted compared with liberal oxygen administration did, however, significantly reduce a combined measure of adverse outcome, death or RLF (vascular, any stage) (RR 0.59, CI 0.48-0.72). Thus, one would need to treat only 3 infants with restricted oxygen to prevent one infant from having the adverse outcome of death or RLF (NNT = 1/RD = 1/0.310 = 3.2). Restricted compared with liberal oxygen administration also reduced the more severe measure of adverse outcome, death or RLF (cicatricial, any grade) (RR 0.77, CI 0.56-1.07), although this result was not statistically significant.
No other outcome measures specified a priori as clinically meaningful were reported in enough detail or with satisfactory follow-up rates to be included in the analysis (chronic lung disease, long term growth, development, lung or visual function).

Sub-group analyses:
Only two of the a priori stated sub-group analyses were possible with the available data. The only reported effect of restricted versus liberal oxygen administration on infants with BW less than 1000g was a non-significant decrease in RLF (cicatricial, severe) in the Patz 1954 trial. This analysis was based on very small numbers, with uneven denominators in each group. This may reflect a difference in the number of survivors in the two groups resulting from deaths which were not accounted for by Patz 1954. This result should thus be interpreted with caution as the small numbers in this sub-group (as reflected by the wide confidence intervals) and non-reported deaths make any meaningful interpretation of these data difficult. A comparison of the effect of lower versus higher PaO2 in a sub-group of infants with BW less than 1250g demonstrated a result consistent with that in the group as a whole, i.e. no significant difference in death rates. It was not possible to undertake any of the other a priori specified sub-group analyses such as time or method of oxygen weaning, or method of oxygen monitoring, due to insufficient data.

Evaluation of heterogeneity:
No statistical heterogeneity was demonstrated in any of the outcome measures analysed that included more than one trial.

There was a degree of clinical heterogeneity amongst the five trials included in this review. All included trials contained a wide range of birthweights, followed infants for similar periods (all in the short term), used similar definitions of outcome measures, and implemented the interventions in the early neonatal period. However, there was a very wide range of exposure to the interventions under review (1 day - 7 weeks). Moreover, there were two distinct intervention comparisons included in the review (hence the division of comparisons into restricted versus liberal oxygen exposure and low versus high PaO2). The Kinsey 1956; Lanman 1954 and Patz 1954 trials were conducted in an early era of neonatal care where methods of oxygen monitoring and administration were crude in comparison to today's techniques and thus only restricted versus liberal oxygen exposure could be compared in these trials. The Usher 1973 and Sinclair 1968 trials used more modern techniques (including umbilical artery catheterisation, arterialised capillary sampling, micromethods for blood gases and acid-base) and thus comparisons of low versus high oxygen levels were possible with data from these trials.

Sensitivity analyses:
The results of the meta-analyses were tested for robustness with regard to study quality. We had stated a priori that trials containing outcome measures with greater than 20% attrition would not be included in the analysis. In one trial, Patz 1954, it was unclear whether outcome ascertainment was complete as attrition due to losses to followup and deaths were not reported. This, plus the fact that it was the only trial using a quasi-random method of patient allocation, led us to test the results without the inclusion of this trial.

There were three outcome measures that included data from the Patz 1954 trial. One was a sub-group analysis of RLF (cicatricial, severe) in infants with birthweights less than 1000g. Data from the Patz trial were the only data contributing to this analysis, so removing this trial would mean that there were no data for this outcome measure. The other two outcomes to which the Patz trial contributed were RLF (vascular, any stage) and RLF (cicatricial, severe grades). The results for neither of these outcome measures were significantly affected by the exclusion of the Patz trial. Hence, the results of these meta-analyses were not sensitive to the effect of study quality.

Discussion

The answer to the question of what is the optimal therapeutic range of PaO2 for preterm/LBW infants to maximise benefits, whilst minimising harms, remains uncertain.

Surprisingly, to date only one randomized trial (Usher 1973) has attempted to address this question directly. Sinclair 1968 assessed the effects of low versus high PaO2 and other co-interventions in a group of hypoxic, acidemic low birth weight infants. The related, but now historic, question of restricted versus liberal oxygen administration was addressed by three randomized trials in an era before accurate and/or continuous monitoring of infant blood oxygen levels was possible. Both interventions were included in this review, which addresses the general question of the effect of oxygen dose on outcomes for LBW/preterm infants.

Restricting oxygen exposure significantly reduced the incidence and severity of RLF without unduly increasing death rates in this meta-analysis. It should be noted, however, that the trial contributing the most data to this result (Kinsey 1956) did not enrol infants until at least 48 hours of age. The effect of restricted oxygen administration on early neonatal death cannot be reliably ascertained from the available data. The results of this trial have often been misinterpreted, with the resulting extrapolation of aggressive restriction of oxygen from birth leading to a substantial increase in mortality rates amongst preterm/low birthweight infants in the years following its publication (Cross 1973). It should also be noted that the second largest trial, Patz 1954, did not report any mortality data and this information is not retrievable (Duc 1992, pp 181-182). Unfortunately, the confidence intervals around the point estimate for this outcome are quite wide (RR 1.20, CI 0.80-1.80), and the addition of the Patz 1954 mortality data would have been most helpful in resolving this issue. It is possible that the difference in retrolental fibroplasia rates seen in survivors may be influenced by the trend toward excess deaths caused by the restricted oxygen policy.

The two trials (Sinclair 1968, Usher 1973) that addressed the question of lower versus higher PaO2 found no effect on death, but did not report (in sufficient detail to warrant inclusion) the effect of this intervention on eye or other outcomes. The effects of either of these oxygen administration policies on other clinically meaningful outcomes, including chronic lung disease, and long term growth, neurodevelopment, lung or visual function, were not reported in any of the available trials.

Since the publication of these trials, other authors have attempted to further investigate the association between RLF and PaO2 levels. A large, prospective, non-randomised study (Kinsey 1977) involving a detailed survey across five collaborating centres in the USA was undertaken between 1969 and 1972. No definitive relationship between PaO2 and the occurrence of RLF could be established. It should be noted that this analysis was undertaken using the limited information available from intermittent blood gas sampling. The study did find, however, an association between susceptibility to RLF and decreasing birthweight and increasing time in oxygen. However, no guidelines for the optimal range of PaO2 were suggested by this study.

The role of careful, continuous monitoring of oxygen levels on the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity has also been investigated by several authors since the publication of the studies included in this review. Bancalari and co-workers (Bancalari 1987a; Bancalari 1987b; Flynn 1987) conducted the only large randomized trial of continuous transcutaneous PO2 monitoring to date. This study showed no significant difference in the incidence or severity of ROP, mortality or chronic lung disease in the continuously monitored infants compared with those who received standard (intermittent) monitoring of PO2 levels. The utility of pulse oximetry monitoring in preventing adverse neonatal outcomes remains largely untested. The only controlled trial reported to date established the value of pulse oximetry in reducing major hypoxic events during anaesthesia among 152 children undergoing surgery (Cote 1988). No other experimental reports to date have assessed the effects of pulse oximetry monitoring on other neonatal outcomes.

Reviewers' conclusions

Implications for practice

The results of this systematic review confirm the commonly held view of today's clinicians that a policy of unrestricted, unmonitored oxygen therapy has potential harms, without clear benefits. However, the question of what is the optimal target range for maintaining blood oxygen levels in preterm/LBW infants was not answered by the data available for inclusion in this review.

Implications for research

As the question of what is the optimal target range for maintaining blood oxygen levels remains unclear, further research should be undertaken to resolve this important clinical question. An ongoing trial in Australia is attempting to address one aspect of this issue. The BOOST trial (BOOST (Australia)) is assessing the effect of higher oxygen levels from 32 weeks postmenstrual age on long term growth and development of extremely preterm infants. Results from this trial will be added to the meta-analysis as they become available. The STOP-ROP trial (STOP-ROP 2000) assessed the effect of higher oxygen levels on the progression of pre-threshold ROP. The results of this trial are included in a separate Cochrane review entitled: "Supplemental oxygen for the treatment of pre-threshold retinopathy of prematurity" (Lloyd J, ASkie LM, Smith J, Tarnow-Mordi WO). It should be noted, however, that neither of these trials addresses the effect of oxygen levels on outcomes in the early neonatal period.

Acknowledgements

None.

Potential conflict of interest

The authors of this review are currently conducting a randomized, controlled trial of the effect of higher versus standard oxygen saturation targeting on long term growth and development of preterm infants.

Characteristics of included studies

Study Methods Participants Interventions Outcomes Notes Allocation concealment
Kinsey 1956 Central telephone randomisation ensured adequate allocation concealment. The ratio of experimental group : control group was 2:1 in first 3 months of enrolment. Following that, 574 infants were consecutively allocated to the experimental group and had no concurrent controls. These infants are not included in this review. The number of infants excluded before randomization is not known. Randomization was stratified by birth weight categories and institution. The intervention was not blinded, and the blinding of outcome assessments is unclear. The followup rate for outcome measures was 97%. There were detailed power calculations. 212 infants with BW <1500g who survived to 48 hours. Enrolment commenced in July 1953. The mean BW in the two groups was 1242g (restricted) and 1234g (liberal) respectively. Infants were followed until 2.5 months of age. Experimental group (restricted O2): received oxygen only if clinical condition indicated and maximum FiO2 permitted was 0.5. 
Control group (liberal O2): received supplemental oxygen in excess of 50% for a minimum of 28 days, and were then weaned over 3 days.
Vascular RLF (any stage) in survivors
Vascular RLF (severe stages) in survivors
Cicatricial RLF (any grade) in survivors
Cicatricial RLF (severe grades) in survivors
Mortality (48 hours-40 days)

Of the 144 infants assigned to the restricted O2 group, 36 died before 40 days and 4 were lost to followup. There were 15 deaths and no losses to followup amongst the 68 infants allocated to the liberal O2 group. 

A
Lanman 1954 Infants were randomized by random numbers, method unspecified, and thus allocation concealment is unclear. There was no blinding of the intervention, and it is unknown if outcome assessments were done blinded to treatment allocation. There was only one loss to followup of the 86 infants enrolled. Power calculations were inadequate with the completion of the study being determine by a date specified one year in advance. 86 infants with BW 1000-1850g, admitted within 12 hours of birth. Infants were followed until 3 months age. Experimental group (restricted oxygen): only received oxygen when cyanosed, at a maximum FiO2 of 0.5. The mean FiO2 received by this group was 0.38.
Control group (liberal oxygen): received supplemental oxygen for a minimum of 2 weeks or until reaching 1500g, and were then weaned abruptly. The mean FiO2 received by this group was 0.69.
Vascular RLF (any stage) in survivors
Cicatricial RLF (any grade) in survivors
Mortality (12 hours-3 months)
B
Patz 1954 Quasi-random treatment allocation, based on alternate admission basis. Allocation concealment was thus inadequate. There was no blinding of the intervention and it is unclear whether outcome assessments were blinded to treatment allocation. Attrition due to deaths or losses to followup are not reported, so it is unclear whether there was complete outcome measure ascertainment. No power calculations were reported. An unknown number of very low birthweight infants (</= 1500g) were enrolled from Jan 1951 to May 1953. 120 infants survived and had eye outcome assessments completed by 6 months age and were included in the analysis. Experimental group (restricted oxygen): infants received oxygen only for clinical indications, and to a maximum FiO2 of 0.4. The range of duration of oxygen in this group was 1 day - 2 weeks. Once weaning was indicated, it proceeded over 1-3 days.
Control group (liberal oxygen): infants were placed in supplemental oxygen of 60-70% for 4-7 weeks, then weaned over one week.
Vascular RLF (any stage) in survivors
Cicatricial RLF (severe grades) in survivors
Cicatricial RLF (severe grades), BW <1000g, in survivors

There are no data available, either published or unpublished, on mortality rates. The number of infants allocated to each group was not reported, hence outcome data can only be expressed in relation to the surviving infants presenting for followup assessment.

C
Sinclair 1968 Randomized to one of 4 treatment groups, using sealed envelopes and thus allocation concealment was adequate. There was no blinding of treatment intervention, and it is unclear whether there was blinding of outcome assessments. No power calculations were reported. Short term follow up was complete. 20 infants with BW 1000-2500g, less than 24 hours age, who were hypoxic and acidemic were included. Infants were randomized to one of four treatment groups including combinations of the following treatments: restricted vs liberal ambient oxygen, rapid vs slow alkali infusion, assisted vs spontaneous ventilation. There was random allocation of the other two treatments within the two oxygen therapy groups, hence the data from this trial were included in the review.
Experimental group (restricted oxygen): supplemental oxygen, to a maximum of 35%, to keep PaO2 50-120 mmHg. If PaO2 fell below 40 mmHg or infant became bradycardic, could give unlimited oxygen and would be considered as a treatment failure.
Control group (liberal oxygen): received 100% headbox oxygen for first 2 hours, then aimed to maintain PaO2 at 50-120 mmHg using any FiO2 needed.
Mortality (any)
Physiological measures including:
- acid-base balance
- PaO2 levels
- percentage right-left shunt
- serum electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen, serum lactate
- urinary net acid excretion
- plasma bicarbonate
- "apparent" bicarbonate space
Long term neurological assessments reported as "in progress" in the paper were never completed (personal communication J. Sinclair, July 1998).
A
Usher 1973 Infants were randomized by a stratified random sampling technique. Allocation concealment is unclear. There was no blinding of the intervention. One author was unblinded to the treatment allocation, but is unclear whether this author was involved in outcome assessments. No power calculations were reported. Early outcome data were reported completely. However, long term outcome data included only 15% of the enrolled infants and thus have not been included in this review. 150 infants with a diagnosis of respiratory distress syndrome or BW <1000g were eligible for inclusion. The numbers excluded prior to randomization are not reported. Experimental group (low PaO2): infants received oxygen only if their PaO2 fell below 40 mmHg or PcapO2 fell below 35 mmHg. Sufficient oxygen was used to maintain these tensions. 
Control group (high PaO2): infants were kept in a minimum of 40% oxygen for 72 hours. Aim was to maintain PaO2 80-120 mmHg or PcapO2 50-60 mmHg.
Mechanical ventilation was not available to either group.
Mortality (any)
Mortality (respiratory)
Descriptive results of respiratory failure measures were reported (such as retractions, grunting, respiratory pattern and rate, chest Xray changes).
B

Characteristics of excluded studies

Study Reason for exclusion
Bard 1996 Infants were not randomly assigned to target two different arterial blood oxygen saturations (90% and 95%). Infants acted as their own controls. This was not a random or quasi-random trial and was thus excluded from the review.
Cunningham 1995 This nonrandomised, retrospective study assessed the effects of variability of oxygen levels, as measured by transcutaneous oxygen monitoring, on the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity. Patient allocation was not randomised, and thus the study was excluded from the review.
Engleson 1958 This nonrandomised trial addressed a different question from that under review. It examined the effects of keeping preterm infants at oxygen concentrations below that of room air, and was thus not included in the review.
Gaynon 1997 The study was a retrospective analysis of different target ranges of oxygen saturation on the incidence of ROP. There was no random allocation of patients to different treatment groups, thus the trial was excluded from the review.
Kitchen 1978 This study was a randomized trial of a "package" of intensive care, including intravenous glucose, umbilical arterial catheterisation, bicarbonate infusion, and high PaO2 levels, versus the standard neonatal care regimen of the late 1960s. The trial was excluded from the review because the entire "package" of interventions, rather than the separate elements within it, was the randomized intervention. Thus, other interventions that could affect clinical outcomes were unbalanced between oxygen exposure groups.
Lundstrom 1995 This randomised trial addressed a different question from that under review. It compared the use of atmospheric air versus 80% oxygen for preterm infants during initial stabilization in the delivery room, and was thus excluded from the review.
Mendicini 1971 This study was a randomised trial of a "package" of intensive care, including intravenous glucose, bicarbonate infusion, and high PaO2 levels, versus the standard neonatal care regimen of the late 1960s. The trial was excluded from the review because the entire "package" of interventions, rather than the separate elements within it, was the randomized intervention. Thus, other interventions that could affect clinical outcomes were unbalanced between oxygen exposure groups.
Schulze 1995 This was a nonrandomised, crossover trial comparing the effects of two different oxygen saturation target ranges on cardiac output, oxygen extraction, and oxygen consumption in mechanically ventilated, low birth weight infants. As treatment allocation was not random or quasi-random, the trial was excluded from the review.
STOP-ROP 2000 This trial included preterm/LBW infants with pre-threshold ROP. The intervention tested was supplemental oxygen for the treatment of pre-threshold ROP, not a preventative strategy. The results of this trial will be included in a separate Cochrane review entitled: "Supplemental oxygen in the treatment of pre-threshold retinopathy of prematurity" (Lloyd J, Askie LM, Smith J, Tarnow-Mordi WO). 
Weintraub 1956 The planned scheme of quasi-random, alternate allocation was not adhered to, resulting in the possibility of substantial selection bias, and the study was thus excluded from the review.

Characteristics of ongoing studies

Study Trial name or title Participants Interventions Outcomes Starting date Contact information Notes
BOOST (Australia) Benefits of oxygen saturation targeting trial Infants < 30 weeks pma, still O2 dependent at 32 weeks pma Higher (Fn SpO2 95-98%) vs standard (Fn SpO2 91-94%) O2 targeting Growth and development at one year corrected age, other secondary outcomes September 1996 lisa.askie@perinatal.usyd.edu.au Primary results expected by early 2002.

References to studies

References to included studies

Kinsey 1956 {published data only}

Kinsey VE. Cooperative study of retrolental fibroplasia and the use of oxygen. Arch Ophthalmol 1956;56:481-543.

Lanman 1954 {published data only}

Lanman JT, Guy LP, Dancis J. Retrolental fibroplasia and oxygen therapy. JAMA 1954;155:223-226.

Patz 1954 {published data only}

* Patz A. Oxygen studies in retrolental fibroplasia. IV. Clinical and experimental observations. Am J Ophthalmol 1954;38:291-308.

Patz A, Hoeck LE, Cruz E De La. Studies on the effect of high oxygen administration in retrolental fibroplasia. I. Nursery observations. Am J Ophthalmol 1952;36:1248-1253.

Patz A. The role of oxygen in retrolental fibroplasia. Pediatrics 1957;19:504-524.

Sinclair 1968 {published data only}

Sinclair JC, Engel K, Silverman WA. Early correction of hypoxemia and acidemia in infants of low birth weight. A controlled trial of oxygen breathing, rapid alkali infusion and assisted ventilation. Pediatrics 1968;42:565-589.

Usher 1973 {published data only}

* Usher RH. Treatment of respiratory distress syndrome. In: Winters RW, editor(s). The Body Fluids in Pediatrics. Boston & Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, 1974:303-337.

Coates AL, Desmond K, Willis D, Nogrady MB. Oxygen therapy and long-term pulmonary outcome of respiratory distress syndrome in newborns. Am J Dis Child 1982;136:892-895.

References to excluded studies

Bard 1996 {published data only}

Bard H, Belanger S, Fouron J. Comparisons of effects of 95% and 90% oxygen saturations in respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child 1996;75:F94-F96.

Cunningham 1995 {published data only}

Cunningham S, Fleck BW, Elton RA, McIntosh N. Transcutaneous oxygen levels in retinopathy of prematurity. Lancet 1995;346:1464-1465.

Engleson 1958 {published data only}

* Engleson, G, Rooth G, Sjostedt S. Treatment of premature infants with 15% oxygen. Acta Paediatr Scand 1958;(118 Suppl):47-49.

Sjostedt S, Rooth G. Low oxygen tension in the management of newborn infants. Arch Dis Child 1957;32:397-400.

Rooth G, EnglesonG, Tornblom M. A follow-up study of premature infants treated with low oxygen tension. Acta Paediatr Scand 1966;55:85-87.

Gaynon 1997 {published data only}

Gaynon, MW, Stevenson DK, Sunshine P, Fleisher BE, Landers MB. Supplemental oxygen may decrease progression of prethreshold disease to threshold retinopathy of prematurity. J Perinatol 1997;17:434-438.

Kitchen 1978 {published data only}

* Kitchen WH, Ryan MM, Rickards A, Gaudry E, Brenton AM, Billson FA, Fortune DW, Keir EH, Lundahl-Hegedus EE. A longitudinal study of very low birthweight infants. I. Study design and mortality rates. Dev Med Child Neurol 1978;20:605-618.

Kitchen WH, Rickards A, Ryan MM, McDougall AB, Billson FA, Keir EH, Naylor FD. A longitudinal study of very low-birthweight infants. II. Results of controlled trial of intensive care and incidence of handicaps. Dev Med Child Neurol 1979;21:582-589.

Kitchen WH, Campbell DG. Controlled trial of intensive care for very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1971;48:711-714.

Lundstrom 1995 {published data only}

* Lundstrom KE, Pryds O, Greisen G. Oxygen at birth and prolonged cerebral vasoconstriction in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child 1995;73:F81-F86.

Lundstrom KE, Pryds O, Greisen G. 80% oxygen administration to newborn premature infants causes prolonged cerebral vasoconstriction [abstract]. Pediatr Res 1994;35:275.

Lundstrom KE, Larsen PB, Brendstrup L, Skov L, Greisen G. Cerebral blood flow and left ventricular output in spontaneously breathing, newborn preterm infants treated with caffeine or aminophylline. Acta Paediatrica 1995;84:6-9.

Mendicini 1971 {published data only}

Mendicini M, Scalamandre A, Savignoni PG, Picece-Bucci S, Esuperanzi R, Bucci G. A controlled trial on therapy for newborns weighing 750-1250g. I. Clinical findings and mortality in the newborn period. Acta Paediatr Scand 1971;60:407-416.

Schulze 1995 {published data only}

Schulze A, Whyte RK, Way RC, Sinclair JC. Effect of the arterial oxygenation level on cardiac output, oxygen extraction, and oxygen consumption in low birth weight infants receiving mechanical ventilation. J Pediatr 1995;126:777-784.

STOP-ROP 2000 {published data only}

The STOP-ROP Multicenter Study Group. Supplemental theraputic oxygen for prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity (STOP-ROP), a randomized, controlled trial. I: Primary outcomes. Pediatrics 2000;105:295-310.

Weintraub 1956 {published data only}

Weintraub DH, Tabankin A. Relationship of retrolental fibroplasia to oxygen concentration. J Pediatr 1956;49:75-79.

References to ongoing studies

BOOST (Australia) {unpublished data sought but not used}

Askie LM, Henderson-Smart DJ, Irwig L, Simpson J. NSW Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research Building D02 University of Sydney. NSW. 2006. AUSTRALIA Telephone: +61 2 9351 7739 Fax: +61 2 9351 7742 Email: laskie@mail.usyd.edu.

* indicates the primary reference for the study

Other references

Additional references

Avery 1960

Avery ME, Oppenheimer EH. Recent increase in mortality from hyaline membrane disease. J Pediatr 1960;57:553.

Bancalari 1987a

Bancalari E, Flynn J, Goldberg RN, Bawol R, Cassady J, Schiffman J, Feuer W, Roberts J, Gillings D, Sim E. Influence of transcutaneous oxygen monitoring on the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics 1987;79:663-669.

Bancalari 1987b

Bancalari E, Flynn J, Goldberg RN, Bawol R, Cassady J, Schiffman J, Feuer W, Roberts J, Gillings D, Sim E. Transcutaneous oxygen monitoring and retinopathy of prematurity. Adv Exper Med Biol 1987;220:109-113.

Chan-Ling 1995

Chan-Ling T, Gock B, Stone J. Supplemental oxygen therapy. Basis for noninvasive treatment of retinopathy of prematurity. Investig Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1995;36:1215-1230.

Cote 1988

Cote CJ, Goldstein EA, Cote MA, Hoaglin DC, Ryan JF. A single-blind study of pulse oximetry in children. Anesthesiology 1988;68:184-188.

Cross 1973

Cross KW. Cost of preventing retrolental fibroplasia? Lancet 1973;2:954-956.

Duc 1992

Duc G, Sinclair JC. Oxygen Administration. In: Sinclair JC, Bracken MB, editor(s). Effective Care of the Newborn Infant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992:178-98.

Flynn 1987

Flynn J, Bancalari E, Bawol R, Goldberg R, Cassady MA, Schiffman J, Feuer W, Roberts J, Gillings D, Sim E, Buckley E, Bachynski BN. Retinopathy of prematurity. A randomized prospective trial of transcutaneous oxygen monitoring. Ophthalmology 1987;94:630-637.

Gunn 1980

Gunn TR, Easdown J, Outerbridge EW, Aranda JV. Risk factors in retrolental fibroplasia. Pediatrics 1980;65:1096-1100.

Kinsey 1977

Kinsey VE, Arnold HJ, Kalina RE, Stern L, Stahlman M, Odell G, Driscoll JM, Elliott JH, Payne J, Patz A. PaO2 levels and retrolental fibroplasia: a report of the cooperative study. Pediatrics 1977;60:655-668.

McDonald 1963

McDonald AD. Cerebral palsy in children of low birth weight. Arch Dis Child 1963;38:579.

McIntosh 2001

McIntosh N, Marlow N. High or low oxygen saturation for the preterm baby. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Edition 2001;84:F149-F150.

Phelps 1984

Phelps DL, Rosenbaum AL. Effects of marginal hypoxemia on recovery from oxygen-induced retinopathy in the kitten model. Pediatrics 1984;73:1-6.

Poets 1998

Poets CF. When do infants need additional inspired oxygen? A review of the current literature. Pediatr Pulmonol 1998;26:424-428.

Reese 1953

Reese AB, King M, Owens WC. A classification of retrolental fibroplasia. Am J Ophthalmol 1953;36:1333-1335.

ROP Committee 1984

Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. An international classification of retinopathy of prematurity. Br J Ophthalmol 1984;68:690-697.

ROP Committee 1987

Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. An international classification of retinopathy of prematurity. II The classification of retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:906-912.

Tin 2001

Tin W, Milligan DWA, Pennefather P, Hey E. Pulse oximetry, severe retinopathy, and outcome at one year in babies of less than 28 weeks gestation. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal Neonatal Edition 2001;84:F106-F110.

Other published versions of this review

Askie 2001

Askie LM, Henderson-Smart DJ. Restricted versus liberal oxygen exposure for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm or low birth weight infants (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 1999. Oxford: Update Software.

Comparisons and data

01 Restricted versus liberal oxygen therapy (all preterm/LBW infants)
01.01 Vascular RLF (any stage) in survivors
01.02 Vascular RLF (severe stages) in survivors
01.03 Cicatricial RLF (any grade) in survivors
01.04 Cicatricial RLF (severe grades) in survivors
01.05 Death (any)
01.06 Death or vascular RLF (any stage)
01.07 Death or cicatricial RLF (any grade)

02 Restricted versus liberal oxygen therapy (BW<1000g)
02.01 Cicatricial RLF (severe grades) in survivors

03 Restricted versus liberal oxygen therapy (all preterm/LBW infants) excluding Patz 1954
03.01 Vascular RLF (any stage) in survivors
03.02 Cicatricial RLF (severe grades) in survivors

04 Low versus high PaO2 (all preterm/LBW infants)
04.01 Death (any)

05 Low versus high PaO2 (BW <1250g)
05.01 Death (any)
 

Notes

Published notes

Amended sections

None selected

Contact details for co-reviewers

David J Henderson-Smart
Director
NSW Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research
Queen Elizabeth II Institute for Mothers and Infants
Building DO2
University of Sydney
Sydney
NSW AUSTRALIA
2006
Telephone 1: +61 2 93517318
Telephone 2: +61 2 93517728
Facsimile: +61 2 93517742
E-mail: dhs@perinatal.usyd.edu.au