[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 21, Volume 5]
[Revised as of April 1, 2001]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 21CFR314.125]

[Page 149-150]
 
                        TITLE 21--FOOD AND DRUGS
 
CHAPTER I--FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 
                           SERVICES--Continued
 
PART 314--APPLICATIONS FOR FDA APPROVAL TO MARKET A NEW DRUG--Table of Contents
 
   Subpart D--FDA Action on Applications and Abbreviated Applications
 
Sec. 314.125  Refusal to approve an application.

    (a) The Food and Drug Administration will refuse to approve the 
application and for a new drug give the applicant written notice of an 
opportunity for a hearing under Sec. 314.200 on the question of whether 
there are grounds for denying approval of the application under section 
505(d) of the act, if:
    (1) FDA sends the applicant an approvable or a not approvable letter 
under Sec. 314.110 or Sec. 314.120;
    (2) The applicant requests an opportunity for hearing for a new drug 
on the question of whether the application is approvable; and
    (3) FDA finds that any of the reasons given in paragraph (b) of this 
section apply.
    (b) FDA may refuse to approve an application for any of the 
following reasons:
    (1) The methods to be used in, and the facilities and controls used 
for, the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of the drug 
substance or the drug product are inadequate to preserve its identity, 
strength, quality, purity, stability, and bioavailability.
    (2) The investigations required under section 505(b) of the act do 
not include adequate tests by all methods reasonably applicable to show 
whether or not the drug is safe for use under the conditions prescribed, 
recommended, or suggested in its proposed labeling.
    (3) The results of the tests show that the drug is unsafe for use 
under the conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in its 
proposed labeling or the results do not show that the drug product is 
safe for use under those conditions.
    (4) There is insufficient information about the drug to determine 
whether the product is safe for use under the conditions prescribed, 
recommended, or suggested in its proposed labeling.
    (5) There is a lack of substantial evidence consisting of adequate 
and well-controlled investigations, as defined in Sec. 314.126, that the 
drug product will have the effect it purports or is represented to have 
under the conditions of use prescribed, recommended, or suggested in its 
proposed labeling.
    (6) The proposed labeling is false or misleading in any particular.
    (7) The application contains an untrue statement of a material fact.
    (8) The drug product's proposed labeling does not comply with the 
requirements for labels and labeling in part 201.
    (9) The application does not contain bioavailability or 
bioequivalence data required under part 320 of this chapter.
    (10) A reason given in a letter refusing to file the application 
under Sec. 314.101(d), if the deficiency is not corrected.
    (11) The drug will be manufactured or processed in whole or in part 
in an establishment that is not registered and not exempt from 
registration under section 510 of the act and part 207.
    (12) The applicant does not permit a properly authorized officer or 
employee of the Department of Health and Human Services an adequate 
opportunity to inspect the facilities, controls, and any records 
relevant to the application.
    (13) The methods to be used in, and the facilities and controls used 
for, the

[[Page 150]]

manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of the drug substance or 
the drug product do not comply with the current good manufacturing 
practice regulations in parts 210 and 211.
    (14) The application does not contain an explanation of the omission 
of a report of any investigation of the drug product sponsored by the 
applicant, or an explanation of the omission of other information about 
the drug pertinent to an evaluation of the application that is received 
or otherwise obtained by the applicant from any source.
    (15) A nonclinical laboratory study that is described in the 
application and that is essential to show that the drug is safe for use 
under the conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in its 
proposed labeling was not conducted in compliance with the good 
laboratory practice regulations in part 58 of this chapter and no reason 
for the noncompliance is provided or, if it is, the differences between 
the practices used in conducting the study and the good laboratory 
practice regulations do not support the validity of the study.
    (16) Any clinical investigation involving human subjects described 
in the application, subject to the institutional review board 
regulations in part 58 of this chapter or informed consent regulations 
in part 50 of this chapter, was not conducted in compliance with those 
regulations such that the rights or safety of human subjects were not 
adequately protected.
    (17) The applicant or contract research organization that conducted 
a bioavailability or bioequivalence study described in Sec. 320.38 or 
Sec. 320.63 of this chapter that is contained in the application refuses 
to permit an inspection of facilities or records relevant to the study 
by a properly authorized officer or employee of the Department of Health 
and Human Services or refuses to submit reserve samples of the drug 
products used in the study when requested by FDA.
    (18) For a new drug, the application failed to contain the patent 
information required by section 505(b)(1) of the act.
    (c) For drugs intended to treat life-threatening or severely-
debilitating illnesses that are developed in accordance with 
Secs. 312.80 through 312.88 of this chapter, the criteria contained in 
paragraphs (b) (3), (4), and (5) of this section shall be applied 
according to the considerations contained in Sec. 312.84 of this 
chapter.

[50 FR 7493, Feb. 22, 1985, as amended at 53 FR 41524, Oct. 21, 1988; 57 
FR 17991, Apr. 28, 1992; 58 FR 25926, Apr. 28, 1993; 64 FR 402, Jan. 5, 
1999]