[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 5, Volume 1, Parts 1 to 699]
[Revised as of January 1, 2001]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 5CFR351.701]

[Page 256-258]
 
                    TITLE 5--ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL
 
                CHAPTER I--OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
 
PART 351--REDUCTION IN FORCE--Table of Contents
 
             Subpart G--Assignment Rights (Bump and Retreat)
 
Sec. 351.701  Assignment involving displacement.


    (a) General. When a group I or II competitive service employee with 
a current annual performance rating of record of minimally successful 
(Level 2) or equivalent, or higher, is released from a competitive 
level, an agency shall offer assignment, rather than furlough or 
separate, in accordance with paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this 
section to another competitive position which requires no reduction, or 
the lease possible reduction, in representative rate. The employee must 
be qualified for the offered position. The offered position shall be in 
the same competitive area, last at least 3 months, and have the same 
type of work schedule (e.g., full-time, part-time, intermittent, or 
seasonal) as the position from which the employee is released. Upon 
accepting an offer of assignment, or displacing another employee under 
this part, an employee retains the same status and tenure in the new 
position. The promotion potential

[[Page 257]]

of the offered position is not a consideration in determining an 
employee's right of assignment.
    (b) Lower subgroup--bumping. A released employee shall be assigned 
in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section and bump to a position 
that:
    (1) Is held by another employee in a lower tenure group or in a 
lower subgroup within the same tenure group; and
    (2) Is no more than three grades (or appropriate grade intervals or 
equivalent) below the position from which the employee was released.
    (c) Same subgroup-retreating. A released employee shall be assigned 
in accordance with paragraphs (a) and (d) of this section and retreat to 
a position that:
    (1) Is held by another employee with lower retention standing in the 
same tenure group and subgroup; and
    (2) Is not more than three grades (or appropriate grade intervals or 
equivalent) below the position from which the employee was released, 
except that for a preference eligible employee with a compensable 
service-connected disability of 30 percent or more the limit is five 
grades (or appropriate grade intervals or equivalent). (The agency uses 
the grade progression of only the released employee's position of record 
to determine the applicable grades (or appropriate grade intervals or 
equivalent) of the employee's retreat right. The agency does not 
consider the grade progression of the position to which the employee has 
a retreat right.); and
    (3) Is the same position, or an essentially identical position, 
formerly held by the released employee on a permanent basis as a 
competing employee in a Federal agency (i.e., when held by the released 
employee in an executive, legislative, or judicial branch agency, the 
position would have been placed in tenure groups I, II, or III, or 
equivalent). In determining whether a position is essentially identical, 
the determination is based on the competitive level criteria found in 
Sec. 351.403, but not necessarily in regard to the respective grade, 
classification series, type of work schedule, or type of service, of the 
two positions.
    (d) Limitation. An employee with a current annual performance rating 
of record of minimally successful (Level 2) or equivalent may be 
assigned under paragraph (c) of this section only to a position held by 
another employee with a current annual performance rating of record no 
higher than minimally successful (Level 2) or equivalent.
    (e) Pay rates. (1) The determination of equivalent grade intervals 
shall be based on a comparison of representative rates.
    (2) Each employee's assignment rights shall be determined on the 
basis of the pay rates in effect on the date of issuance of specific 
reduction-in-force notices, except that when it is officially known on 
the date of issuance of notices that new pay rates have been approved 
and will become effective by the effective date of the reduction in 
force, assignment rights shall be determined on the basis of the new pay 
rates.
    (f)(1) In determining applicable grades (or grade intervals) under 
Secs. 351.701(b)(2) and 351.701(c)(2), the agency uses the grade 
progression of the released employee's position of record to determine 
the grade (or interval) limits of the employee's assignment rights.
    (2) For positions covered by the General Schedule, the agency must 
determine whether a one-grade, two-grade, or mixed grade interval 
progression is applicable to the position of the released employee.
    (3) For positions not covered by the General Schedule, the agency 
must determine the normal line of progression for each occupational 
series and grade level to determine the grade (or interval) limits of 
the released employee's assignment rights. If the agency determines that 
there is no normal line of progression for an occupational series and 
grade level, the agency provides the released employee with assignment 
rights to positions within three actual grades lower on a one-grade 
basis. The normal line of progression may include positions in different 
pay systems.
    (4) For positions where no grade structure exists, the agency 
determines a line of progression for each occupation and pay rate, and 
provides assignment rights to positions within three grades (or 
intervals) lower on that basis.

[[Page 258]]

    (5) If the released employee holds a position that is less than 
three grades above the lowest grade in the applicable classification 
system (e.g., the employee holds a GS-2 position), the agency provides 
the released employee with assignment rights up to three actual grades 
lower on a one-grade basis in other pay systems.

[51 FR 319, Jan. 3, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 65417, Dec. 17, 1991; 60 
FR 3063, Jan. 13, 1995; 60 FR 44254, Aug. 25, 1995; 62 FR 62502, Nov. 
24, 1997; 63 FR 32594, June 15, 1998; 65 FR 62991, Oct. 20, 2000]