![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
Details in the tables may not add to totals because of rounding. All years in this report are fiscal years, unless otherwise noted. All costs are given in constant fiscal year 1988 dollars, unless otherwise noted. Cover photograph courtesy of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory of Batavia, Illinois. The photograph shows a particle interaction in the 15-foot bubble chamber at Fermilab. |
The Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) is a proposed new particle accelerator, which would advance the state of high-energy physics. The next Congress will be faced with the choice of whether to begin construction of the accelerator, pursue an alternative, or defer the decision until further research reduces current technological uncertainties. In response to a request from the Senate Budget Committee, this special study analyzes the potential risks and benefits of building the SSC. In keeping with the Congressional Budget Office's (CBO) mandate to provide nonpartisan analysis, no recommendations are made.
Philip Webre of CBO's Natural Resources and Commerce Division, assisted
by Kuljeet Kalkat, wrote this report under the supervision of Elliot Schwartz.
Everett M. Ehrlich provided valuable assistance in the initial phases of
the project. Robert Hunter, Director of the Department of Energy's Office
of Energy Research, and Robert Diebold and the Staff of the Department
of Energy's SSC Division provided many helpful suggestions and comments.
The author wishes to thank Norman Blackburne, Judith Bostock, Desiree Di
Mauro, Daniel Kaplan, Leon M. Lederman, Paul Maxwell, David H. Moore, Wolfgang
K. H. Panofsky, Christopher Quigg, Robert L. Riemer, Burton Richter, Benno
Schorr, Robert Siemann, Michael Sieverts, W. Edward Steinmueller, R. William
Thomas, and Stanley Wojcicki for their helpful comments. Amanda Balestrieri
edited the manuscript. Margaret T. Cromartie, Patricia Joy, and Gwen Coleman
typed the many drafts, and Kathryn Quattrone and Nancy H. Brooks prepared
the report for publication.
James L. Blum
Acting Director
October 1988
SUMMARY
I - INTRODUCTION
II - THE SSC AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST
III - BUDGETARY RISKS IN THE SSC PROJECT
IV - CONGRESSIONAL OPTIONS
APPENDIXES
A - Technology Spinoffs from Government Programs
B - Technology Spinoffs from CERN Accelerator Research
C - Cost Increases in DOE Accelerators
GLOSSARY
TABLES | |
S-1. | SSC Budget Estimates |
S-2. | Comparison of Major Future Accelerators |
1. | Construction Costs of High-Energy Physics Facilities Currently Operating in the United States |
2. | Cost Components of Dipole Magnets |
3. | DOE Estimate of the Cost Breakdown for the SSC |
4. | Funding and Cost Profile for the SSC |
5. | SSC Budget Estimates |
6. | Range of Cost Estimates for One Possible Configuration of Detectors for the SSC |
7. | DOE Estimate of Superconducting Magnet Costs |
8. | DOE Estimate of the Cost of Conventional Facilities |
9. | Changes in the Cost of Accelerators |
10. | Comparison of Future Accelerators |
B-1. | Sales to CERN and Non-CERN Markets, by Industrial Category |
C-1. | Changes in the Cost of the Energy Saver Accelerator |
C-2. | Changes in the Cost of the Tevatron Accelerator |
FIGURES | |
1. | Basic Science Budget by Discipline for Selected Fiscal Years |
2. | High-Energy Physics Spending |
3. | Construction Budget as a Percentage of Total Budget for High-Energy Physics |
This document is available in its entirety in PDF.