MODS Archives – January 2005
Couldnt finish! Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
Couldnt finish! Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
(79 lines)
From:
Barzilai Spinak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:46:03 -0200
Getting MADS back on track
Getting MADS back on track
(64 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:18:21 -0500
I'm stupid Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
I'm stupid Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
(24 lines)
From:
Barzilai Spinak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:01:06 -0200
Language coding (WAS Re: [MODS] New MADS draft, January 13)
Language coding (WAS Re: [MODS] New MADS draft, January 13)
(136 lines)
From:
Rebecca S. Guenther <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:26:30 -0500
MADS bug report
Re: MADS bug report
(25 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:20:35 -0500
merits of a type library
merits of a type library
(76 lines)
From:
Rebecca S. Guenther <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:11:15 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(52 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:41:22 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(36 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:11:23 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(48 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:40:03 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(26 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:49:39 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(27 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:10:09 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(61 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:12:08 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(55 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:36:44 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(67 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:27:11 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(35 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:06:25 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(67 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:59:13 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(62 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:17:05 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(18 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:20:51 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(74 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:46:53 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(36 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:44:38 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(32 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:24:41 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(42 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:52:43 -0500
Re: merits of a type library
(21 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:18:50 -0500
MODS and Atom?
MODS and Atom?
(28 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:32:43 -0500
Re: MODS and Atom?
(23 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:53:57 -0500
MODS part
MODS part
(43 lines)
From:
Rebecca S. Guenther <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:26:01 -0500
Re: MODS part
(67 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:51:39 -0500
Re: MODS part
(30 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:52:46 -0500
Re: MODS part
(49 lines)
From:
Karen Coyle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:56:48 -0800
Re: MODS part
(108 lines)
From:
Ruth Bogan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:09:43 -0500
Re: MODS part
(39 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:39:43 -0500
Re: MODS part
(77 lines)
From:
Mike Rylander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:39:21 +0000
Re: MODS part
(122 lines)
From:
Rebecca S. Guenther <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:57:28 -0500
Re: MODS part
(31 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:07:30 -0500
Re: MODS part
(62 lines)
From:
Karen Coyle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:18:49 -0800
Re: MODS part
(79 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:34:22 -0500
Re: MODS part
(60 lines)
From:
Mike Rylander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:35:52 +0000
Re: MODS part
(39 lines)
From:
Mike Rylander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:08:23 +0000
Re: MODS part
(78 lines)
From:
Rebecca S. Guenther <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:02:01 -0500
Re: MODS part
(44 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:12:18 -0500
Re: MODS part
(25 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:16:28 -0500
Re: MODS part
(82 lines)
From:
Mike Rylander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:54:07 +0000
Re: MODS part
(73 lines)
From:
Dick Thaxter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:54:31 -0500
Re: MODS part
(39 lines)
From:
Mike Rylander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:01:18 +0000
Re: MODS part
(42 lines)
From:
Ruth Bogan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:20:13 -0500
Re: MODS part
(63 lines)
From:
Rebecca S. Guenther <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:40:44 -0500
Re: MODS part
(32 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:09:40 -0500
Re: MODS part
(118 lines)
From:
Mike Rylander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:41:49 +0000
Re: MODS part
(164 lines)
From:
Karen Coyle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:33:48 -0800
MODS part
(81 lines)
From:
Mike Rylander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:49:32 +0000
Re: MODS part
(62 lines)
From:
Dick Thaxter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:10:20 -0500
Re: MODS part
(145 lines)
From:
Dick Thaxter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:17:48 -0500
Re: MODS part
(111 lines)
From:
Dick Thaxter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:11:24 -0500
Re: MODS part
(163 lines)
From:
Mike Rylander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:15:57 +0000
Re: MODS part
(119 lines)
From:
Mike Rylander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 16:20:06 +0000
New MADS draft, January 13
New MADS draft, January 13
(34 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:27:00 -0500
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
(33 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:45:35 -0500
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
(20 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:43:24 -0500
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
(28 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:46:48 -0500
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
(26 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:31:25 -0500
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
(57 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:13:52 -0500
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
(73 lines)
From:
Rebecca S. Guenther <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:43:30 -0500
Re: New MADS draft, January 13
(96 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:57:13 -0500
On what system does MODS run?
On what system does MODS run?
(59 lines)
From:
Bill Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:35:10 -0600
Re: On what system does MODS run?
(23 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:07:58 -0500
Re: On what system does MODS run?
(37 lines)
From:
Rebecca S. Guenther <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:48:06 -0500
Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
(26 lines)
From:
Barzilai Spinak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 01:12:41 -0200
Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
(23 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 22:39:09 -0500
Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
(51 lines)
From:
Barzilai Spinak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 02:16:06 -0200
Re: Please disregard Re: Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
(34 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 23:42:24 -0500
purpose of a type library
purpose of a type library
(40 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:03:03 -0500
Re: purpose of a type library
(58 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:11:49 -0500
RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
(115 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:42:03 -0500
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
(50 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:16:05 -0500
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
(24 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:26:19 -0500
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
(85 lines)
From:
Karen Coyle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:44:55 -0800
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
(44 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:56:31 -0500
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
(45 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 21:01:34 -0500
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
(56 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:30:35 -0500
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
(78 lines)
From:
Barbara B Tillett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:18:23 -0500
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
(98 lines)
From:
Rebecca S. Guenther <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:48:17 -0500
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
(33 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:00:11 -0500
Re: RELAX NG vs. XML Schema, and alternative MADS suggestion
(73 lines)
From:
Diane Hillmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:44:00 -0500
Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
Schema for 3.0 doesn't import xml namespace!!
(72 lines)
From:
Barzilai Spinak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 00:24:47 -0200
Schema validation
Schema validation
(38 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:56:30 -0500
Type library and unqualified local elements
Type library and unqualified local elements
(67 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:36:54 -0500
Unifying MODS and MADS namespace
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace
(29 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:51:52 -0500
Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
(24 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:59:50 -0500
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
(42 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:26:46 -0500
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
(34 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:33:49 -0500
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
(24 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:41:23 -0500
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
(42 lines)
From:
Andrew E Switala <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:47:46 -0500
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
(39 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:55:01 -0500
Re: Unifying MODS and MADS namespace (Re: [MODS] merits of a type library)
(30 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:30:00 -0500
Using the <extension> element
Using the <extension> element
(80 lines)
From:
Ruth Bogan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:49:28 -0500
Re: Using the <extension> element
(123 lines)
From:
Riley, Jenn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:33:05 -0500
Re: Using the <extension> element
(148 lines)
From:
Ruth Bogan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:00:24 -0500
why is mods allowed as root?
why is mods allowed as root?
(18 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:59:37 -0500
Re: why is mods allowed as root?
(24 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:02:35 -0500
Re: why is mods allowed as root?
(32 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:16:20 -0500
Re: why is mods allowed as root?
(42 lines)
From:
Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:08:37 -0500
Re: why is mods allowed as root?
(121 lines)
From:
Nathan L Trail <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:24:19 -0500
Re: why is mods allowed as root?
(121 lines)
From:
Nathan L Trail <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:24:19 -0500
Re: why is mods allowed as root?
(22 lines)
From:
Bruce D'Arcus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:37:01 -0500
Back to the main MODS page
LISTSERV.LOC.GOV