PROPOSAL NO. 2005-04/R
DATE: May 27, 2005
REVISED:
NAME: Hierarchical Geographic Names in the MARC 21 Bibliographic
Format
SOURCE: ALA MAGERT Cataloging and Classification Committee
SUMMARY: This paper proposes expanding the definition of
Field 752 (Added Entry - Hierarchical Place Name), adding new subfields to
752 and the newly defined 662 and making some current subfields repeatable
to enable a hierarchical approach to subject-oriented geographic coverage.
KEYWORDS: Field 662 (BD); Subject Added Entry -
Hierarchical Place Name (BD); Field 752 (BD); Added Entry -
Hierarchical Place Name (BD); Hierarchical Place Name (BD)
RELATED: 2004-DP02
(January 2004); 2004-07
(June 2004); 2005-04 (Jan.
2005)
STATUS/COMMENTS: 05/27/05 - Made available to the MARC
21 community for discussion.
06/25/05 - Results of the MARC Advisory Committee discussion - Approved
as amended. Participants agreed to add subfields $e and $4 for relator term/code
to field 662 and 752. The following subfield code changes will be made: 1)
change city subsection to subfield $f; 2) change other geographic regions and
features
to subfield $g; 3) change extraterrestrial
areas to subfield $h. The use of subfields in terms of 1) extraterrestrial
bodies; 2) nonjurisdictional entities; 3) order of subfields must be clarified.
10/12/05 - Results of LC/LAC/BL review - Approved
Proposal 2005-04/R: Hierarchical Geographic Names in the MARC 21 Bibliographic Format
1. BACKGROUND
In current MARC 21 documentation, Field 752 (Added Entry -
Hierarchical Place Name) is used "to give access to a
bibliographic record by way of a hierarchical form of a place name
related to a particular attribute (e.g., for newspapers, the name of
the community served; for rare books, the place of publication or
printing)." Some applications, such as online catalogs of
graphic images, have used the hierarchical geographic name structure
of field 752 to provide subject access.
Some users expressed a need to distinguish between a hierarchical approach
providing place of manufacture/publication information for an item
described in a bibliographic record and a hierarchical approach that
provides subject-oriented geographic coverage.
Discussion
Paper 2004-DP02 (Applying Field 752 (Added Entry -
Hierarchical Place Name) for Different Purposes in the MARC 21
Bibliographic Format) was presented to the MARC Advisory Committee for
review and discussion in
January 2004. It described the variety of current usages of field 752
and the need of some institutions to differentiate between place of
manufacture/publication information and subject-oriented geographic
information. The discussion paper suggested either adding an
indicator to field 752 to show whether the place name provided
manufacture/publication information or subject information, or
defining a new field in the subject range for subject-oriented
access. No consensus was reached; a straw
poll showed participants rather evenly split between the two options.
The group decided that a formal proposal presenting
both options should be written.
The MARC Advisory Committee reviewed and discussed
Proposal
2004-07 (Applying Field 752 (Added Entry - Hierarchical Place
Name) for Different Purposes in the MARC 21 Bibliographic Format)
in June 2004. The paper presented two alternative methods to
facilitate distinguishing between place of manufacture/publication
information and subject-oriented geographic information: 1) adding
indicators to the 752 field to show whether the name designated
the place of manufacture/publication or provided subject access; and
2) defining a new field (field 652) for subject access. The proposal
also suggested adding subfield $2 to field 752 to cite thesauri used
as sources for field content, possibly expanding some subfields'
definitions, and changing their repeatability as a means of extending
geographic hierarchies.
The second option of defining a new field was approved in part.
Participants agreed that field 662 (rather than field 652, which had
been defined earlier but made obsolete) was an appropriate field for
encoding hierarchical forms of geographic names that provided subject
coverage. Participants also decided that the portion of Proposal
2004-07 concerning the definition of a subfield $2 and the expansion of subfields'
definitions and changes to their repeatability in both the 662 and 752 fields
should be covered in a
new proposal.
In January 2005,
Proposal 2005-04 (Hierarchical Geographic Names in the MARC 21
Bibliographic Format) was presented for review and discussion.
After some deliberation participants agreed to:
- Consider the usage of different vocabularies/thesauri and how methods for
coding the field.
- Keep the the two fields parallel in terms of structure. Rare book and newspaper
users do not think the proposed changes would affect their usage
- Expand the definition of existing subfields. Make some subfields
repeatable and demonstrate repeatable subfield usage.
- Define the subfields more clearly, particularly subfield $a,
and provide more guidance on how to code newly-added subfields.
- Add subfield $2 to record the source of terms used.
2. DISCUSSION
2.1. Current definition of Field 752.
Current indicators and subfields in Field 752 are:
- Field 752 (Added Entry - Hierarchical Place Name)
- First indicator
- Second indicator
- Subfield codes
- $a Country (NR)
- $b State, province, territory (NR)
- $c County, region, islands area (NR)
- $d City (NR)
- $6 Linkage (NR)
- $8 Field link and sequence number (R)
2.2. Limitations of Field 752 and desirability of defining additional subfields and/or expanding current subfields.
As noted in Proposal No. 2004-07, field 752's structure is
limited in terms of providing geographic coverage because it does not permit
the inclusion of many types of geographic entities. This is
due at least in part to the field's original purpose, as it was originally
defined to provide
access to bibliographic records for newspapers through a hierarchical form of a geographic place name. The
definition was later expanded to facilitate a more generalized
application of the field.
The subfields in field 752 do not specifically allow
for
coverage of terrestrial areas larger than countries, for named
sections of cities, extraterrestrial bodies or
many types of non-jurisdictional geographic entities.
2.3. Usage of multiple vocabularies/thesauri.
There are a number
of hierarchical geographic vocabularies/thesauri that
some users might use, depending on the type/level of
information desired in the record. Some examples of other
vocabularies/thesauri include: the
Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names (TGN);
the
Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) from the United States Geological
Survey; the
Canadian Geographical Names Data Base (CGNDB)/
La Base de données toponymiques du Canada (BDTC);
and the
Peakbagger.com Mountain Range Classification System (PEMRACS).
The entries listed below, extracted from the vocabularies/thesauri
cited above, demonstrate the range of hierarchical structure and
level of specificity present in these lists.
- Examples of entries for Asahi-dake mountain in Japan
- Entry from Peakbagger.com for Asahi-dake, a mountain in Japan:
- Name: Asahi-dake
- Country: Japan
- State/Province: Hokkaido
- Entry from the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names for Asahi-dake:
- World (facet)
- Asia (continent)
- Japan (nation)
- Hokkaido (region)
- Hokkaido (prefecture)
- Hokkaido (island)
- Asahi-Dake (mountain)
- Examples of entries for the Chiricahua mountain range in the United States
- Entry for the Chiricahua mountain range area from Peakbagger.com:
- The World
- Continent: North America
- Range 2: Intermountain West
- Range 3: Southwest Basins and Ranges
- Range 4: Southeast Arizona Ranges
- Range 5: Chiricahua Area
- Entry from the USGS Geographic Names Information System for the same approximate geographic area:
- Feature name: Chiricahua Mountains
- Feature type: range
- State: Arizona
- County: Cochise
- Entry for the Chiricahua Mountains from the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names:
- World (facet)
- North and Central America (continent)
- United States (nation)
- Arizona (state)
- Cochise (county)
- Chiricahua Mountains (mountains)
- Examples of entries for Little Tokyo area of Los Angeles
- Entry from the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names:
- World (facet)
- North and Central America (continent)
- United States (nation)
- California (state)
- Los Angeles (county)
- Los Angeles (inhabited place)
- Little Tokyo (neighborhood)
- Entry for the same area from the USGS Geographic Names Information System:
- Feature name: Little Tokyo (subdivision)
- Feature type: populated place
- State: California
- County: Los Angeles
- Examples of entries for the city of Silver Spring, Maryland in the
United States
- Examples of entries for Silver Spring, Maryland, from the USGS Geographic Names Information System:
- Feature name: Silver Spring
- Feature type: populated place
- State: Maryland
- County: Montgomery
- Entry for Silver Spring from the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names:
- World (facet)
- North and Central America (continent)
- United States (nation)
- Maryland (state)
- Montgomery (county)
- Silver Spring (inhabited place)
- Examples of entries for Windsor, Ontario in Canada
- Entry from the Canadian Geographical Names Data Base (CGNDB) for the city of Windsor, Ontario:
- Name: Windsor
- Province/Territory: Ontario
- Feature type: City
- Location: Essex
- Entry for Windsor from the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names:
- World (facet)
- North and Central America (continent)
- Canada (nation)
- Ontario (province)
- Windsor (inhabited place)
2.4. Revisions to 752/662 usage
- 1. Allow for the use of multiple vocabularies/thesauri.
Subfield $2 could be added to indicate the source of terms
used and source codes then registered.
- 2. Make subfields, both pre-existing ones in field 752 and additional
ones that will be added, repeatable to allow, when appropriate,
coding of more than one level within a hierarchy.
- 3. Revise and expand the definitions of subfields $a, $b,
and $c (see section 4 for new definitions).
- 4. Add additional subfields for City subsection ($e),
Other geographic regions or features ($f), and
Extraterrestrial area ($g).
3. EXAMPLES
Examples from Section 2.3.
- 662 ## $aJapan $cHokkaido $fAsahi-dake. $2pemracs <thesaurus code>
- 662 ## $aWorld $aAsia $bJapan $fHokkaido (Island)
$fHokkaido (Region) $cHokkaido (Prefecture) $fAsahi-Dake. $2tgn
- 662 ## $aWorld $aNorth America $fIntermountain West
$fSouthwest Basins and Ranges $fSoutheast Arizona Ranges
$fChiricahua Area. $2pemracs <thesaurus code>
- 662 ## $fChiricahua Mountains $bArizona $cCochise. $2gnis <thesaurus code>
- 662 ## $aWorld $aNorth and Central America $aUnited States
$bArizona $cCochise $fChiricahua Mountains. $2tgn<thesaurus code>
- 662 ## $aWorld $aNorth and Central America $aUnited States $bCalifornia
$cLos Angeles $dLos Angeles $eLittle Tokyo. $2tgn<thesaurus
code>
- 662 ## $bCalifornia $dLos Angeles $eLittle Tokyo. $2gnis <thesaurus
code>
- 662 ## $bMaryland $cMontgomery $dSilver Spring. $2gnis <thesaurus
code>
- 662 ## $aWorld $aNorth and Central America $aUnited States $bMaryland
$cMontgomery $dSilver Spring. $2tgn<thesaurus code>
- 662 ## $bOntario $cEssex $dWindsor. $2cgnbd <thesaurus code>
- 662 ## $aWorld $aNorth and Central America $aCanada $cOntario
$dWindsor. $2tgn<thesaurus code>
Other examples.
- 662 ## $aAntarctica. $2lcsh/naf
- 662 ## $aUnited States $bCalifornia $cLos Angeles (County) $dLos
Angeles $eLittle Tokyo. $2tgn
- 662 ## $aJapan (nation) $fKanto (region) $cTokyo (metropolis) $dTokyo (inhabited
place) $eShibuya. $2tgn
- 662 ## $gMars $gValles Marineris. $2Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature <thesaurus>
- 662 ## $aCanada $bBritish Columbia $dVancouver. $2lcsh/naf
- 662 ## $aNorth America $aUnited States $bNew York (State) $dNew York. $2tgn
- 662 ## $aWorld $aNorth and Central America $aUnited States $fGrand Canyon.
$2tgn
- 662 ## $aWorld $aNorth and Central America $aUnited States $bArizona $fGrand
Canyon. $2tgn
- 662 ## $aFrance $fFranche Comté. $2tgn
- 662 ## $aNorth and Central America $fNiagara Falls. $2tgn
- 662 ## $aUnited States$bNew York (State)$fNiagara Falls. $2lcsh/naf
- 662 ## $aCanada $bOntario (Province) $fNiagara Falls. $2lcsh/naf
- 662 ## $aAfrica $fNile River $fSixth Cataract. $2tgn
- 662 ## $aUnited States $bArizona $cChiricahua National Monument Wilderness. $2usgs
4. PROPOSED CHANGES
- 4.1 In the MARC21 Bibliographic format add subfields $e
(City subsection), $f (Other geographic regions or features),
$g (Extraterrestrial area) and $2 (Source) to field 752.
- 4.2 Make subfields as shown below.
- 4.3 Make Field 752 (Added Entry - Hierarchical Place Name) (R)
indicators and subfields the same as for Field 662.
- Field 662 (Subject Added Entry - Hierarchical Place Name) (R)
- Field definition and scope. This field contains a hierarchical form of a geographic name
used as a subject added entry. Subject added entries are assigned to a bibliographic
record to provide access to a bibliographic record through a hierarchical form
of a place name.
- First indicator
- Second indicator
- Subfield codes
- $a Country or larger entity (R)
- Subfield $a contains the
name of a country or a larger political jurisdiction.
Also contains the names of geographical areas/entities
such as continents or hemispheres at a country level
or higher. This subfield is repeated for hierarchies
when multiple levels are given, retaining the order highest-to-lowest.
- $b First-order political jurisdiction (NR)
- Subfield
$b contains the name of a first-order political jurisdiction
or division and, depending on the country, can include the names of
states, provinces, territories, départements, etc.
- $c Intermediate political jurisdiction (R)
- Subfield $c
contains the name of a second-order or lower political
jurisdiction or division but not including towns
or cities, and, depending on the country, can include
the names of counties,
islands, municipalities, prefectures, regions, etc.
This subfield
is repeated for
hierarchies when multiple levels are given, retaining
the order highest-to-lowest.
- $d City (NR)
- Subfield $d contains the name of a city or town.
- $e City subsection (R)
- Subfield $e contains the name of a smaller unit within a populated
place, e.g., neighborhoods, parks and streets.
- $f Other geographic regions or features (R)
- Subfield $f contains the
name of a terrestrial non-jurisdictional geographic
entity, e.g., rivers, lakes, islands, mountains, etc. This subfield
is repeated for hierarchies when multiple levels are given,
retaining the order highest-to-lowest.
- $g Extraterrestrial area (R)
- Subfield $g contains the
name of any extraterrestrial entity or space and includes
solar systems, galaxies, star systems, and planets as well as geographic
features of
individual planets, etc. This subfield is repeated for
hierarchies when multiple levels are given, retaining the order highest-to-lowest.
- $2 Source of term (NR)
- $6 Linkage (NR)
- $8 Field link and sequence number (R)
Additional comments.
- 1. Subfields do not have to be in strict alphabetical order.
They may be in any order appropriate for the hierarchy.
- 2. Both fields end with a mark of punctuation unless the last word in the
field is an abbreviation, initial/letter, or other data that ends with a
mark of punctuation. No punctuation is recorded between subfields.
Go to:
Library of Congress
Library of Congress Help Desk
(
10/03/2008
)