Tracheal suctioning without disconnection in intubated ventilated neonates

Woodgate PG, Flenady V

Cover Sheet - Background - Methods - Results - Characteristics of Included Studies - References - Data Tables & Graphs


Cover sheet

Title

Tracheal suctioning without disconnection in intubated ventilated neonates

Reviewers

Woodgate PG, Flenady V

Dates

Date edited: 21/02/2001
Date of last substantive update: 05/02/2001
Date of last minor update: / /
Date next stage expected / /
Protocol first published: Issue 1, 1997
Review first published: Issue 2, 2001

Contact reviewer

Dr Paul G Woodgate, MB BS FRACP MMedSc
Consultant Neonatologist
Department of Neonatology
Mater Mother's Hospital
Raymond Terrace
South Brisbane
Brisbane
Queensland AUSTRALIA
4101
Telephone 1: +61 7 3840 1911
Facsimile: +61 7 3840 1949
E-mail: PWOODGAT@mater.org.au
Secondary contact person's name: Mark W Davies

Contribution of reviewers

Intramural sources of support

Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Mater Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, AUSTRALIA
Mater Mothers Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, AUSTRALIA

Extramural sources of support

None

What's new

Dates

Date review re-formatted: / /
Date new studies sought but none found: / /
Date new studies found but not yet included/excluded: / /
Date new studies found and included/excluded: / /
Date reviewers' conclusions section amended: / /
Date comment/criticism added: / /
Date response to comment/criticisms added: / /

Text of review

Synopsis

Synopsis pending.

Abstract

Background

Assisted mechanical ventilation is the mainstay of management of a variety of conditions affecting the neonate. However there are a number of potential hazards associated with this life saving intervention. New suctioning techniques have been introduced into clinical practice which aim to prevent or reduce these untoward effects.

Objectives

To assess the effects of endotracheal suctioning without disconnection in intubated ventilated neonates.

Search strategy

The review has drawn on the search strategy for the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases was undertaken by the reviewers.

Selection criteria

All trials utilizing random or quasi-random patient allocation in which suctioning with or without disconnection from the ventilator is compared in the neonatal population.

Data collection & analysis

Standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Group were used. Each author reviewed trials for eligibility and quality and extracted data separately, then compared and resolved differences. Analysis was performed using the fixed effects model and outcomes were reported using relative risk for categorical data and weighted mean difference for outcomes measured on a continuous scale.

Main results

Two trials (22 infants) were included in this review. The trials employed a cross-over design in which suctioning with or without disconnection was compared. Suctioning without disconnection resulted in a reduction in episodes of hypoxia (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11, 0.80) and a smaller percentage decrease in the TcPO2 (WMD 18.5%, 95% CI 8.11, 28.89). There were also fewer infants who experienced episodes where TcPO2 decreased by > 10% (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17, 0.79). Suctioning without disconnection resulted in a smaller percentage decrease in heart rate (WMD 11.53%, 95% CI 3.64, 19.43) and a reduction in the number of infants experiencing a decrease in heart rate by > 10% (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32, 0.99).

Reviewers' conclusions

Based upon the results of this review, there is insufficient evidence to decide between endotracheal suctioning with or without disconnection. There is, however, evidence of some benefit from performing suctioning without disconnection for some specific short-term outcomes. Further research should be undertaken to fully assess this practice with particular focus on extremely low birth weight infants and different modes of mechanical ventilation, and to address clinically important outcomes.

Background

Assisted mechanical ventilation is the mainstay of management of a variety of conditions affecting the neonate. However there are a number of potential hazards associated with this life saving intervention. The presence of an endotracheal tube causes soft tissue irritation and increased secretions, thus increasing the likelihood of tube blockage and lobar collapse. Endotracheal suctioning aims to reduce the problems resulting from build-up of secretions and tube obstruction such as discomfort, hypoxaemia, hypercapnoea and lobar collapse. Protocols for endotracheal care vary widely between institutions and are not, in general, based on sound evidence (Turner 1983, Tolles 1990).

Endotracheal tube suctioning is associated with a number of complications in newborn infants which have been well documented including hypoxaemia (Simbruner 1981, Danford 1983), bradycardia (Simbruner 1981, Cabal 1979), atelectasis (Fox 1978), mucosal trauma and pneumothorax (Anderson 1976, Vaughan 1978, Alpin 1984). Other reported potentially adverse effects include raised blood pressure (Perlmann 1983, Shah 1992), changes in cerebral blood volume (Perlmann 1983, Shah 1992, Skov 1992, Bucher 1993)and cerebral haemoglobin deoxygenation (Shah 1992, Skov 1992).

Endotracheal suctioning without disconnection from ventilator with the use of specially designed endotracheal tube adaptors may reduce the risk of complications by minimising the interference with ventilation during the procedure.

Objectives

To assess the effects of endotracheal suctioning without disconnection in ventilated neonates.

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

All trials utilizing random or quasi-random patient allocation in which suctioning with and without disconnection from the ventilator is compared.

Types of participants

All infants receiving ventilatory support in the newborn period via an endotracheal tube who underwent regular endotracheal suctioning.

Types of interventions

Any methods used to enable endotracheal suctioning without disconnection from the ventilator, compared to suctioning with disconnection.

Types of outcome measures

Bradycardia
Hypoxaemia
Hypertension
Hypotension
Dislodgment of the endotracheal tube
Intraventricular haemorrhage
Pneumothorax

A priori sub-group analyses:

Gestational age (< 29 wks)
Acute vs chronic respiratory failure
With or without preoxygenation
With or without increased mechanical ventilation

Search strategy for identification of studies

The review has drawn on the search strategy for the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. See: Cochrane Neonatal Group, Search strategy for specialised register in: Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 1999. A comprehensive search was also undertaken by the reviewers including MEDLINE (1966-2000), Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2000) and CINAHL databases (1982-2000) (search terms included infant-newborn, suction*, endotracheal, ETT, adaptor, adapter, closed, controlled clinical trial, randomised controlled trial) and cross referencing.

Methods of the review

Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group were used. The methodological quality of each trial was reviewed by both authors independently. A referee (Australasian Regional Co-coordinator for the Neonatal Review Group) was sought for unresolved differences.

Each author extracted data separately, then compared and resolved differences. Standard methods of Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used to synthesise the data including the use of relative risk and weighted mean difference for data measured on a continuous scale.

Additional information was requested from the authors of trials (Spence 1992, Tan 1992, Mosca 1997) to clarify methodology and seek further data regarding outcomes. Additional information was obtained for two of these studies (Spence 1992, Mosca 1997).

Description of studies

Using the above search strategy, seven studies were identified.

Two of these studies were included in this review (Gunderson 1986, Mosca 1997). Participants in the included studies were similar. The birth weight (BW) range was 760-2700g. The gestational age (GA) range was 25-36 weeks. All infants were receiving mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress, and receiving routine endotracheal suctioning. The studies used similar techniques and methodology. A suction procedure employing a special adapter which permitted endotracheal suction without disconnection from the ventilator was used. Preoxygenation was not performed in either study. Cross-over design was employed in both included studies. In each study, each infant underwent three paired suctioning procedures. The data used in this review were averages of the three measurements for each condition, with or without disconnection.

The effects of the suctioning methods on heart rate and oxygenation status were recorded. However, due to differences in measurement or lack of data, most outcomes reported in this review relate to the findings of individual trials. Only two outcomes were able to be assessed using the combined data from both studies. These were percentage change in heart rate and heart rate decrease greater than 10%. Bradycardia (heart rate < 100 bpm) was reported in both included studies, although only the data from Mosca 1997 were able to be included in this review. Episodes of hypoxia were reported by Gunderson 1986 (TcPO2 < 50 mm Hg) and Mosca 1997 (SaO2 <90%). Gunderson 1986 also reported change in heart rate and TcPO2. Mosca 1997 also reported cerebral blood volume and intracellular cerebral oxygenation using Near-infrared spectroscopy.

(For further details of included studies as well as outcomes assessed see "Table of Included Studies")

A further five studies were identified but excluded. Four of these were excluded as neither random nor quasi-random allocation to suction method was used (Graff 1987, Cabal 1979, Zmora 1980, Spence 1992). These studies used a cross-over design with alternation of suction method but did not randomly or quasi-randomly allocate the initial treatment method. Tan 1992 was excluded due to insufficient data. This study was published in abstract form and further data have been requested.

Details of the studies not included in the review are provided for the purposes of discussion.

Cabal 1979 excluded (not randomised)
Eight preterm appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) requiring mechanical ventilation and oxygenation were studied during episodes of routine endotracheal suctioning. Participants were preterm infants with a gestational age 33 (±3) weeks and birthweight 1555g (± 584) grams [(Mean (SD)]. Two suction procedures were alternatively performed in each infant at approximately 4-hour intervals. In Procedure A, disconnection of the ventilator and preoxygenation by manual intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) for 15-seconds, followed by Procedure B where the infant was suctioned with a Novametrix C/D Suction Adaptor without ventilatory disruption or preoxygenation. Both procedures involved pre suction chest vibration and instillation of normal saline into the endotracheal tube. One hundred and twenty eight suctioning events were measured with each procedure and changes in heart rate (HR) and arterial oxygenation saturation (SaO2) during suctioning were compared. This study reported beneficial effects in terms of HR and SaO2 measures associated with the use of a closed method of suction compared to an open technique with preoxygenation.

Graff 1987 - excluded (not randomised)
Twenty infants requiring ventilatory assistance were studied during two suction procedures. Participants were preterm infants with a birthweight 1647(±1105) grams and gestational age 31 (±3) weeks, and age at study was 6 days (±6.1) days [(Mean (SD)]. Two suction procedures were performed in each infant, while nursed in the supine position. The first procedure involved preoxygenation with an increase in FiO2 of 0.2, followed by ventilation with an Ambu bag, and suction. At conclusion of the suctioning the FiO2 was decreased to the previous setting. The second procedure (study group) involved the use of a device called a Neo-Cath which allows the alternate delivery of 4 L/min of 100% oxygen and suction during the suction procedure. Both procedures involved the instillation of normal saline into the endotracheal tube prior to suctioning. Transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP), were recorded 5 minutes before the study (baseline measure), at 30 seconds, then every 1 minute until the infant returned to the baseline. The study reported beneficial effects on oxygenation status with the use of a closed method of suction without preoxygenation compared with preoxygenation used with an open suction technique. No difference was shown between the groups in heart rate and blood pressure measures.

Zmora 1980 - excluded (not randomised)
Thirteen infants (BW 900 to 4400 g, GA 27 to 40 wk) requiring mechanical ventilation for RDS, pneumonia, perinatal asphyxia and gastro-intestinal surgery were studied. Nineteen paired studies were performed. Each study involved routine endotracheal suctioning with disconnection, followed by suctioning via a side-hole adaptor without disconnection at the next scheduled pulmonary toilet, usually one to two hours later. Continuous transcutaneous oxygen, heart rate and airway pressure monitoring was performed.
Results: In all but two studies, the percent decrease in TcPO2 was less when suction was performed without disconnection. The magnitude of these differences was significantly less in 12 of 19 studies on all occasions (p=<0.01). Bradycardia was less in 6 infants, no different in 11, and worse in one infant with suction without disconnection. Mean airway pressure remained higher when using the side-hole adaptor. The greater the decrease in mean airway pressure, the more severe was the decline in TcPO2.

Tan 1992 - excluded (insufficient data)
Fifty-six intubated infants were randomised to tracheal suction with or without disconnection from mechanical ventilation. The abstract reported a reduction of desaturation and duration of desaturation associated with tracheal suctioning without disconnection.

Spence 1992 - excluded (not randomised)
Twenty low birthweight infants( BW 944-2500 g, GA 27-37 weeks) receiving mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress were studied using a cross-over design comparing suction with and without disconnection (Novametrix). Preoxygenation (increase in Fio2 by 0.05) was performed as part of the standard procedure in both groups. Each infant underwent three paired episodes of ETT suction. Heart rate, TcPo2 and blood pressure were recorded over the suctioning procedure. The study reported no difference between the groups in measures of oxygenation, heart rate and blood pressure.

Methodological quality of included studies

One trial (Gunderson 1986) is of good quality as blinding of allocation at randomisation was undertaken using a non-replaceable sealed card system and outcome assessment was made blinded to the intervention. The other trial (Mosca 1997) employed a quasi-random method of treatment allocation, i.e. the order of allocation to the first treatment exposure was alternated (personal communication from author).

There were no post-randomisation exclusions of infants in the included trials. In Gunderson 1986, one study (out of three planned studies for each infant) for one neonate was dropped from analysis as during this period the FiO2 dropped to below 0.3 (thus meeting exclusion criterion). However, data from the other two study periods of this neonate were included in the analysis. Outcomes were available for all infants enrolled in Mosca 1997.

Results

There were a total of 22 infants included in this review.

Heart rate effects
Heart rate decrease >10%. Two trials assessed this outcome. Neither trial found evidence of effect. However, the meta-analysis finds that fewer infants experienced heart rate decreases >10% when suctioning was performed without disconnection (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32, 0.99).

Percentage change in heart rate. Two trials assessed this outcome. Mosca 1997 found a smaller percentage decrease in heart rate when suctioning was performed without disconnection, whereas Gunderson 1986 found no evidence of effect. The meta-analysis supports a smaller percentage decrease in heart rate with suctioning without disconnection (WMD 11.53%, 95% CI 3.64, 19.43).

Bradycardia (HR <100 bpm). One trial reported this outcome (Mosca 1997). No evidence of effect was found (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03, 1.90).

Oxygen effects
Percentage change in TcP02. One trial assessed this outcome (Gunderson 1986). There was a smaller percentage decrease in TcP02 when suctioning was performed without disconnection (mean difference 18.50%, 95% CI 8.11, 28.89). The percentage decrease in TcP02 when suctioning was performed without disconnection was only 2.9%, versus 21.4% with disconnection.

Hypoxia (Sa02 <90%). One trial assessed this outcome (Mosca 1997). Fewer infants experienced episodes of hypoxia when suctioning was performed without disconnection (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11, 0.80).

TcP02 decrease >10%. One trial assessed this outcome (Gunderson 1986). When suctioning was performed without disconnection, there was a statistically significant reduction in the proportion of infants in whom TcP02 decreased by >10% (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17, 0.79).

Due to insufficient data no other prespecified outcomes were able to be assessed. Sub-group analyses by gestational age, acute vs chronic respiratory failure, with or without preoxygenation and with or without increased mechanical ventilation could not be conducted. Further data have been requested.

Discussion

A total of 22 infants were enrolled into the two included trials. Due to differences in reporting of outcomes, the majority of outcomes in this review represent individual results of the two small included trials. Both trials used a cross-over design, which enables assessment of immediate effects of the intervention only.

The results of this review suggest that endotracheal suctioning without disconnection using an endotracheal adaptor is beneficial in terms of reducing some immediate adverse effects. This technique produced less disturbance to the cardiorespiratory status as measured by decrease in oxygenation and heart rate. However, this review was unable to asses the clinical significance of the observed benefits.

There was insufficient data available to assess other clinically important outcomes which were identified a priori. For example, none of the identified studies reported outcomes such as endotracheal tube dislodgment, infection, or major morbidities such as intraventricular haemorrhage and pneumothorax. Long term outcomes cannot be assessed due to the cross-over methodology of the studies. A priori subgroup analyses (gestational age, acute vs chronic respiratory failure, with or without preoxygenation) to detect differential effects were also unable to be performed.

The infants included in these studies were similar to the current population of patients in neonatal intensive care units, although the majority of the patients studied were above 1000 grams birth weight. However, all the patients were receiving conventional mechanical ventilation. As there are now newer techniques available such as patient-triggered and high frequency ventilation, it would be inappropriate to extrapolate these findings to patients other than those receiving conventional mechanical ventilation.

Although the number of infants studied in this review is small, the benefits of suction without disconnection on immediate complications of suctioning is consistent with other reports with similar findings. These include the identified studies which were not included in this review (Cabal 1979, Zmora 1980, Tan 1992, Graff 1987, Spence 1992).

The role of preoxygenation with endotracheal suctioning is the primary objective of another Cochrane Neonatal Review in preparation.
 

Reviewers' conclusions

Implications for practice

There is insufficient evidence to decide between endotracheal suctioning with or without disconnection. There are, however, short term benefits in performing suctioning without disconnection in neonates receiving conventional mechanical ventilation. The long term clinical benefits of these findings are not assessed by the included studies. It would seem wise for clinicians to continue with existing suctioning techniques where proficiency has been gained.

Implications for research

In view of the lack of evidence to support current suctioning practices, research should address the safety and efficacy of endotracheal suctioning in mechanically ventilated neonates. Future trials should determine the role of tracheal suctioning without disconnection with different modes of mechanical ventilation other than conventional ventilation, and in patients with gestational age below 29 weeks. Clinically important outcomes such as infection, pulmonary morbidities and neurodevelopmental status should be assessed as well as cost-effectiveness of the techniques.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Dr Fabio Mosca and Kaye Spence for providing additional information on their trials, and also David Henderson-Smart for assistance with this review.

Potential conflict of interest

None
 

Characteristics of included studies

Study Methods Participants Interventions Outcomes Notes Allocation concealment
Gunderson 1986 Blinding of randomisation: yes
Blinding of intervention: no
Complete follow-up:yes
Blind outcome assessment:yes
Crossover design, random allocation.
11 newborns with RDS. GA range 29-33weeks , Birth weight range 840-2125 gm. Age at time of study 24 - 75 hours. Negative blood cultures. Fio2 > 0.3 and receiving mechanical ventilation (including CPAP), ETT > 3.0mm (internal diameter). Experimental group: Endotracheal tube suction using end hole endotracheal tube adaptor(Isothermal 3165). Control group received ETT suction using disconnection from ventilator. Single operator technique. Studied at beginning and end of three separate 2 hour study periods. Heart rate: number of occasions >10% decrease, percent change, episodes of bradycardia (<100bpm).
TcPO2: episodes of >10% decrease, decrease to <50mmHg and percent change.
Preoxygenation not performed. A
Mosca 1997 Blinding of allocation: No (quasi-random)
Blinding of intervention: no
Complete follow-up: yes
Blinded outcome assessment: can't tell
Quasi-randomised crossover design.
11 preterm infants receiving mechanical ventilation for RDS or BPD. Median GA 29 weeks (range 25-36), median BW 1170 gm (range 760-2700 gm). Experimental group: Suction without disconnection using an adapter (Trach care, Ballard).
Control group: ETT suction group with disconnection from the ventilator. Each infant underwent one suction by each method 60 minutes apart. This was repeated three times on the same day at intervals of several hours alternating the order in which the suction method was performed. 
Mean arterial blood pressure, cerebral blood volume, intracellular cerebral oxygenation, heart rate change, bradycardia (HR<100bpm), PCO2, arterial oxygen saturation Preoxygenation not performed. Individual patient data provided by Dr. Mosca. C
Abbreviations.
RDS - respiratory distress syndrome
GA - gestational age
CPAP - continuous positive airway pressure
FiO2 - fraction of inspired oxygen
ETT - endotracheal tube
BPD - bronchopulmonary dysplasia
NICU - neonatal intensive care unit
TcPO2 - transcutaneous arterial partial pressure (tension) of oxygen.
SaO2 - arterial oxygenation saturation

Characteristics of excluded studies

Study Reason for exclusion
Cabal 1979 Unable to verify random or quasi-random allocation.
Graff 1987 Unable to verify random or quasi-random allocation.
Spence 1992 Random or quasi-random allocation not used.
Tan 1992 Insufficient data (abstract only)
Zmora 1980 Unable to verify random or quasi-random allocation.

References to studies

References to included studies

Gunderson 1986 {published data only}

Gunderson LP, McPhee AJ, Donovan EF. Partially ventilated endotracheal suction: use in newborns with respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Dis Child 1986;140:462-5.

Mosca 1997 {published data only}

Mosca F, Colnaghi M, Lattanzio M, Bray M, Pugliese S, Fumagalli M. Closed versus open endotracheal suctioning in preterm infants: effects on cerebral oxygenation and blood volume. Biol Neonate 1997;72:9-14.

References to excluded studies

Cabal 1979 {published data only}

Cabal L, Devaskar S, Siassi B et al. New endotracheal tube adaptor reducing cardiopulmonary effects of suctioning. Crit Care Med 1979;7:552-555.

Graff 1987 {published data only}

Grafff M, France J, Hiatt M, Hegyi T. Prevention of hypoxia and hyperoxia during endotracheal suctioning. Crit Care Med 1987;15:1133-1135.

Spence 1992 {published data only}

Spence K, Johnston L. Evaluation of endotracheal suction using a side-hole adaptor in mechanically ventilated low birth weight infants. Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Unpublished paper 1992.

Tan 1992 {published data only}

Tan L, Torres B, Kanarek K, Blair C. Randomized comparison of closed tracheal suction with open tracheal suction: Effect on oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, TcPCO2, TcPO2, and motor response. Pediatr Res 1992;31:225A.

Zmora 1980 {published data only}

Zmora E, Merritt A. Use of side-hole endotracheal tube adapter for tracheal aspiration. Am J Dis Child 1980;134:250-254.

* indicates the primary reference for the study

Other references

Additional references

Alpin 1984

Alpin G, Glik B, Peleg O, Amit Y, Eyel F. Pneumothorax due to endotracheal tube suction. Am J Perinatol 1984;1:345-348.

Anderson 1976

Anderson KD, Chandra R. Pneumothorax secondary to perforation of sequential bronchi by suction catheters. J Pediatr Surg 1976;11:687-693.

Bucher 1993

Bucher HU, Blum-Gisler M, Duc G. Changes in cerebral blood volume during endotracheal suctioning. J Pediatr 1993;122:324.

Carlo 1979

Carlo W. Assisted Ventilation. In: Klaus MH and Fanaroff AA, editors. Care of the High-Risk Neonate. 4th ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia; 1979:Klaus MH and Fanaroff AA, editors. Care of the High-Risk Neonate. 4th ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia; 1979; 205-223.

Danford 1983

Danford DA, Miske S, Headley J, et al. Effects of routine care procedures on transcutaneous oxygen in neonates: a quantitative approach. Arch Dis Child 1983;58:20-23.

Fox 1978

Fox WW, Schwartz JG, Shaffer TH. Pulmonary physiotherapy in neonates: physiologic changes and respiratory management. J Pediatr 1978; 92:physiologic changes and respiratory management. J Pediatr 1978; 92; 977-981.

Perlmann 1983

Perlmann JM, Volpe JJ. Suctioning in the preterm infant: effects on cerebral blood flow velocity, intracranial pressure and arterial blood pressure. Pediatrics 1983;72:329-334.

Shah 1992

Shah AR, Kurth CD, Gwiazdowski SG, Chance B, Delivoria-Papadopolus M. Fluctuations in cerebral oxygenation and blood volume during endotracheal suctioning in premature infants. J Pediatr 1992;120:769-774.

Simbruner 1981

Simbruner G, Coradello H, Fodor M, Lubec G, Pollak A. Effect of tracheal suction on oxygenation, circulation and lung mechanics in newborn infants. Arch Dis Child 1981;56:506-510.

Skov 1992

Skov L, Ryding I, Pryds O, Greisen G. Changes in cerebral oxygenation and cerebral blood volume during endotracheal suctioning in ventilated neonates. Acta Pediatr 1992;81:389-393.

Tolles 1990

Tolles CL, Stone KS. National survey of neonatal endotracheal suctioning practices. Neonatal Network 1989;9:7-14.

Turner 1983

Turner B. Endotracheal suction in premature infants. J Calif Perinatal Assoc 1983;3:104.

Vaughan 1978

Vaughan RS, Menke JA, Giacoia GP. Pneumothorax: A complication of endotracheal suctioning. J Pediatr 1978;92:633-634.

Comparisons and data

01 Suctioning without disconnection vs with disconnection.
01.01 Heart rate decrease >10%
01.02 Change in heart rate (%)
01.03 Bradycardia (HR < 100 bpm)
01.04 Change in TcPO2 (%)
01.05 Hypoxia (SaO2 < 90%)
01.06 TcPO2 decrease>10%

Notes

Published notes

Amended sections

None selected

Contact details for co-reviewers

Vicki J Flenady
Research Coordinator
Perinatal Epidemiology Unit
Mater Hospital
Raymond Terrace
South Brisbane
Queensland AUSTRALIA
4101
Telephone 1: 61 7 38401587
Telephone 2: 61 7 38401585
Facsimile: 61 7 38401588
E-mail: vflenady@mater.org.au
Secondary contact person's name: Paul Woodgate