[Code of Federal Regulations] [Title 13, Volume 1] [Revised as of January 1, 1999] From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [CITE: 13CFR134.406] [Page 342] ASSISTANCE CHAPTER I--SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION PART 134--RULES OF PROCEDURE GOVERNING CASES BEFORE THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS--Table of Contents Subpart D--Rules of Practice for Appeals Under the 8(a) Program Sec. 134.406 Review of the administrative record. (a) Except as provided in Sec. 134.407, any proceeding conducted under this subpart shall be decided solely on a review of the written administrative record. (b) The Administrative Law Judge's review is limited to determining whether the Agency's determination is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. As long as the Agency's determination is reasonable, the Administrative Law Judge must uphold it on appeal. (c) The administrative record must contain all documents that are relevant to the determination on appeal before the Administrative Law Judge and upon which the SBA decision-maker relied. The administrative record, however, need not contain all documents pertaining to the petitioner. For example, the administrative record in a termination proceeding need not include the Participant's entire business plan file, documents pertaining to specific 8(a) contracts, or the firm's application for participation in the 8(a) BD program if they are unrelated to the termination action. The petitioner may object to the absence of a document, previously submitted to or sent by SBA, which the petitioner believes was erroneously omitted from the administrative record. (d) Where the Agency files its answer to the appeal petition after the date specified in Sec. 134.206, the Administrative Law Judge may decline to consider the answer and base his or her decision solely on a review of the administrative record. (e) The Administrative Law Judge may remand a case to the AA/8(a)BD (or, in the case of a denial of a request for waiver under Sec. 124.515 of this title, to the Administrator) for further consideration if he or she determines that, due to the absence in the written administrative record of the reasons upon which the determination was based, the administrative record is insufficiently complete to decide whether the determination is arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law, or where it is clearly apparent from the record that SBA made an erroneous factual finding (e.g., SBA double counted an asset of an individual claiming disadvantaged status) or a mistake of law (e.g., SBA applied the wrong regulatory provision in evaluating the case). Such a remand will be for a period of 10 working days.