Full Text View  
  Tabular View  
  Contacts and Locations  
  No Study Results Posted  
  Related Studies  
Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED)
This study has been completed.
Sponsored by: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Information provided by: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000566
  Purpose

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of two major, widely used technologies, radionuclear imaging (ventilation-perfusion scanning) and pulmonary angiography, for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.


Condition Intervention Phase
Lung Diseases
Pulmonary Embolism
Procedure: ventilation-perfusion ratio
Procedure: angiography
Phase III

MedlinePlus related topics: Pulmonary Embolism
U.S. FDA Resources
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Diagnostic

Further study details as provided by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI):

Study Start Date: September 1983
Estimated Study Completion Date: December 1989
Detailed Description:

BACKGROUND:

In 1983, reliable data on the incidence of pulmonary embolism in the adult population and in groups identified at risk were not available because the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic procedures had not been determined. Estimates suggested there were about half a million episodes of pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients each year in the United States. Deaths attributable to pulmonary embolism would be expected in about one third of these patients if left untreated.

The clinical diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was subject to a high frequency of false positives and false negatives. The most definitive diagnostic procedure was pulmonary angiography, an invasive, expensive procedure which was not without risk. It required specialized equipment and highly trained personnel both for performance and for interpretation. Therefore, it was used to diagnose pulmonary embolism only in the major medical centers. Another technique utilized as a method to diagnose pulmonary embolism involved a combination of perfusion and ventilation scanning; this method was only minimally invasive. A normal perfusion scan was thought to be of considerable value because it essentially excluded the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. In selected patient populations, abnormal perfusion scans combined with normal ventilation scans were of substantial help in diagnosis.

Although there had been no acceptable validation of the use of perfusion scans in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, thousands of patients had been evaluated for pulmonary embolism based on perfusion scanning often using methods of imaging now considered to be inadequate. In the early 1980s, clinical practice interpreted a negative perfusion scan as overwhelming evidence against the presence of pulmonary emboli. This interpretation had not been adequately tested either in a prospective study or by long-term follow-up of patients to determine clinical outcome. With regards to positive perfusion scans, there were data to suggest that as many as two-thirds of positive perfusion scans could not subsequently be confirmed by pulmonary angiography. Prospective studies in which timely angiograms using selective injections and improved imaging techniques were needed to evaluate the usefulness of positive perfusion scans.

Phase I was initiated in September 1983. Protocols developed during Phase I underwent independent assessment review in April 1984 and were reviewed and approved by the May 1984 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council. Recruitment and intervention started in January 1985 and ended in September 1986. Follow-up was completed on September 30, 1987.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

Patients suspected of pulmonary embolism underwent a ventilation-perfusion scan. Patients with an abnormal perfusion scan underwent angiography. All patients were followed for one year.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 75 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Men and women suspected of having a pulmonary embolism and who met the criteria to undergo angiography.

  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00000566

Sponsors and Collaborators
Investigators
Investigator: Abass Alavi University of Pennsylvania
Investigator: Richard Greenspan Yale University
Investigator: Charles Hales Massachusetts General Hospital
Investigator: Herbert Saltzman Duke University
Investigator: Paul Stein Henry Ford Hospital
Investigator: John Weg University of Michigan
  More Information

Publications:
Henry JW, Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Raskob GE. Pulmonary embolism among patients with a nearly normal ventilation/perfusion lung scan. Chest. 1996 Aug;110(2):395-8.
Gottschalk A, Stein PD, Henry JW, Relyea B. Can pulmonary angiography be limited to the most suspicious side if the contralateral side appears normal on the ventilation/perfusion lung scan? Data from PIOPED. Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis. Chest. 1996 Aug;110(2):392-4.
[No authors listed] Tissue plasminogen activator for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. A collaborative study by the PIOPED Investigators. Chest. 1990 Mar;97(3):528-33.
[No authors listed] Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED Investigators. JAMA. 1990 May 23-30;263(20):2753-9.
Bone RC. Ventilation/perfusion scan in pulmonary embolism. 'The Emperor is incompletely attired'. JAMA. 1990 May 23-30;263(20):2794-5. No abstract available.
Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Saltzman HA, Terrin ML. Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Nov 15;18(6):1452-7.
Stein PD, Alavi A, Gottschalk A, Hales CA, Saltzman HA, Vreim CE, Weg JG. Usefulness of noninvasive diagnostic tools for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with a normal chest radiograph. Am J Cardiol. 1991 May 15;67(13):1117-20.
Stein PD, Coleman RE, Gottschalk A, Saltzman HA, Terrin ML, Weg JG. Diagnostic utility of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in acute pulmonary embolism is not diminished by pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease. Chest. 1991 Sep;100(3):604-6.
Stein PD, Terrin ML, Hales CA, Palevsky HI, Saltzman HA, Thompson BT, Weg JG. Clinical, laboratory, roentgenographic, and electrocardiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease. Chest. 1991 Sep;100(3):598-603.
Stein PD, Saltzman HA, Weg JG. Clinical characteristics of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 1991 Dec 15;68(17):1723-4. No abstract available.
Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Greenspan RH, Henry JW. Relation of plain chest radiographic findings to pulmonary arterial pressure and arterial blood oxygen levels in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Feb 1;69(4):394-6.
Carson JL, Kelley MA, Duff A, Weg JG, Fulkerson WJ, Palevsky HI, Schwartz JS, Thompson BT, Popovich J Jr, Hobbins TE, et al. The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 1992 May 7;326(19):1240-5.
Quinn DA, Thompson BT, Terrin ML, Thrall JH, Athanasoulis CA, McKusick KA, Stein PD, Hales CA. A prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism in women and men. JAMA. 1992 Oct 7;268(13):1689-96.

Study ID Numbers: 204
Study First Received: October 27, 1999
Last Updated: June 23, 2005
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000566  
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government

Study placed in the following topic categories:
Embolism and Thrombosis
Pulmonary Embolism
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Embolism
Lung Diseases
Vascular Diseases
Thrombosis

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Cardiovascular Diseases

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on January 15, 2009