EVA3S: Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis - Full Text View

Sponsored by:	Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Information provided by:	Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT00190398

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether carotid angioplasty with stent (CAS) is as safe and effective as carotid surgery in regards to:

the risk of stroke and death within 30 days of the procedure;
the long-term risk of ipsilateral carotid territory stroke, in patients with recently symptomatic, severe carotid stenosis suitable for both CAS and carotid endarterectomy.

Condition	Intervention	Phase
Transient Ischemic Attack Carotid Stenosis Atherosclerosis	Device: Carotid angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection	Phase III

MedlinePlus related topics: Angioplasty Transient Ischemic Attack

U.S. FDA Resources

Study Type:	Interventional
Study Design:	Prevention, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Official Title:	Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Further study details as provided by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris:

Primary Outcome Measures:

Any stroke or death within 30 days of the procedure
Any stroke or death within 30 days of the procedure plus ipsilateral stroke during the follow-up period (2 to 4 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures:

Clinical: Myocardial infarction within 30 days of the procedure
Other complications within 30 days of the procedure: cerebral (transient ischemic attack [TIA])
locoregional (e.g. cranial nerve palsy, complications at the site of puncture)
General: Any disabling stroke or death within 30 days of the procedure plus disabling or fatal ipsilateral stroke during the follow-up period
Any stroke or death within 30 days of the procedure plus any stroke (or any stroke or death) during the follow-up period
TIA during the follow-up period
Functional status at the end of the study
Anatomical: Carotid restenosis (> 70% on carotid ultrasound)
Integrity of the stent 2 years after the procedure (on cervical radiogram)

Estimated Enrollment:	900
Study Start Date:	November 2000
Estimated Study Completion Date:	December 2007

Detailed Description:

Findings from two large randomized clinical trials – NASCET and ECST - have established endarterectomy as the standard treatment for severe symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Compared to endarterectomy, stenting with or without cerebral protection has the advantage of avoiding general anesthesia and incision in the neck that could lead to nerve injury and wound complications. The costs may be less than those of surgery, mainly because of a shorter hospital stay. However, stenting also carries a risk of stroke and local complications. Unlike endarterectomy, which has known long-term benefits, stenting does not remove the atheromatous plaque, and the long-term efficacy of this technique needs also to be assessed. Several trials are in progress in Europe and the United States.

We established this trial to evaluate whether stenting is not inferior to endarterectomy concerning (a) the risk of stroke or death within 30 days of procedure and (b) the long-term risk of ipsilateral stroke, in patients with recently symptomatic, severe carotid stenosis.

Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:	18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:	Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:	No

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

In brief, patients are eligible if they have experienced a carotid TIA or non disabling stroke within 4 months before randomisation and if they have an atherosclerotic stenosis of the region of the ipsilateral carotid bifurcation of 60% or more, as determined by the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) method, that investigators believe is suitable for both carotid endarterectomy and endovascular treatment. The degree of stenosis warranting treatment initially set at 70% or more was subsequently set at 60% or greater to reflect current generally accepted practice in the treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis. The presence of a 60% or more ipsilateral carotid stenosis has to be confirmed by conventional digital subtraction angiography or the combination of carotid Duplex scanning and magnetic resonance angiography, provided the results of these non-invasive techniques are concordant.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients cannot be included if they have a disabling stroke (mRS >=3), a non atherosclerotic carotid disease, a severe intracranial carotid artery stenosis, contra-indications to heparin, ticlopidine or clopidogrel.
There is no age limit.
The presence of contralateral occlusion and/or the angiographic appearance of the stenotic lesion are not factors in treatment selection. The randomisation algorithm takes centre and degree of stenosis (more or less than 90% stenosis) into account. Patients must be treated as soon as possible after random assignment, in any case within 2 weeks of randomisation.

Contacts and Locations

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00190398

Locations

France, Ile De France
Sainte-Anne Hospital: Department of Neurology
PARIS, Ile De France, France, 75674 cedex14

Sponsors and Collaborators

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Investigators

Principal Investigator:

Jean-Louis MAS, Pr, MD, PhD

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

More Information

protocol description This link exits the ClinicalTrials.gov site

Publications of Results:

Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, Branchereau A, Moulin T, Becquemin JP, Larrue V, Lievre M, Leys D, Bonneville JF, Watelet J, Pruvo JP, Albucher JF, Viguier A, Piquet P, Garnier P, Viader F, Touze E, Giroud M, Hosseini H, Pillet JC, Favrole P, Neau JP, Ducrocq X; EVA-3S Investigators. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1660-71.

Publications indexed to this study:

Mas JL, Trinquart L, Leys D, Albucher JF, Rousseau H, Viguier A, Bossavy JP, Denis B, Piquet P, Garnier P, Viader F, Touzé E, Julia P, Giroud M, Krause D, Hosseini H, Becquemin JP, Hinzelin G, Houdart E, Hénon H, Neau JP, Bracard S, Onnient Y, Padovani R, Chatellier G; EVA-3S investigators. Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):885-92. Epub 2008 Sep 5.

Study ID Numbers:	P990402, AOM97066
Study First Received:	September 14, 2005
Last Updated:	February 1, 2007
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT00190398
Health Authority:	France: Ministry of Health

Keywords provided by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris:

Prospective
Randomised
Open

Blinded End-point
PROBE Study
Ischemic stroke

Study placed in the following topic categories:

Pathological Conditions, Anatomical
Atherosclerosis
Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Ischemic Attack, Transient
Cerebral Infarction
Stroke
Vascular Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases

Constriction, Pathologic
Ischemia
Arteriosclerosis
Brain Diseases
Cerebrovascular Disorders
Carotid Stenosis
Brain Ischemia
Carotid Artery Diseases

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Nervous System Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on January 16, 2009