Promoting Safe Work   for Young Workers 



A Community-Based
Approach


A Resource Guide Documenting the Experiences of Three Young Worker Projects


Funding agency:
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Public Health Service
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Cooperative agreement partners:

Massachusetts Department of Public Health and
the Education Development Center, Inc.
Project site: Brockton, Massachusetts

University of California at Berkeley
Labor Occupational Health Program
Project site: Oakland, California

University of California at Los Angeles
Labor Occupational Safety and Health Program
Project site: Los Angeles, California


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service o Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

November 1999

  The Authors


Three community-based young worker projects provided the information in this guide, which summarizes the activities and lessons from these projects.

The University of California at Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program (LOHP) coordinated a project in Oakland, California. Cooperative Agreement Number: U60/CCU912042-02-554.

Diane Bush, Michele González-Arroyo, and Laura Stock

The University of California at Los Angeles Labor Occupational Safety and Health Program (LOSH) coordinated a project in Los Angeles, California. Cooperative Agreement Number: U60/CCU912100-02-554.

Linda Delp

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) and Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC) coordinated a project in Brockton, Massachusetts. Cooperative Agreement Number: U60/CCU112096-01-554.

Christine Miara and Robin Dewey

These projects were the result of a cooperative agreement between the above organizations and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in Cincinnati, Ohio. NIOSH provided both funding and staff to collaborate on the conceptualization and execution of the projects.

Raymond C. Sinclair and María J.
Ortega


Acknowledgments: This publication was produced by NIOSH. This report received partial support from the Children's Safety Network, which is funded by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau of the Health Resources and Services Administration. Editors for this guide were Melissa Burns, Education Development Center, Inc., and Susan E. Feldmann and Jane Weber, NIOSH. The graphic designer of the guide was Donna Wilson, Wilson Design Associates. The graphic and layout editor was Pauline Elliott, NIOSH. We would like to thank the many State and local public health experts and youth program coordinators who carefully reviewed this guide. The cover photographs were reproduced with permission by Earl Dotter.


  Foreword

By the time they are seniors in high school, the majority of United States youth are, or have been, employed for pay outside their homes. Injuries and illnesses are an all too frequent consequence of work; youth are not exempt. In 1997, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that 62 youth—under the age of 18—died from work-related injuries. In addition, an estimated 70,000 youth were treated in emergency departments for work-related injuries based on data from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). NIOSH was instrumental in convening a National Research Council/Institute of Medicine (IOM) panel to review available knowledge on the safety and health implications for working youth and to make recommendations for research and prevention. Among the recommendations in the IOM report, published in November 1998, was:

"A national initiative should be undertaken to develop and provide information and training to reduce the risks and enhance the benefits associated with youth employment."

"Promoting Safe Work for Young Workers" is a step in that direction. It reflects the lessons learned from three NIOSH-funded community-based health education projects on young worker issues. In these projects, occupational health educators worked for three years, in three different communities, to raise the awareness of young worker issues at the community level. In this guide, those educators convey what they learned while working with different community groups including parents, employers, educators, and local media. The guide also provides information about materials that can be modified and used in other communities to meet their own needs.

The welfare of our youth is a community issue. Interest in their occupational health and safety extends well beyond the confines of their workplaces. We have prepared this guide for health professionals, labor groups, educators, employers, and parent groups. Any group can take a leadership position in making young worker issues a priority in their community. This guide will help you take the first steps.

Disclaimer

Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Additional copies of this guide may be obtained while supplies last by contacting:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Publications 4676 Columbia Parkway
Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998
1-800-35-NIOSH (1-800-356-4674)

Fax: (513) 533-8573

www.cdc.gov/niosh/homepage.html

email: pubstaft@cdc.gov

Readers are free to duplicate any and all parts of this publication. However, in accordance with standard publishing practices, NIOSH requires acknowledgment, in print, of any information reproduced.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Raymond C. Sinclair

4676 Columbia Parkway
Mailstop C-10
Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998
(513) 533-8172
RCS1@cdc.gov

Christine Miara
Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC)
55 Chapel St.
Newton, MA 02458-1060
(617) 618-2238

Diane Bush
Labor Occupational Health Program (LOHP)
2223 Fulton St.
4th Floor
Berkeley, CA 94720-5120
(510) 643-2424

Linda Delp
Labor Occupational Safety and Health Program (LOSH)
School of Public Policy and Social Research
6350B Public Policy Building
Box 951478
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1478
(310) 794-5976

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 99-141

  Contents


PREFACE

PROJECT SUMMARIES

THE FACTS ABOUT YOUNG WORKER SAFETY AND HEALTH

STEPS IN COORDINATING A YOUNG WORKER PROJECT WORKING WITH COMMUNITY PARTNERS

RESOURCES

  Preface

This guide is for anyone interested in young workers safety and health issues. It is based on the experiences of three NIOSH-funded community-based young worker projects. Local health departments, school-to-career programs, and occupational safety and health professionals are but a few of the groups with the capacity and mission to initiate a young worker project in their communities or to implement an activity described in this guide. The three projects featured were all based in urban settings. However, many of the approaches can be applied to small towns or rural settings.

In the fall of 1995, as we prepared to launch young worker projects in Brockton, MA, Oakland, CA, and Los Angeles, CA, we wondered how our message would be received. As public health professionals, we were convinced of the need for increased awareness of workplace safety for teens, but we were not sure that others would share our concern. Would community organizers find occupational safety less important than more publicized issues such as substance abuse and violence? Would local businesses recognize the value of having a more informed young workforce? Would teens find the topic boring?

But as community groups greeted our initial efforts with interest and enthusiasm, we quickly discovered that our concerns were unfounded. At the first advisory board meeting in Brockton, for example, representatives of 30 community groups and government agencies stayed on long past adjournment, volunteering services and ideas. In Los Angeles, 100 youth leaders, teens, and parents participated in the first media event, requesting information on everything from child labor laws to sexual harassment in the workplace. At Oakland Technical High School, more youths volunteered as peer leaders than staff could initially accommodate. Clearly, many wanted to address this issue.

Over the course of the projects, we learned several key lessons. The active participation of diverse community members was necessary to develop a comprehensive educational approach to young worker safety and maintain broad-based support. In addition, because representatives of community groups already have full agendas, we realized the importance of demonstrating how young worker safety and health can fit into existing initiatives for healthier youth, safer workplaces, and stronger community coalitions. Finally, we found it necessary to emphasize the value of young worker projects to local businesses and the many members of the community who support their interests. We frequently made the point that insuring the safety and health of teen workers lays the foundation for a better work environment and a more knowledgeable workforce.

This guide outlines the steps we took in planning and carrying out the young worker projects. We invite others with an interest in teen safety to try one or more of the activities in this guide. And we wish you success in improving conditions for working teens in your communities.

Robin Baker
Principal Investigator
UC Berkeley, Labor Occupational Health Program

Marianne Brown
Principal Investigator
UCLA, Labor Occupational Safety and Health Program

Letitia Davis
Co-Principal Investigator
Massachusetts Department of Public Health

Susan Gallagher
Co-Principal Investigator
Education Development Center, Inc.

  Project Summaries

Massachusetts Department of
Public Health (MDPH) and the
Education Development Center,
Inc. (EDC)

Brockton, Massachusetts, located 20 miles south of Boston, was formerly an industrial city whose many factories now stand abandoned. Its current multi-ethnic population of 90,000 has a workforce that is primarily blue collar and service oriented. Brockton has one public high school with 3,000 students and a regional vocational technical school nearby.

The Protecting Young Workers project in Brockton was coordinated by the Occupational Health Surveillance Program of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health in partnership with the Education Development Center, Inc. The project was guided by an active community advisory board consisting of 35 representatives from Greater Brockton high schools, the business community, local community organizations, health care providers, the mayor's office, labor organizations, nearby colleges, youth groups, and the media.

The staff selected Brockton for several reasons. According to workers' compensation data, Brockton has the highest rate of injuries among teen workers in Massachusetts. The public high school has a successful school-to-career program in place with strong ties to local employers on which to build program activities. The demographics of the community reflect national averages, making it a good model for other communities interested in similar projects.

University of California at Berkeley,
Labor Occupational Health Program (LOHP)

The city of Oakland, California is located 7 miles across the Bay from San Francisco. Oakland has a multi-ethnic population of more than 370,000 residents and a multi-faceted employment profile, with jobs in the industrial, service, office/financial, and construction sectors. Oakland Unified School District is a major urban school district with a diverse student population (54% African-American, 19% Asian, 19% Latino, 7% White, and 1% other). It is the sixth largest district in California and has six comprehensive high schools and seven alternative high schools that serve more than 9,300 students.

The Young Worker Project in Oakland was coordinated by the Labor Occupational Health Program (LOHP), a community-service program of the University of California at Berkeley School of Public Health, in partnership with the Oakland School District. The project's advisory committee had 15 active members, representing school district teachers and administration, local job training programs, employers, Cal-OSHA, labor unions, and the PTA.

The Oakland School District was selected because it is a large urban district; because LOHP had existing relationships and had done previous work with key teachers and administrative staff in Oakland; and because the district had a strong commitment to building its school-to-career program based on its twelve existing academy programs.

University of California at Los
Angeles, Labor Occupational Safety
and Health Program (LOSH)

The Los Angeles, California project was in the Vernon-Central area, where well-paying manufacturing jobs were located until the 1980s. The population is Latino and African-American. The existence of sweatshops and an informal economy in Los Angeles make it difficult for both students and adults to find meaningful, safe employment, especially those who are immigrants. Jefferson High School, the site of the young worker project (Jefferson Safety and Health Education Project—Jeff SHEP) has a student population of 3,400, of which almost 90% are Latino.

The Jefferson Safety and Health Education Project was a partnership between UCLA Labor Occupational Safety and Health Program (UCLA-LOSH), Jefferson High School, and Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles. It was directed by a steering committee consisting of representatives from each partner organization and guided by a 15-member advisory board representing the larger community of students, parents, teachers, government agencies, labor unions, youth groups and other community-based organizations.

This community was selected because of the potential to build school-community links. Existing networks were used to provide bilingual education to reach immigrant parents as well as students. Concerned Citizens has developed a network of neighborhood block clubs, and the school provides English and citizenship classes to parents through an adult education program. UCLA-LOSH had collaborated with both organizations on other projects and wanted to begin integrating work-related curriculum into the Los Angeles Unified School District, the largest in California and the second largest in the country, with 49 high schools and 45 continuation schools.

 bar

This page was last updated: January 25, 2000

top table of contents button  advance