Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures in newborns with intraventricular hemorrhage

Whitelaw A

Cover Sheet - Background - Methods - Results - Discussion - Characteristics of Included Studies - References - Tables & Graphs


Cover sheet

Title

Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures in newborns with intraventricular hemorrhage

Reviewers

Whitelaw A

Dates

Date edited: 23/11/2000
Date of last substantive update: 02/11/2000
Date of last minor update: 28/10/1999
Date next stage expected / /
Protocol first published:
Review first published: Issue 4, 1997

Contact reviewer

Professor Andrew Whitelaw, MD
Professor of Neonatal Medicine
Division of Child Health
University of Bristol
Division of Child Health, University of Bristol Medical School
Southmead Hospital
Bristol
UK
BS9 1PJ
Telephone 1: +44 117 959 5699
Telephone 2: + 117 959 5325
Facsimile: +44 117 959 5324
E-mail: andrew.whitelaw@bristol.ac.uk

Contribution of reviewers

Intramural sources of support

University of Bristol, UK

Extramural sources of support

None

What's new

This review updates the review "Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures in newborns with intraventricular hemorrhage" which was published in The Cochrane Library, Disk Issue 3, 1998. Searching has not revealed any new randomized trials. There is no evidence that this intervention improves outcome.

Dates

Date review re-formatted: / /
Date new studies sought but none found: 02/11/2000
Date new studies found but not yet included/excluded: / /
Date new studies found and included/excluded: / /
Date reviewers' conclusions section amended: / /
Date comment/criticism added: / /
Date response to comment/criticisms added: / /

Text of review

Synopsis

Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a major complication of premature birth and a cause of cerebral palsy and hydrocephalus. Repeated early lumbar puncture or ventricular taps have been advocated as a way of avoiding hydrocephalus and protecting the brain from pressure. It was thought that the risk of hydrocephalus and the need for a ventriculoperitoneal shunt might be reduced by the removal of protein and old blood in the cerebrospinal fluid. This hypothesis has been tested in four randomized trials involving premature infants in whom IVH (with or without established enlargement) was diagnosed by ultrasound. There is no evidence that early tapping of cerebrospinal fluid by lumbar puncture or ventricular tap reduces the risk of shunt dependence, disability, multiple disability or death. The use of repeated taps was associated with an increased risk of central nervous system infection. Thus the early use of early tapping cannot be recommended. Removing cerebrospinal fluid should be reserved for cases where there is symptomatic raised intracranial pressure.

Abstract

Background

Although it has been possible to reduce the percentage of premature infants suffering intraventricular hemorrhage, posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus remains a serious problem without a good treatment. There is a high rate of cerebral palsy, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery makes the child permanently dependent on the valve and catheter system. Shunt surgery cannot be carried out early because of the blood in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the brain may be subjected to periods of raised pressure. Early tapping of CSF by lumbar puncture or ventricular tap was suggested as a way of temporarily reducing pressure and removing blood and protein and thereby avoiding permanent hydrocephalus.

Objectives

To determine whether repeated CSF tapping, by lumbar puncture or ventricular tap, reduced the risk of permanent shunt dependence, neurodevelopmental disability or death in neonates at risk of, or actually developing, post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH). This form of treatment was based on the hypothesis that repeated tapping removed protein and blood from the CSF, thus clearing obstruction from the channels of CSF absorption.

Search strategy

Pediatric, Neurosurgical and General Medical Journals were handsearched from 1976 up to October 2000, as well as the Medline database (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Personal contacts were used.

Selection criteria

Four controlled trials ( with five published papers) were identified, three being randomized and the fourth using alternative allocation. Two trials evaluated repeated lumbar punctures in neonates with intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and two trials evaluated repeated CSF tapping infants with IVH followed by progressive ventricular dilatation.

Data collection & analysis

In addition to details of the patient selection and patient allocation, the interventions were extracted. The end-points examined were: ventriculoperitoneal shunt, death, disability, multiple disability and death or disability.

Main results

The studies were sufficiently similar in the question they were asking and the interventions were sufficiently in common that they could be combined when assessing the effect of the intervention. When repeated CSF tapping was compared to conservative treatment, the relative risks for shunt placement, death, disability and multiple disability were very close to 1.0 with no statistically significant effect. There is also evidence that this form of treatment increased the risk of CSF infection.

Reviewers' conclusions

Early repeated CSF tapping cannot be recommended for neonates at risk of, or actually developing, post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus.

Background

Although many interventions have been shown to reduce the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), it is still a common consequence of premature birth. Posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) is the most serious complication of IVH. The risk of PHH is related to the size of the original hemorrhage and the initial mechanism is thought to be blockage of the channels of CSF reabsorption by multiple small blood clots (Hill 1984). Permanent hydrocephalus is thought to result from inward migration of fibroblasts and collagen deposition in the CSF pathways. Early insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt is fraught with complications and delayed shunt operations in small prematures have a high rate of blockage and infection ( Punt 1995). Furthermore these infants are nearly always shunt-dependent for the rest of their lives and require several later operations even if no other problems occur. Thus it would be a great advantage if treatment could reduce the risk of permanent hydrocephalus after established IVH. Neurodevelopmental outcome is poor in infants with PHH. Although part of this is because of parenchymal brain lesions present before PHH developed, it is likely that some of the dysfunction is the result of prolonged periods with raised intracranial pressure with periventricular edema and distortion of the developing axonal pathways and their myelination.

It has been postulated that early removal of bloody CSF by lumbar or ventricular tap might improve the prognosis of infants at risk of, or actually developing, PHH. The infants might benefit in terms of better neurological function because of reduced pressure and less periventricular edema. The physical removal of CSF containing blood and protein might allow the blocked pathways to be re-opened and re-establish normal CSF drainage. Removal of blood and protein might also prevent any inflammatory and fibrotic reaction and reduce the need for a permanent shunt.

Objectives

The objectives of this review are to examine the evidence that treatment of IVH or early PHH by repeated lumbar punctures or ventricular punctures a) reduces the need for a permanent shunt or b) improves neurodevelopmental outcome.

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

All controlled trials whether truly randomized or quasi-randomised in which repeated CSF tapping was compared to standard (control) treatment in newborn infants with IVH or early PHH were to be identified. Treatment by tapping cannot be done 'blind' by the neonatologist but the assessment of outcome could be carried out by individuals blind to early treatment allocation.

Types of participants

Infants of less than three months of age with a) IVH demonstrated by ultrasound or CT scan ( at risk of PHH) or b) infants with IVH followed by progressive ventricular dilatation were included. Infants with other causes of hydrocephalus (eg infection, congenital aqueduct stenosis, tumour) were excluded.

Types of interventions

Repeated lumbar puncture, repeated ventricular puncture or repeated tapping from a subcutaneous ventricular reservoir.

Types of outcome measures

The main outcomes of interest are the number of children a) acquiring permanent shunts b) dying during follow-up c) surviving with major disability at 12 months or more in survivors d) surviving with multiple neurodevelopmental impairments e) surviving without disability.

Search strategy for identification of studies

The reviewer has been an active trialist in this area and has personal contact with many groups in this field. Journals handsearched from January 1976 (when CT scanning of neonates started) to October 2000 include: Pediatrics, J Pediatrics, Archives of Disease in Childhood, Pediatric Research, Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica, European J of Pediatrics, Neuropediatrics, Neurosurgery, J Neurosurgery, Pediatric Neurosurgery, Biology of the Neonate, New England J Medicine, Lancet, British Medical Journal. The Medline database (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Database of Controlled Trials were searched from January 1976 until October 2000 using the MeSH terms intraventricular hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, lumbar puncture, newborn infant. Proceedings of the Society for Pediatric Research, European Society for Pediatric Research, Neonatal Society and British Paediatric Association were searched by hand from 1988 to October 2000.

Methods of the review

Each identified trial was assessed for methodological quality with respect to a) adequate allocation concealment b) method of allocation c) performance bias d) exclusion bias e) bias in outcome assessment. Trials without a simultaneous control group ( eg those with historical controls) were rejected.
Inclusion criteria and therapeutic interventions for each trial were reviewed to see how they differed between trials. The outcomes in each trial were examined to see how comparable they were between studies.
Statistics: 2 X 2 tables were made from each trial for each important outcome and odds ratio, relative risk and risk difference with 95% confidence intervals were used in the meta-analysis.

Description of studies

See separate table Characteristics of Included Studies.

Heterogeneity
An important issue is heterogeneity of the populations and/or intervention between trials. Two trials (Mantovani 1980 and Anwar 1985) enrolled infants with IVH and examined the effect of repeated lumbar puncture in preventing the development of permanent hydrocephalus (as defined by ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement).Two trials (Dykes 1989 and Ventriculomegaly 1990) enrolled neonates with IVH who then went on to show progressive ventricular dilatation. They examined the effect of lumbar punctures (Dykes 1989) or lumbar punctures or ventricular tapping (Ventriculomegaly 1990). The first approach is non-selective and allows earlier intervention (which might, in theory, offer a better chance of success).  The second approach is selective but still means that some babies are treated who would have resolved without shunting anyway. The second approach usually means later treatment because one has to wait and see which IVH infants will show progressive dilatation. A further point is that the Ventriculomegaly trial used ventricular as well as lumbar tapping to achieve CSF drainage whereas the other three trials used only lumbar puncture. Larger volumes of CSF could be taken each time by ventricular tap than by lumbar puncture but the potential for trauma and infection in the brain is probably greater by the ventricular route. All four trials tackled the same question: does repeated tapping of CSF reduce the risk of hydrocephalus? All four trials attempted in their interventions to drain as much CSF as was practical. For these reasons, we have examined them together.

Determination of outcomes:
1. Death during the period of follow-up was one outcome not liable to bias
2. Insertion of a shunt was another major outcome. The indications for shunt insertion varied somewhat in the wording used but they all required a progressive increase in ventricular size despite a period of tapping. This is a definition which is not likely to be biased although timing of shunting could have been biased by knowledge of treatment allocation.
3. Neurodevelopmental outcome

Dykes 1989 had developmental outcome assessed at different ages by pediatric neurologists and a psychologist. The paper does not state whether they were blinded to early treatment allocation. The children were classified into 'major handicap' and "no major handicap". Those who had major handicap were further subdivided into those with a) 'single system disability' and b) those with 'multiple handicaps'. We extracted the numbers of children a) without major disability b) with a single disability c) with multiple disability.

In Ventriculomegaly 1990 virtually all the children were examined by one developmental pediatrician who was blind to early treatment allocation. Children were examined at 12 months post-term and at 30 months post-term. We extracted the numbers of children with single system disability and those with multiple impairments.

Impairments, disabilities and handicaps
The term 'handicap' may, in retrospect, have been used in rather an imprecise way and it has been avoided in the analyses. Disability was taken to mean a disturbance of function severe enough to prevent the child functioning at an age appropriate level. Single system disability meant that the findings were confined to one system of the nervous system eg a) hemiplegia without mental retardation or b) sensorineural hearing loss.

The terms 'multiple handicap', 'multiple disability' or 'multiple impairments' were taken to mean clinically significant disturbances of function in different domains of the nervous system eg the combination of mental retardation, spastic diplegia, cortical blindness and epilepsy. When the figures for death or disability were calculated, the numbers of infants randomized but lost to follow-up were subtracted from the totals originally entered. Death or disability were mutually exclusive and thus could be aggregated.

Methodological quality of included studies

Searching yielded only four trials which qualified.
Assessment of validity of studies:

MANTOVANI 1980
Method of randomization - alternation
Blinding of caretakers - no
Almost all subjects analyzed - yes
Blinding of observer - can't tell

ANWAR 1985
Method of randomization - random number table
Blinding of caretakers - no
Almost all subjects analyzed - yes
Blinding of observer - can't tell

DYKES 1989
Method of randomization - random number table
Blinding of caretakers - no
Almost all subjects analyzed - yes
Blinding of observer - can't tell

VENTRICULOMEGALY 1990
Method of randomization - telephone
Blinding of caretakers - no
Almost all subjects analyzed - yes
Blinding of observer - yes

Results

The total number of infants in the four studies is only 282, with 157 coming from the Ventriculomegaly Trial. The tables and figures show that none of the trials found a significant effect of CSF tapping on a) need for shunt b) death c) major disability in survivors d) multiple disability in survivors e) death or disability. Similarly, meta-analysis of the results of all included trials shows no significant effect of CSF tapping on any of these outcomes.

Side effects of interventions:
Repeated CSF tapping of preterm infants carries a theoretical risk of introducing infection. None of the infants in Dykes 1989 study developed CSF infection during tapping but 11 of the 157 infants in the Ventriculomegaly Trial developed CSF infections, all having had some CSF taps (the infants in the control group were eventually tapped if they developed symptoms or signs of raised intracranial pressure). CSF infection (meningitis/ventriculitis) is a serious adverse effect of early repeated CSF tapping. There is no information about the frequency of needle-track lesions from repeated ventricular taps.

Discussion

Although it was a reasonable hypothesis that early CSF tapping would reduce pressure and remove protein and blood, thus clearing the CSF pathways, meta-analysis of four controlled trials has failed to demonstrate any evidence of benefit. Indeed there is a risk of secondary infection in addition to the discomfort of the procedures. Assessment of the infants in the Ventriculomegaly trial at 12 months included a sub-group analysis into a) infants who had a cerebral parenchymal lesion visible on ultrasound at entry and b) infants with no cerebral parenchymal lesion at entry. In the group with parenchymal brain lesions at entry, there was a difference in neurodevelopmental outcome in favour of those who had early CSF tapping (Ventriculomegaly 1990). This difference had a p value of 0.05 and caution was expressed in the paper as to whether this finding could be due to chance. The neurodevelopmental examination at 30 months in the infants with parenchymal brain lesions at entry showed no difference between the two treatment groups. This illustrates the importance of basing clinical recommendations on consistent findings among large groups of subjects.

Reviewers' conclusions

Implications for practice

On the basis of available evidence, routine use of early CSF tapping for infants at risk of, or actually developing, post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus cannot be recommended.
It would seem wise to be conservative in the management of infants developing PHVD to reduce the risk of iatrogenic damage. The infant should be carefully scanned to determine the presence or absence of parenchymal brain lesions as they affect prognosis. The infant should be followed with repeated measurements of head circumference and ventricular width as well as clinical examination of neurological status and fontanelle tension. Despite the lack of evidence from randomized trials, it would be hard to argue against CSF drainage if there is evidence of symptomatic raised intracranial pressure as shown by:
a) deterioration in neurological signs with a tense fontanelle
b) Decreasing diastolic velocities on cerebral artery Doppler waveforms
c) Deteriorating sensory evoked potentials
d) Directly measured CSF pressure over 12 mm Hg

Many infants need few, if any, CSF taps but continue to expand their ventricles and heads at a rate which is clearly above normal. If this excessive expansion continues over 6 weeks observation, shunt surgery should be considered. The surgeon may wish to postpone surgery if the infant is still extremely small, if there is infection or if the CSF still has visible blood or high protein. If it has been necessary to tap the CSF repeatedly because of symptoms, then the case for earlier shunt surgery is stronger because repeated CSF taps, particularly ventricular taps, create morbidity.

Implications for research

As ventriculoperitoneal shunting is still a treatment with many problems in preterm infants with PHH, alternative therapies are very much needed. Drug treatment to reduce the production of CSF (acetazolamide and furosemide) is currently being reviewed for the Cochrane Library (Whitelaw 2000).

Another therapeutic approach beginning to be evaluated is intraventricular fibrinolytic therapy, the object being to lyse fibrin and so open up the CSF reabsorption pathways. There is now a separate Cochrane review on intraventricular streptokinase after intraventricular hemorrhage. The available evidence suggests that fibrinolytic intervention relatively late (2 - 4 weeks after the IVH) is ineffective and current research is directed at understanding the early processes which initiate the process of fibrosis around the ventricular system (Whitelaw 1997; Whitelaw 1999).

Acknowledgements

Potential conflict of interest

None
 

Characteristics of included studies

Study Methods Participants Interventions Outcomes Notes Allocation concealment
Anwar 1985 Open randomized clinical trial Preterm infants with grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage on ultrasound scan Daily lumbar puncture starting at 7 - 10 days. CSF was drained until flow stopped. Lumbar punctures were continued until the ventricular size decreased, remained unchanged for 2 consecutive weeks or if the infant developed hydrocephalus requiring a ventricular drain or shunt. Hydrocephalus was defined as a progressive increase in ventricular size as measured by ultrasound, in association with either signs of increased ICP or an increase in head circumference >2 cm/week for at least 2 weeks.
Death before discharge from hospital.
Death.
A random number table was used. B
Dykes 1989 Open randomized clinical trial using random number tables Neonates with asymptomatic severe posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus Daily lumbar punctures, taking enough CSF to lower the CSF pressure by half. Volumes ranged from 2 - 21 ml. Duration 1 - 3 weeks. Hydrocephalus management failure was defined as increasing head circumference, progressive decrease in cortical mantle ( eg occipital cortical mantle < 1 cm), signs of raised ICP. 
Death during follow-up.
Assessment at 3 - 6 years into no major handicap, single system disability and multiple disability.
It is not stated whether the paediatric neurologists and the psychologist were blind to early treatment allocation. B
Mantovani 1980 Open clinical trial with alternation of treatment Infants weighing less than 2000g with grade 2 or 3 intraventricular hemorrhage on CT scan Daily lumbar punctures starting 24 hours after diagnosis of IVH. 3 - 5 ml of CSF was removed daily. Lumbar punctures were continued until the CSF was clear and protein concentration was < 180 mg/dl. Hydrocephalus was defined as 2 CT scans with progressively enlarging ventricles. 
Death before discharge from hospital.
Not true randomization. It is not stated if the observers of outcome were blind to early treatment allocation. C
Ventriculomegaly 90 Open randomized multicentre clinical trial at 15 neonatal intensive care units in England, Ireland and Switzerland. Randomization by telephoning and registering the infant before hearing the allocation. Neonates with intraventricular haemorrhage, with progressive increase in ventricular size and whose ventricular width had increased to 4 mm over the 97th centile. Repeated lumbar puncture taking as much CSF as possible, maximum 2 % body weight carried out daily or less frequently to prevent further increases in ventricular size. If not more than 2 ml of CSF could be obtained, ventricular tapping was carried out in the same way and often enough to hold the ventricular width constant. Permament shunting was carried out if there was failure to control head size despite medical management or if repeated tapping was necessary for more than 4 weeks.
Death during follow up.
Neurodevelopmental assessment was carried out at 12 months post term.
Neurodevelopmental status examined at 30 months by a developmental pediatrician. Death during follow-up.
The developmental pediatrician assessing the survivors at 12 and 30 months was blind to early treatment allocation. A

Characteristics of excluded studies

Study Reason for exclusion
Kreusser 1985 Not a controlled trial
Lipscomb 1983 Not a controlled trial
Papile 1980 Not a controlled trial

References to studies

References to included studies

Anwar 1985 {published data only}

Anwar M, Kadam S, Hiatt IM, Hegyi T. Serial lumbar punctures in prevention of post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus in preterm infants. J Pediatr 1985;107:446-450.

Dykes 1989 {published data only}

Dykes FD, Dunbar B, Lazarra A, Ahmann PA. Posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in high risk infants: Natural history, management and long-term outcome. J Pediatr 1989;114:611-8.

Mantovani 1980 {published data only}

Mantovani JF, Pasternak JF, Mathew OP, Allen WC, Mills MT, Casper J, Volpe JJ. Failure of daily lumbar punctures to prevent the development of hydrocephalus following intraventricular hemorrhage. J Pediatr 1980;97:278-281.

Ventriculomegaly 90 {published data only}

* Ventriculomegaly Trial Group. Randomized trial of early tapping in neonatal posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation. Arch Dis Child 1990;65:3-10.

Ventriculomegaly Trial Group. Randomized trial of early tapping in neonatal posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation: results at 30 months. Arch Dis Child 1994;70:129-36.

References to excluded studies

Kreusser 1985 {published data only}

Kreusser KL, Tarby TJ, Kovnar E, Taylor DA, Hill A, Volpe JJ. Serial lumbar punctures for at least temporary amelioration of neonatal posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Pediatrics 1985;75:719-24.

Lipscomb 1983 {published data only}

Lipscomb A, Thorburn R, Stewart A, Reynolds E, Hope P. Early treatment for rapidly progressive posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Lancet 1983;i:1438-9.

Papile 1980 {published data only}

Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H, Koops BL, Johnson JD. Post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus in low-birthweight infants: treatment by serial lumbar punctures. J Pediatr 1980;97:273-7.

* indicates the primary reference for the study

Other references

Additional references

Hill 1984

Hill A, Shackleford GD, Volpe JJ. A potential mechanism of pathogenesis for early posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in the premature newborn. Pediatrics 1984;73:19-21.

Hudgins 1994

Hudgins RJ, Boydston WR, Hudgins PA, Adler SR. Treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage in the premature infant with urokinase. A preliminary study. Pediatr Neurosurg 1994;20:190-7.

Levene 1981

Levene MI. Measurement of the growth of the lateral ventricle in preterm infants with real time ultrasound. Arch Dis Child. 1981;56:900-4.

Punt 1995

Punt J. Neurosurgical management of hydrocephalus. In: Levene MI, Lilford RJ, editor(s). Fetal and neonatal neurology and neurosurgery. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone:661-6.

Whitelaw 1992

Whitelaw A, Rivers R, Creighton L, Gaffney P. Low dose intraventricular fibrinolytic therapy to prevent posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Arch Dis Child 1992;67:F12-4.

Whitelaw 1996

Whitelaw A, Saliba E, Fellman V, Mowinckel M-C, Acolet D, Marlow N. Phase 1 study of intraventricular recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for treatment of posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Arch Dis Child. 1996;74:F20-26.

Whitelaw 1997

Whitelaw A. Intraventricular streptokinase after intraventricular hemorrhage in newborn infants (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 1997. Oxford: Update Software.

Whitelaw 1999

Whitelaw A, Christie S, Pople I. Transforming Growth Factor beta-1: a possible signal molecule for posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Pediatr Res 1999;46:576-580.

Whitelaw 2000

Whitelaw A, Kennedy CR, Brion LP. Diuretics for newborn infants with posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation (Cochrane Protocol). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.

Other published versions of this review

Whitelaw 1998

Whitelaw A. Repeated lumbar or ventricular punctures in newborns with intraventricular hemorrhage (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 1998. Oxford: Update Software.

Comparisons and data

01 Lumbar punctures or ventricular punctures vs control

01.01 Hydrocephalus shunt
01.02 Death
01.03 Major disability in survivors
01.04 Multiple disability in survivors
01.05 Death or disability

Notes

Unpublished CRG notes

Short title (no longer in use): CSF tapping after IVH

Published notes

Amended sections

Synopsis
Abstract
Search strategy
Discussion
Reviewers' conclusions
Other references
Characteristics of ongoing studies