Expanding Access to Financial Institutions
The Financial Services Committee is responsible for the oversight of
the U.S. banking industry, which is one of the most successful banking
systems in the world. This extensive system includes over 22,000 banks,
thrifts, and credit unions. The Democratic Caucus’s philosophy
toward overseeing financial services combines the goals of ensuring the
soundness of the banking system with a commitment to providing all U.S.
consumers the opportunity to participate in the system while being protected
from abusive lending and information-sharing practices.
Members of the caucus have strived to expand access to basic banking
transaction services by bringing more “unbanked” individuals
into the traditional financial services system. Roughly 10 million Americans
do not have an account with an insured depository institution. These “unbanked” consumers
typically resort to non-traditional providers such as check cashers,
which usually charge larger fees than mainstream institutions. The caucus
pushed to include a provision in pending federal deposit insurance reform
legislation that would give insured depository institutions a discount
on the premium assessments for deposits providing “lifeline” accounts.
Lifeline accounts are free or low-cost savings and checking accounts
for low-income individuals.
To further encourage insured depository institutions to provide lifeline
accounts, Committee Democrats also insisted that the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) study efforts by federally insured banks
and thrifts to address the problem of “unbanked” individuals.
This study would take place every two years.
Democratic members have also insisted that provisions be added to recent
legislation that would require the Federal Reserve Board to conduct annual
surveys of banking services and fees. The survey, which has been conducted
annually, has been a helpful source of information for consumers who
are looking to find the most reasonably priced services.
Protecting Consumers’ Information
The Committee is also responsible for administration of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act (FCRA), which, among other things, gives consumers the
right to know what information is contained in their credit reports and
to dispute any inaccuracies in the information.
Key portions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act are set to expire at the
end of 2003.Several alarming studies have found that a significant percentage
of credit reports contain inaccuracies, which have potential to cause
a denial of credit or the need to pay a higher cost for credit.
Since decisions about access to credit, housing, insurance and employment
are increasingly based on a consumer’s credit record and corresponding
credit score, Democratic members will push for greater transparency of
and accuracy in the use of credit information. The Democratic Caucus
will work to ensure that improper collection, evaluation and distribution
of credit information does not disparately impact people of color, women,
or senior citizens. This effort will also include a review of the growing
use of credit information by non-credit businesses, as in the cases when
insurance companies use credit-based insurance scores to evaluate applicants
and existing policyholders.
Predatory Lending
The extraordinary increase in subprime mortgage lending over the past
decade has made credit and home ownership opportunities available to
millions of consumers who could not qualify for conventional mortgages.
The Democratic Caucus of the Committee has long advocated expanding access
to credit for such consumers and this is a goal the Caucus continues
to pursue. Unfortunately, the rise of subprime lending has also created
what a 2000 Treasury-HUD joint report described as “fertile ground” for
a variety of abusive practices collectively referred to as predatory
lending. In recent years these practices--including deceptive marketing,
undisclosed fee charges, excessive penalties and repeated refinancing
of unaffordable debt–have stripped millions of hard working families
of their equity, their savings and their homes. In geographic areas with
high concentrations of predatory loans, the dreadful practice goes beyond
affecting individual families to devastate entire neighborhoods and undermine
the vitality of surrounding communities.
In 2000, members of the Democratic Caucus sponsored legislation to expand
the protections of the 1994 Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act
(HOEPA) to cover greater numbers of subprime loans and address other
lending abuses. The House Republican leadership refused to consider this
legislation arguing that since “predatory lending” could
not be precisely defined, legislation would not address the problem.
However, community activists turned to the states for action. Beginning
with North Carolina in 1999, at least nine states have enacted comprehensive
statutes or regulations aimed at stopping predatory practices. Other
states have enacted more limited measures addressing specific lending
abuses and state officials nationwide are alerting the public to the
problem of predatory lending and educating consumers to help them avoid
being victimized.
Efforts to enact federal anti-predatory legislation continue. However,
some proposals would preempt all state predatory lending laws and weaken
many current protections in federal law. The Democratic Caucus strongly
opposes these efforts favoring a more balanced response that would enhance
the protections in federal law and preserve the rights of states make
their own consumer protection laws.
Financial Privacy
Committee Democrats were instrumental in drafting and enacting the federal
financial privacy protections that Congress incorporated in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act of 1998. For the first time, all financial institutions were subject
to an “affirmative and continuing obligation” to respect
their customers’ privacy and to protect the security and confidentiality
of their customers’ nonpublic personal information. Consumers gained
important privacy rights including the right to know the information
sharing practices of financial institutions, to restrict institutions
from sharing their private information with unaffiliated parties, and
to prevent sensitive account information from being disclosed for telemarketing.
The Democratic Caucus views the 1998 legislation as only a first step
and has actively sought additional privacy protections to prevent unauthorized
access to individuals’ confidential medical and health information,
to combat financial fraud and identity theft, and to eliminate nuisance
telemarketing. In 2000, Committee Democrats led the effort to pass the
Medical Financial Privacy Protection Act, which would have required a
provider to get a consumer’s advance consent (opt-in) before sharing
his or her personally identifiable health and medical information (including
information about medical-related payments) with any party. Even more
stringent protections were also provided for especially sensitive information,
such as treatment for mental health problems, substance abuse, or sexually
transmitted diseases, as well as genetic information. Although the Financial
Services Committee approved the legislation it was never brought to the
House floor for consideration.
The need for stronger protections to combat identity fraud has also
been a continuing concern of Committee Democrats. The Caucus has created
a special Identity Theft Task Force, chaired by Darlene Hooley (OR),
to study all aspects of the issue and recommend additional provisions
to combat financial fraud and identity theft. Committee Democrats also
strongly support regulatory efforts by the Federal Trade Commission to
create a nationwide Do-Not-Call Registry to permit any consumer, with
a single phone call, to block all unwanted telemarketing calls.