[Federal Register: August 2, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 147)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 46122-46124]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02au04-18]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05-04-135]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Upper Chesapeake Bay, Patapsco and Severn Rivers, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on portions of the upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries during the
movement of the U.S.S. Constellation. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during the dead ship
tow of the vessel from its berth in Baltimore, Maryland to the United
States Naval Academy seawall in Annapolis, Maryland, and return. This
action will restrict vessel traffic in portions of the Patapsco River
(including the Inner Harbor and the Northwest Harbor), Chesapeake Bay
and Severn River.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before September 16, 2004.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander,
U.S. Coast Guard Activities, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, Building 70,
Waterways Management Branch, Baltimore, Maryland, 21226-1791. Coast
Guard Activities Baltimore, Waterways Management Branch, maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking. Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part of this docket and will be
available for inspection or copying at Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Activities, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, Building 70, Port Safety, Security
and Waterways Management Branch, Baltimore, Maryland 21226-1791 between
8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ron Houck, at Coast Guard
Activities Baltimore, Port Safety, Security and Waterways Management
Branch, at telephone number (410) 576-2674 or (410) 576-2693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD05-04-
135), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to Coast Guard Activities Baltimore,
Waterways Management Branch, at the address under ADDRESSES explaining
why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The U.S.S. Constellation Museum is celebrating the 150th
anniversary of the launch of the U.S.S. Constellation in 2004, and to
commemorate this occasion, is sponsoring a dead ship tow of the
historic sloop-of-war U.S.S. Constellation on October 26, 2004, from
Baltimore, Maryland to Annapolis, Maryland. The event will mark the 23
years that the ship was stationed at the Naval Academy as a training
vessel, from 1871 to 1893. Planned events include an eight-hour dead
ship tow of the U.S.S. Constellation with an onboard salute with navy
pattern cannon while off Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic
Site. A return dead ship tow of the U.S.S. Constellation to Baltimore,
Maryland is expected to occur on November 1, 2004.
The Coast Guard anticipates a large recreational boating fleet
during this event. Operators should expect significant vessel
congestion along the planned route.
The purpose of this rule is to promote maritime safety and protect
participants and the boating public in the Port of Baltimore, in the
approaches to Baltimore Harbor, and the Severn River immediately prior
to, during, and after the scheduled event. The rule will provide for a
clear transit route for the participating vessels, and provide a safety
buffer around the participating vessels while they are in transit. The
rule will impact the movement of all vessels operating in the specified
areas of the upper Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries.
Interference with normal port operations will be kept to the
minimum considered necessary to ensure the safety of life on the
navigable waters immediately before, during, and after the scheduled
event.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The historic sloop-of-war U.S.S. Constellation is scheduled to be
towed ``dead ship'' on October 26, 2004. The U.S.S. Constellation is
scheduled to be towed from its berth at Pier 1, Baltimore, Maryland to
the Naval Academy seawall, Annapolis, Maryland, to take place along a
route of approximately 30 nautical miles one-way, that includes
specified waters of the Patapsco River (including the Inner Harbor and
the Northwest Harbor), Chesapeake Bay and Severn River. On
[[Page 46123]]
November 1, 2004, a dead ship tow of the U.S.S. Constellation to return
to Pier 1, Baltimore, Maryland from the Naval Academy seawall,
Annapolis, Maryland is expected to occur.
The safety of dead ship tow participants requires that persons and
vessels be kept at a safe distance from the intended route during this
evolution. The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary moving
safety zone around the U.S.S. Constellation dead ship tow participants
on October 26, 2004 and on November 1, 2004, to ensure the safety of
participants immediately prior to, during, and following the dead ship
tow.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to operate or anchor in portions of the
Patapsco River (including the Inner Harbor and the Northwest Harbor),
Chesapeake Bay and Severn River, Maryland. Because the zone is of
limited size and duration, it is expected that there would be minimal
disruption to the maritime community. Before the effective period, the
Coast Guard would issue maritime advisories widely available to users
of the river to allow mariners to make alternative plans for transiting
the affected areas. In addition, smaller vessels not constrained by
their draft, which are more likely to be small entities, may transit
around the zone and request permission from the COTP Baltimore on a
case-by-case basis to enter the zone.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency
[[Page 46124]]
provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards
are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials,
performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures;
and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because this rule establishes a safety
zone.
A draft ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a draft
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. Comments on this section will be
considered before we make the final decision on whether the rule should
be categorically excluded from further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T05-135 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-135 Safety Zone; Upper Chesapeake Bay, Patapsco and
Severn Rivers, MD.
(a) Definitions.
Captain of the Port. The Captain of the Port means the Commander,
Coast Guard Activities Baltimore or any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port to act on his behalf.
U.S.S Constellation dead ship tow participants. Includes the U.S.S
Constellation, and its accompanying towing and pre-designated emergency
egress vessels.
(b) Location. The following area is a moving safety zone: all
waters of the Patapsco River (including the Inner Harbor and the
Northwest Harbor), Chesapeake Bay and Severn River, surface to bottom,
within 200 yards ahead of and 100 yards outboard and aft of the
historic sloop-of-war U.S.S Constellation, while operating from
Baltimore, Maryland to Annapolis, Maryland, and return.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons are required to comply with the
general regulations governing safety zones found in Sec. 165.23 of
this part.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through a
safety zone must first request authorization from the Captain of the
Port or his designated representative. The Coast Guard vessels
enforcing this section can be contacted on VHF Marine Band Radio,
channels 13 and 16. The Captain of the Port can be contacted at (410)
576-2693.
(3) No vessel movement is allowed within the safety zone unless
expressly authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 7 a.m.
to 5 p.m. on October 26, 2004, and from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on November 1,
2004.
Dated: July 22, 2004.
Jonathan C. Burton,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Baltimore,
Maryland.
[FR Doc. 04-17529 Filed 7-30-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P