Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
A Study of Two Methods of Determining When to Begin or Change Anti-HIV Treatment
This study has been terminated.
Sponsored by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Information provided by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00001069
  Purpose

PRIMARY: To compare the clinical efficacy of two decision making strategies for initiating or changing antiretroviral therapy: decision making based on current clinical practice alone (i.e., initiating or changing therapy based on CD4 count decline and/or clinical progression) versus decision making based on plasma HIV RNA quantitation in addition to current clinical practice.

SECONDARY: To evaluate toxicity, biological markers, and patient management in the two arms.

Although changing therapies is a common strategy in the treatment of HIV disease, guidelines are needed to help clinicians and patients decide when a change in antiretroviral therapy is indicated. The technology of measuring HIV RNA in plasma has been suggested as a tool for monitoring clinical drug efficacy. However, uncertainty remains about whether aggressive antiretroviral treatment to lower HIV RNA and maintain low levels for as long as possible will confer clinical benefit in comparison with management based on monitoring CD4 counts and HIV-related symptoms.


Condition
HIV Infections

MedlinePlus related topics: AIDS
U.S. FDA Resources
Study Type: Observational
Study Design: Natural History
Official Title: A Randomized Study of the Clinical Effects of Initiating or Changing Antiretroviral Therapy Based on Plasma HIV RNA Quantitation Compared With Initiating or Changing Therapy Based on Current Clinical Practice Alone

Further study details as provided by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID):

Estimated Enrollment: 1100
Detailed Description:

Although changing therapies is a common strategy in the treatment of HIV disease, guidelines are needed to help clinicians and patients decide when a change in antiretroviral therapy is indicated. The technology of measuring HIV RNA in plasma has been suggested as a tool for monitoring clinical drug efficacy. However, uncertainty remains about whether aggressive antiretroviral treatment to lower HIV RNA and maintain low levels for as long as possible will confer clinical benefit in comparison with management based on monitoring CD4 counts and HIV-related symptoms.

Patients are randomized to a decision making strategy for initiating or changing therapy based on current clinical practice alone vs. decision making based on plasma HIV RNA quantitation in addition to current clinical practice in patients with <= 300 CD4+ cells/mm3. All patients in the RNA arm as well as a subset (n = 183) of those in the CCP arm will have a plasma HIV RNA quantitation drawn every 4 months. The results of these quantitations will be blinded until the end of the study. CD4 counts will be obtained at least every 4 months if the previous count was > 20 cells/mm3. The remaining patients in the CCP arm will have CD4 counts obtained according to their clinicians' current clinical practices. Medications, clinical status, and changes in antiretroviral therapy will be recorded for all patients in the study. Patients are stratified by CD4+ cell count (<100 cells/mm3 [200 patients] vs. 100-300 cells/mm3 [900 patients]).

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   13 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Patients must have:

  • HIV infection.
  • CD4 count <= 300 cells/mm3.
  • NO stage 2 or worse AIDS dementia complex.
  • Life expectancy of at least 6 months.
  • Reasonably good health.
  • age >= 13yrs.
  • signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

Co-existing Condition:

Patients with the following symptoms or conditions are excluded:

  • Disorders or conditions that may prevent adequate compliance with study requirements.

Patients with the following prior conditions are excluded:

  • Stage 2 >= AIDS dementia complex.
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00001069

Locations
United States, California
Community Consortium of San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States, 94110
United States, Colorado
Denver CPCRA / Denver Public Hlth
Denver, Colorado, United States, 802044507
United States, District of Columbia
Veterans Administration Med Ctr / Regional AIDS Program
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20422
United States, Georgia
AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
United States, Illinois
AIDS Research Alliance - Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60657
United States, Louisiana
Louisiana Comm AIDS Rsch Prog / Tulane Univ Med
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
United States, Maryland
Baltimore Trials
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
United States, Michigan
Henry Ford Hosp
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
Comprehensive AIDS Alliance of Detroit
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
United States, New Jersey
North Jersey Community Research Initiative
Newark, New Jersey, United States, 071032842
Southern New Jersey AIDS Cln Trials / Dept of Med
Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103
United States, New Mexico
Partners Research
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 871315271
United States, New York
Harlem AIDS Treatment Group / Harlem Hosp Ctr
New York, New York, United States, 10037
United States, Oregon
Portland Veterans Adm Med Ctr / Rsch & Education Grp
Portland, Oregon, United States, 972109951
The Research and Education Group
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97210
United States, Pennsylvania
Philadelphia FIGHT
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
United States, Virginia
Richmond AIDS Consortium
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
Sponsors and Collaborators
Investigators
Study Chair: Thompson M
Study Chair: Perez G
  More Information

Publications:
Doepel LK. Volunteers needed for study of HIV viral load test. NIAID AIDS Agenda. 1995 Dec;:3. No abstract available.
James JS. Viral load: new "strategy" trial in 15 U.S. cities. AIDS Treat News. 1995 Oct 20;(no 233):1-3. No abstract available.
Raghavan S, Grant LB, Barisch G, Thompson M, Williams B, Matoe N, el-Sadr WM. Change in log10 HIV RNA and protease inhibitor use associated with weight change in HIV+ men in a national clinical trial. Int Conf AIDS. 1998;12:556 (abstract no 32180)

Study ID Numbers: CPCRA 036
Study First Received: November 2, 1999
Last Updated: June 23, 2005
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00001069  
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government

Keywords provided by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID):
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
AIDS-Related Complex
Antiviral Agents
Decision Making
Physician's Practice Patterns

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Virus Diseases
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral
HIV Infections
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
AIDS-Related Complex
Retroviridae Infections
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
RNA Virus Infections
Slow Virus Diseases
Immune System Diseases
Lentivirus Infections
Infection

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on January 15, 2009