[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 29, Volume 3]

[Revised as of July 1, 2006]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 29CFR825.702]



[Page 793-795]

 

                             TITLE 29--LABOR

 

         CHAPTER V--WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

 

PART 825_THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT OF 1993--Table of Contents

 

    Subpart G_How Do Other Laws, Employer Practices, and Collective 

        Bargaining Agreements Affect Employee Rights Under FMLA?

 

Sec.  825.702  How does FMLA affect Federal and State anti-discrimination 

laws?



    (a) Nothing in FMLA modifies or affects any Federal or State law 

prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, religion, color, 

national origin, sex, age, or disability (e.g., Title VII of the Civil 

Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act). 

FMLA's legislative history explains that FMLA is ``not intended to 

modify or affect the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, the 

regulations concerning employment which have been promulgated pursuant 

to that statute, or the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or the 

regulations issued under that act. Thus, the leave provisions of the 

[FMLA] are wholly distinct from the reasonable accommodation obligations 

of employers covered under the [ADA], employers who receive Federal 

financial assistance, employers who contract with the Federal 

government, or the Federal government itself. The purpose of the FMLA is 

to make leave available to eligible employees and employers within its 

coverage, and not to limit already existing rights and protection.'' S. 

Rep. No. 3, 103d Cong., 1st Sess. 38 (1993). An employer must therefore 

provide leave under whichever statutory provision provides the greater 

rights to employees. When an employer violates both FMLA and a 

discrimination law, an employee may be able to recover under either or 

both statutes (double relief may not be awarded for the same loss; when 

remedies coincide a claimant may be allowed to utilize whichever avenue 

of relief is desired (Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 567 F.2d 429, 

445 (D.C. Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 (1978))).

    (b) If an employee is a qualified individual with a disability 

within the meaning of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the 

employer must make reasonable accommodations, etc., barring undue 

hardship, in accordance with the ADA. At the same time, the employer 

must afford an employee his or her FMLA rights. ADA's ``disability'' and 

FMLA's ``serious health condition'' are different concepts, and must be 

analyzed separately. FMLA entitles eligible employees to 12 weeks of 

leave in any 12-month period, whereas the ADA allows an indeterminate 

amount of leave, barring undue hardship, as a reasonable accommodation. 

FMLA requires employers to maintain employees' group health plan 

coverage during FMLA leave on the same conditions as coverage would have 

been provided if the employee had been continuously employed during the 

leave period, whereas ADA does not require maintenance of health 

insurance unless other employees receive health insurance during leave 

under the same circumstances.



[[Page 794]]



    (c)(1) A reasonable accommodation under the ADA might be 

accomplished by providing an individual with a disability with a part-

time job with no health benefits, assuming the employer did not 

ordinarily provide health insurance for part-time employees. However, 

FMLA would permit an employee to work a reduced leave schedule until the 

equivalent of 12 workweeks of leave were used, with group health 

benefits maintained during this period. FMLA permits an employer to 

temporarily transfer an employee who is taking leave intermittently or 

on a reduced leave schedule to an alternative position, whereas the ADA 

allows an accommodation of reassignment to an equivalent, vacant 

position only if the employee cannot perform the essential functions of 

the employee's present position and an accommodation is not possible in 

the employee's present position, or an accommodation in the employee's 

present position would cause an undue hardship. The examples in the 

following paragraphs of this section demonstrate how the two laws would 

interact with respect to a qualified individual with a disability.

    (2) A qualified individual with a disability who is also an 

``eligible employee'' entitled to FMLA leave requests 10 weeks of 

medical leave as a reasonable accommodation, which the employer grants 

because it is not an undue hardship. The employer advises the employee 

that the 10 weeks of leave is also being designated as FMLA leave and 

will count towards the employee's FMLA leave entitlement. This 

designation does not prevent the parties from also treating the leave as 

a reasonable accommodation and reinstating the employee into the same 

job, as required by the ADA, rather than an equivalent position under 

FMLA, if that is the greater right available to the employee. At the 

same time, the employee would be entitled under FMLA to have the 

employer maintain group health plan coverage during the leave, as that 

requirement provides the greater right to the employee.

    (3) If the same employee needed to work part-time (a reduced leave 

schedule) after returning to his or her same job, the employee would 

still be entitled under FMLA to have group health plan coverage 

maintained for the remainder of the two-week equivalent of FMLA leave 

entitlement, notwithstanding an employer policy that part-time employees 

do not receive health insurance. This employee would be entitled under 

the ADA to reasonable accommodations to enable the employee to perform 

the essential functions of the part-time position. In addition, because 

the employee is working a part-time schedule as a reasonable 

accommodation, the employee would be shielded from FMLA's provision for 

temporary assignment to a different alternative position. Once the 

employee has exhausted his or her remaining FMLA leave entitlement while 

working the reduced (part-time) schedule, if the employee is a qualified 

individual with a disability, and if the employee is unable to return to 

the same full-time position at that time, the employee might continue to 

work part-time as a reasonable accommodation, barring undue hardship; 

the employee would then be entitled to only those employment benefits 

ordinarily provided by the employer to part-time employees.

    (4) At the end of the FMLA leave entitlement, an employer is 

required under FMLA to reinstate the employee in the same or an 

equivalent position, with equivalent pay and benefits, to that which the 

employee held when leave commenced. The employer's FMLA obligations 

would be satisfied if the employer offered the employee an equivalent 

full-time position. If the employee were unable to perform the essential 

functions of that equivalent position even with reasonable 

accommodation, because of a disability, the ADA may require the employer 

to make a reasonable accommodation at that time by allowing the employee 

to work part-time or by reassigning the employee to a vacant position, 

barring undue hardship.

    (d)(1) If FMLA entitles an employee to leave, an employer may not, 

in lieu of FMLA leave entitlement, require an employee to take a job 

with a reasonable accommodation. However, ADA may require that an 

employer offer an employee the opportunity to take such a position. An 

employer may not change the essential functions of the



[[Page 795]]



job in order to deny FMLA leave. See Sec.  825.220(b).

    (2) An employee may be on a workers' compensation absence due to an 

on-the-job injury or illness which also qualifies as a serious health 

condition under FMLA. The workers' compensation absence and FMLA leave 

may run concurrently (subject to proper notice and designation by the 

employer). At some point the health care provider providing medical care 

pursuant to the workers' compensation injury may certify the employee is 

able to return to work in a ``light duty'' position. If the employer 

offers such a position, the employee is permitted but not required to 

accept the position (see Sec.  825.220(d)). As a result, the employee 

may no longer qualify for payments from the workers' compensation 

benefit plan, but the employee is entitled to continue on unpaid FMLA 

leave either until the employee is able to return to the same or 

equivalent job the employee left or until the 12-week FMLA leave 

entitlement is exhausted. See Sec.  825.207(d)(2). If the employee 

returning from the workers' compensation injury is a qualified 

individual with a disability, he or she will have rights under the ADA.

    (e) If an employer requires certifications of an employee's fitness 

for duty to return to work, as permitted by FMLA under a uniform policy, 

it must comply with the ADA requirement that a fitness for duty physical 

be job-related and consistent with business necessity.

    (f) Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by 

the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, an employer should provide the same 

benefits for women who are pregnant as the employer provides to other 

employees with short-term disabilities. Because Title VII does not 

require employees to be employed for a certain period of time to be 

protected, an employee employed for less than 12 months by the employer 

(and, therefore, not an ``eligible'' employee under FMLA) may not be 

denied maternity leave if the employer normally provides short-term 

disability benefits to employees with the same tenure who are 

experiencing other short-term disabilities.

    (g) For further information on Federal antidiscrimination laws, 

including Title VII and the ADA, individuals are encouraged to contact 

the nearest office of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.



[60 FR 2237, Jan. 6, 1995; 60 FR 16383, Mar. 30, 1995]