[Federal Register: July 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 131)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38951-38954]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08jy08-28]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2008-0422]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones: Central Massachusetts August Swim Events
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing safety zones for two
swimming events in the Captain of the Port Boston zone. This rule is
intended
[[Page 38952]]
to restrict vessels from entering portions of the involved waterways
during the respective events. The safety zones are necessary to protect
participants and vessels from the hazards associated with a swim event.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before August 7, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG-2008-0422 to the Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid duplication, please use only one
of the following methods:
(1) Online: http://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(3) Hand delivery: Room W12-140 on the Ground Floor of the West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is 202-366-9329.
(4) Fax: 202-493-2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Chief Petty Officer Eldridge McFadden at 617-223-3000. If
you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. We have an agreement with the
Department of Transportation (DOT) to use the Docket Management
Facility. Please see DOT's ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2008-0422), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each
comment. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing address,
an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of your document so
that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
You may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail,
fax, or delivery to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES; but please submit your comments and material by only one
means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period. We may change this
proposed rule in view of them.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov at
any time. Enter the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG-2008-0422)
in the Search box, and click ``Go >>.'' You may also visit either the
Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays; or U.S. Coast Guard, Sector Boston, 427 Commercial St,
Boston, MA 02109 between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into
any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Department of
Transportation's Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit http://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that
one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
Temporary safety zones are necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels, participants, and spectators at swimming events. Swim events
pose a significant risk to the public because of the combination of
numerous swimmers, high-speed vessels, and potentially congested
waterways. A safety zone will reduce the risk to the public by
separating swimmers from vessel traffic.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The safety zones established are necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels and people during events in the Captain of the Port Boston area
of responsibility, which may pose a hazard to the public. The safety
zones described in subparagraph (a) for this regulation will be
enforced only immediately before and during the event. The Captain of
the Port Boston will inform the public by all appropriate means
including Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners, and
on-scene Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary units.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Assessment is unnecessary.
The Coast Guard's implementation of these safety zones will be of
short duration and designed to minimize the impact on navigable waters.
These safety zones will only be enforced immediately before and during
the time the swimmers are in the water. Furthermore, these safety zones
have been designed to allow vessels to transit unrestricted to portions
of the waterway not affected by the safety zone. The Coast Guard
expects insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the activation of
this safety zone.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
[[Page 38953]]
The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in the areas designated as safety zones
in subparagraphs (a) during the date and time the safety zones are
being enforced. These safety zones would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the
following reasons: The safety zones in this proposed rule would be in
effect for short periods, and will not preclude vessels from transit
outside the zones.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Chief Petty Officer Eldridge
McFadden at 617-223-3000. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive
5100.1, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is not likely to
have a significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this preliminary
determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
[[Page 38954]]
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T01-0422 to read as follows: Sec.
165.T01-0422 Safety Zones: Central Massachusetts August Swim Events.
(a) Location. The following swim events include safety zones as
described herein:
(1) Plymouth Rock Triathlon, Plymouth Inner Harbor, Plymouth, MA
(i) All waters of Plymouth Inner Harbor, from surface to bottom.
(ii) Effective Date. This rule will be enforced from 7:30 a.m.
through 12:30 p.m. on August 31, 2008.
(2) 30th Annual Celebrate the Clean Harbor Swim, Gloucester Harbor,
Gloucester, MA
(i) All waters of Gloucester Harbor, from surface to bottom, within
the zone marked by two buoys west of Niles Beach.
(ii) Effective Date. This rule will be enforced from 8:30 a.m.
through 12:30 p.m. on August 16, 2008, with a rain date of August 17,
2008 at the same times.
(b) Definition: As used in this section, designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, or any
federal, state, or local law enforcement officer authorized to enforce
this regulation on behalf of the Coat Guard Captain of the Port (COTP).
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into or remaining in the safety
zones described in paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port (COTP), Boston, or
the COTP's designated representative.
(2) Persons desiring to transit within the safety zones established
in this section may contact the Captain of the Port at telephone number
617-223-3008 or via on-scene patrol personnel on VHF channel 16 to seek
permission to do so. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port or his or
her designated representative.
Dated: June 24, 2008.
Gail P. Kulisch,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Boston.
[FR Doc. E8-15388 Filed 7-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P