|
8.
|
Has your agency used any of the above tools or incentives (listed in question 7) since January 1, 2000? | ||
| (CHECK ONLY ONE ANSWER) | |||
| 1. | Yes--> (Please continue) | ||
| 2. | No (Click here to go to Question 13.) | ||
| 3. | No answer (Click here to go to Question 13.) | ||
|
9.
|
For the tools or incentives that have been checked as available and used since January 1, 2000 (in question 7), how effective, if at all, have they been at preserving HUD affordable rental housing units? |
| (CHECK ONE FOR EACH TOOL OR INCENTIVE.) |
| Not applicable-not used since January 1, 2000 | Slightly or not effective | Somewhat effective | Moderately effective | Very effective | Extremely effective | No answer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9a. states
|
Limitations on rent increases when owners leave HUD programs | |||||||
| 9b. states
|
State or local use restrictions beyond those required by HUD | |||||||
| 9c. states
|
Stricter state or local notification requirements beyond those required by HUD | |||||||
| 9d. states
|
State or local right of first refusal to match a private offer to purchase a property | |||||||
| 9e. states
|
Preemptive purchase rights to give prospective purchasers an exclusive opportunity to make an offer | |||||||
| 9f. states
|
Nine percent tax credit set aside in Qualified Application Plans | |||||||
| 9g. states
|
Nine percent tax credit preference in Qualified Allocation Plans | |||||||
| Not applicable-not used since January 1, 2000 | Slightly or not effective | Somewhat effective | Moderately effective | Very effective | Extremely effective | No answer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9h. states
|
HOME funds | |||||||
| 9i. states
|
CDBG funds | |||||||
| 9j. states
|
Tax exempt bonds with 4 percent tax credit | |||||||
| 9k. states
|
FHA risk-sharing mortgages | |||||||
| 9l. states
|
State/local revenues - from housing trust funds | |||||||
| 9m. states
|
State/local revenues - deferred loans | |||||||
| 9n. states
|
State/local revenues - grants | |||||||
| 9o. states
|
State or local refinancing programs | |||||||
| Not applicable-not used since January 1, 2000 | Slightly or not effective | Somewhat effective | Moderately effective | Very effective | Extremely effective | No answer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9p. states
|
Property tax exemptions or relief | |||||||
| 9q. states
|
Financing for nonprofits acquiring properties | |||||||
| 9r. states
|
State or local rental assistance to existing or former HUD tenants when owners leave the program | |||||||
| 9s. states
|
Other tools or incentives (Please describe below) | |||||||
|
|
If you checked "other," please describe the other tools and incentives that had the greatest effect on preserving HUD affordable housing units below. |
|
10.
|
What are the reason(s) you believe the tools or incentives that you checked in question 9 have or have not been effective in preserving HUD's affordable housing units. |
|
11.
|
Please provide us with any examples where the tools or incentives have preserved HUD's affordable housing units. |
|
12.
|
About how many, if any, HUD affordable housing units has your agency preserved since January 1, 2000? (PLEASE ENTER AS "00,000".) |
|