Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
Xelox (Xeloda + Oxaliplatin) and Avastin for Metastatic Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma (XAGastric)
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by Duke University, August 2008
Sponsors and Collaborators: Duke University
Hoffmann-La Roche
Sanofi-Aventis
Genentech
Information provided by: Duke University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00447330
  Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the progression free survival of Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab in previously untreated metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinomas


Condition Intervention Phase
Esophageal Neoplasms
Stomach Neoplasms
Neoplasm Metastasis
Drug: capecitabine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab
Phase II

MedlinePlus related topics: Cancer Esophageal Cancer Esophagus Disorders Stomach Cancer
Drug Information available for: Capecitabine Bevacizumab Oxaliplatin
U.S. FDA Resources
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Non-Randomized, Open Label, Historical Control, Single Group Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Official Title: A Phase ll Study of Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine, and Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Esophagogastric Adenocarcinomas

Further study details as provided by Duke University:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • To evaluate the progression free survival (PFS) of the combination of bevacizumab, oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with previously untreated metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma [ Time Frame: 2+ years from study start date ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • To assess the safety and tolerability of the combination of bevacizumab, oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with previously untreated metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma [ Time Frame: Every 21 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • To assess response rate (RR) in patients treated with the combination [ Time Frame: Every 9 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • To preliminarily assess overall survival (OS) in patients treated with the combination [ Time Frame: 2 years after study start date ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • To evaluate the effect of the combination therapy on blood based biomarkers of angiogenesis. [ Time Frame: Biomarker cycle days 1 and 8 and 15 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • To assess the effect of the bevacizumab monotherapy on tumor and wound angiogenesis, using Immunoblotting, ELISA, and mRNA expression analyses. [ Time Frame: 2 years after study start date ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 37
Study Start Date: February 2007
Estimated Study Completion Date: December 2010
Estimated Primary Completion Date: December 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
1: Experimental Drug: capecitabine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab

Capecitabine will be administered orally at a twice daily dose of 850 mg/m2 (equivalent to a total daily dose of 1700 mg/m2) given days 1-14 of the three week cycle.

Oxaliplatin will be administered at the dose of 130 mg/m2 given as a 2-hour intravenous infusion on day 1 of a three week cycle.

Bevacizumab will be administered at a dose of 15 mg/kg given as a 30-90 minute intravenous infusion on day 1 of a three week cycle following the administration of oxaliplatin.


Detailed Description:

The number of new cases of esophageal and gastric cancers in the United States in 2005 is 14520 for esophageal cancer and 21860 for gastric cancer. Unfortunately, esophageal and gastric cancers will also account for 13570 and 11550 deaths, respectively, in 2005. The 5 year survival rates for metastatic gastroesophageal, GE junctional, and gastric cancers are less than 5%. The major current treatment modality for patients with advanced esophageal, GE junctional, and gastric adenocarcinomas is systemic chemotherapy.

We seek to investigate the efficacy of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in combination with bevacizumab as first line treatment for metastatic esophagogastric cancers. The choice of capecitabine and oxaliplatin is made to develop a user-friendly biologically-based regimen, offering patients oral capecitabine in place of continuous 5FU infusion pumps. Since capecitabine can be given crushed this regimen may both be active and user-friendly. Preliminary data in colorectal cancer suggest that the regimen of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab has comparable activity to FOLFOX-bevacizumab. The goal of the proposed regimen is to define a capecitabine and oxaliplatin-based regimen that optimizes biological approaches over cytotoxic approaches. The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, and metastatic breast cancer has shown to improve response rates and overall survival. If active, this regimen could serve as a first line comparator to the capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and epirubicin combination. This approach will also help to simplify regimen development across gastrointestinal cancers.

In addition to the primary efficacy endpoint of this protocol, several correlative endpoints will also be examined in an exploratory manner. The importance of developing blood-based and tumor biomarkers has been extensively reviewed. However, the role of such predictive markers has not been well studied for XELOX-A. This information is important since it may help define which populations are most likely to benefit and most likely to suffer significant toxicity from this important GI cancer regimen. This biomarker approach may also help understand and define mechanisms of sensitivity, resistance, and toxicity that may be used to guide future hypothesis-driven studies designed to improve the efficacy and safety of this regimen. The correlative biomarker endpoints include serum, plasma and urine biomarkers (e.g. VEGF and bFGF), a wound healing model of angiogenesis, and tumor biopsy studies .

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically documented and radiographically measurable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or stomach that is metastatic/recurrent and not amenable to potentially curative treatment
  • No prior therapy for metastatic disease
  • Normal Organ and marrow function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable or poorly controlled hypertension >150/100 mm Hg
  • Arterial thromboembolic events within 6 months
  • Clinically significant uncontrolled cardiac disease
  • Significant proteinuria at baseline.
  • Grade 2 or greater peripheral neuropathy
  • History of abdominal fistula, GI perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within 6 months.
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00447330

Contacts
Contact: Amy D Franklin, BA 919-668-6701 Amy.Franklin@duke.edu
Contact: Anthony Amara, MSW 668-1861 Anthony.Amara@duke.edu

Locations
United States, North Carolina
Duke University Medical Center Recruiting
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
Contact: Anthony H Amara, MSW     919-668-1861     anthony.amara@duke.edu    
Principal Investigator: Hope E Uronis, MD            
University of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Active, not recruiting
Winston Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157-0001
United States, Tennessee
Sarah Cannon Research Institute Recruiting
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Sub-Investigator: Johanna C Bendell, MD            
Sponsors and Collaborators
Duke University
Hoffmann-La Roche
Sanofi-Aventis
Genentech
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Hope E Uronis, MD Duke University
  More Information

Publications:
Jemal, A., et al., Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005. 55(1): p. 10-30.
Bollschweiler E, Wolfgarten E, Gutschow C, Holscher AH. Demographic variations in the rising incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in white males. Cancer. 2001 Aug 1;92(3):549-55.
Wijnhoven BP, Siersema PD, Hop WC, van Dekken H, Tilanus HW. Adenocarcinomas of the distal oesophagus and gastric cardia are one clinical entity. Rotterdam Oesophageal Tumour Study Group. Br J Surg. 1999 Apr;86(4):529-35.
Glimelius B, Ekstrom K, Hoffman K, Graf W, Sjoden PO, Haglund U, Svensson C, Enander LK, Linne T, Sellstrom H, Heuman R. Randomized comparison between chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 1997 Feb;8(2):163-8.
Hsu CH, Yeh KH, Chen LT, Liu JM, Jan CM, Lin JT, Chen YC, Cheng AL. Weekly 24-hour infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of advanced gastric cancers. An effective and low-toxic regimen for patients with poor general condition. Oncology. 1997 Jul-Aug;54(4):275-80.
Leichman L, McDonald B, Dindogru A, Samson M, Vaitkevicius VK. Cisplatin. An active drug in the treatment of disseminated gastric cancer. Cancer. 1984 Jan 1;53(1):18-22.
Webb A, Cunningham D, Scarffe JH, Harper P, Norman A, Joffe JK, Hughes M, Mansi J, Findlay M, Hill A, Oates J, Nicolson M, Hickish T, O'Brien M, Iveson T, Watson M, Underhill C, Wardley A, Meehan M. Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jan;15(1):261-7.
Miwa M, Ura M, Nishida M, Sawada N, Ishikawa T, Mori K, Shimma N, Umeda I, Ishitsuka H. Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue. Eur J Cancer. 1998 Jul;34(8):1274-81.
Schuller J, Cassidy J, Dumont E, Roos B, Durston S, Banken L, Utoh M, Mori K, Weidekamm E, Reigner B. Preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor following oral administration to colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2000;45(4):291-7.
Hong YS, Song SY, Lee SI, Chung HC, Choi SH, Noh SH, Park JN, Han JY, Kang JH, Lee KS, Cho JY. A phase II trial of capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004 Sep;15(9):1344-7.
Koizumi W, Saigenji K, Ujiie S, Terashima M, Sakata Y, Taguchi T; Clinical Study Group of Capecitabine. A pilot phase II study of capecitabine in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Oncology. 2003;64(3):232-6.
Kim TW, Kang YK, Ahn JH, Chang HM, Yook JH, Oh ST, Kim BS, Lee JS. Phase II study of capecitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002 Dec;13(12):1893-8.
Evans TR, Pentheroudakis G, Paul J, McInnes A, Blackie R, Raby N, Morrison R, Fullarton GM, Soukop M, McDonald AC. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin in patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2002 Sep;13(9):1469-78.
Al-Batran SE, Atmaca A, Hegewisch-Becker S, Jaeger D, Hahnfeld S, Rummel MJ, Seipelt G, Rost A, Orth J, Knuth A, Jaeger E. Phase II trial of biweekly infusional fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Feb 15;22(4):658-63.
Louvet C, Andre T, Tigaud JM, Gamelin E, Douillard JY, Brunet R, Francois E, Jacob JH, Levoir D, Taamma A, Rougier P, Cvitkovic E, de Gramont A. Phase II study of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Dec 1;20(23):4543-8.
Diaz-Rubio E, Evans TR, Tabemero J, Cassidy J, Sastre J, Eatock M, Bisset D, Regueiro P, Baselga J. Capecitabine (Xeloda) in combination with oxaliplatin: a phase I, dose-escalation study in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Ann Oncol. 2002 Apr;13(4):558-65.
Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Twelves C, Brunet R, Butts C, Conroy T, Debraud F, Figer A, Grossmann J, Sawada N, Schoffski P, Sobrero A, Van Cutsem E, Diaz-Rubio E. XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin): active first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 1;22(11):2084-91.
Shields AF, Zalupski MM, Marshall JL, Meropol NJ. Treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma with oxaliplatin and capecitabine: a phase II trial. Cancer. 2004 Feb 1;100(3):531-7.
de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, Homerin M, Hmissi A, Cassidy J, Boni C, Cortes-Funes H, Cervantes A, Freyer G, Papamichael D, Le Bail N, Louvet C, Hendler D, de Braud F, Wilson C, Morvan F, Bonetti A. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(16):2938-47.
Sumpter, K., et al. Randomised, mulitcenter phase III study comparing capecitabine with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin with cisplatin in patients with advanced oesophagogastric cancer: confirmation of dose escalation. in Proc Am Soc Clin Onocol. 2003.
Chong G, Cunningham D. Can cisplatin and infused 5-fluorouracil be replaced by oxaliplatin and capecitabine in the treatment of advanced oesophagogastric cancer? The REAL 2 trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2005 Apr;17(2):79-80. No abstract available.
Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, Berlin J, Baron A, Griffing S, Holmgren E, Ferrara N, Fyfe G, Rogers B, Ross R, Kabbinavar F. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23):2335-42.
Miller, K.D., et al. E2100: A randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel versus paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first line threapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. in American Society for Clinical Oncology. 2005. Orlando, FL.
Goldberg, R.M., et al. N9741: oxaliplatin (Oxal) or CPT-11 + 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV) or oxal + CPT-11 in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Updated efficacy and quality of life (QOL) data from an intergroup study. in Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003.
Takimoto CH, Remick SC, Sharma S, Mani S, Ramanathan RK, Doroshow J, Hamilton A, Mulkerin D, Graham M, Lockwood GF, Ivy P, Egorin M, Schuler B, Greenslade D, Goetz A, Knight R, Thomas R, Monahan BP, Dahut W, Grem JL; National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group Study. Dose-escalating and pharmacological study of oxaliplatin in adult cancer patients with impaired renal function: a National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2664-72.
Ishitsuka, H., T. Ishikawa, and Y. Fukase. Capecitabine and the dThdPase up-regulators IFN-gamma or taxol showed synergistic activity in human cancer xenografts. in Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res. 1996.
Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, Berlin J, Baron A, Griffing S, Holmgren E, Ferrara N, Fyfe G, Rogers B, Ross R, Kabbinavar F. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23):2335-42.
Poon RT, Fan ST, Wong J. Clinical implications of circulating angiogenic factors in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 15;19(4):1207-25. Review.
Lockhart AC, Braun RD, Yu D, Ross JR, Dewhirst MW, Klitzman B, Yuan F, Grichnik JM, Proia AD, Conway DA, Mann G, Hurwitz HI. A clinical model of dermal wound angiogenesis. Wound Repair Regen. 2003 Jul-Aug;11(4):306-13.
Lockhart AC, Braun RD, Yu D, Ross JR, Dewhirst MW, Humphrey JS, Thompson S, Williams KM, Klitzman B, Yuan F, Grichnik JM, Proia AD, Conway DA, Hurwitz HI. Reduction of wound angiogenesis in patients treated with BMS-275291, a broad spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Feb;9(2):586-93.
Lockhart AC, Braun RD, Yu D, Ross JR, Dewhirst MW, Humphrey JS, Thompson S, Williams KM, Klitzman B, Yuan F, Grichnik JM, Proia AD, Conway DA, Hurwitz HI. Reduction of wound angiogenesis in patients treated with BMS-275291, a broad spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Feb;9(2):586-93.
Hurwitz, H., S.N. Holden, and S.G. Eckhardt, Clinical evaluation of ZD6474, an orally active inhibitor of VEGF signaling in patients with solid tumors. Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2002. 21: p. Abstract 325.
Chang HY, Sneddon JB, Alizadeh AA, Sood R, West RB, Montgomery K, Chi JT, van de Rijn M, Botstein D, Brown PO. Gene expression signature of fibroblast serum response predicts human cancer progression: similarities between tumors and wounds. PLoS Biol. 2004 Feb;2(2):E7. Epub 2004 Jan 13.
Gerber HP, Kowalski J, Sherman D, Eberhard DA, Ferrara N. Complete inhibition of rhabdomyosarcoma xenograft growth and neovascularization requires blockade of both tumor and host vascular endothelial growth factor. Cancer Res. 2000 Nov 15;60(22):6253-8.
Kim ES, Serur A, Huang J, Manley CA, McCrudden KW, Frischer JS, Soffer SZ, Ring L, New T, Zabski S, Rudge JS, Holash J, Yancopoulos GD, Kandel JJ, Yamashiro DJ. Potent VEGF blockade causes regression of coopted vessels in a model of neuroblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):11399-404. Epub 2002 Aug 12.
Brookmeyer, R. and J.J. Crowley, A confidence interval for the median survival time. Biometrics, 1982. 38: p. 29-41.

Responsible Party: Duke University Medical Center ( Hope E. Uronis, MD )
Study ID Numbers: 8797
Study First Received: March 13, 2007
Last Updated: August 13, 2008
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00447330  
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration

Keywords provided by Duke University:
metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinomas
ESOPHAGEAL CANCER
GASTRIC CANCER
ADENOCARCINOMA
TARGTED THERAPY
BEVACIZUMAB
CAPECITBAINE
OXALIPLATIN
METASTATIC

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Capecitabine
Digestive System Neoplasms
Esophageal disorder
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Esophageal Neoplasms
Stomach cancer
Bevacizumab
Carcinoma
Oxaliplatin
Digestive System Diseases
Stomach Diseases
Stomach Neoplasms
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Neoplasm Metastasis
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
Esophageal Diseases
Adenocarcinoma
Esophageal neoplasm
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Antimetabolites
Neoplasms by Histologic Type
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Antineoplastic Agents
Growth Substances
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
Pharmacologic Actions
Neoplasms
Neoplastic Processes
Neoplasms by Site
Pathologic Processes
Therapeutic Uses
Growth Inhibitors
Angiogenesis Modulating Agents

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on January 16, 2009