Statement
Senator Christopher "Kit" Bond
May 3, 2001
Senate Committee on Government Affairs
Safeguarding the Vote -- Reforms are needed
Mr.
Chairman. Ranking member Senator Lieberman. My colleague from
Missouri, as well as my other colleagues .... let me begin by
thanking you for allowing me to testify today.
No one wants their state to become the poster
child for a problem. No one wants their home town to become a
laughstock. So it is with much dismay that I come before you
today, to describe what has gone on in St. Louis, what is going
on, and what reforms I believe are vital.
Over the past months many Americans saw for the
first time how actual vote counting is done -- or not done. We
have been given a real-life civics lesson that was as unexpected
as it was frustrating. And now those of us in positions of
responsibility need to fix what needs fixing, reform what needs
reforming, and prosecute where actual wrong-doing has occured.
Voting is the most important duty and
responsibility of a citizen of our republic. It should not be
diluted by fraud, false filings in lawsuits, judges who don’t
follow the law, and politicians who try to profit from the
confusion.
At the same time, voters should not be unduly
confused by complicated ballots and voter rosters, or confounded
by inadequate phone lines or voting booths.
Mr. Chairman, I want to make one simple point as
I begin. Vote fraud is not about partisanship. It is not about
democrats vs. republicans. It is not about the North Side of St.
Louis vs. The South Side.
It is about justice. For vote fraud is a
criminal, not political act. Illegal votes dilute the value of
votes cast legally. When people try and stuff the ballot box,
what they are really doing is trying to steal political power
from those who follow election laws. There can be no graver
example of disenfranchisement.
As the Missouri Court of Appeals recently wrote:
"(E)qual vigilance is required to
ensure that only those entitled to vote are allowed to cast
a ballot. Otherwise, the rights of those lawfully entitled
to vote are inevitably diluted."
And listen to what St. Louis democrats had
to say these past few months:
State Rep Quincy Troupe: "There is no doubt
in any black elected official’s mind that the whole process
has discouraged honest elections in the city of St. Louis for
some time. We know that we have people who cheat in every
election. The only way you can win a close election in this
town, you have to beat the cheat."
St. Louis’s outgoing Mayor Clarence Harmon:
" I think there is ample, longstanding evidence of voter
fraud in our community."
11th Ward Alderman Matt Villa: " Who knows
who did it. But it is apparent they are trying to cheat and
steal this election."
What we have been seeing in St. Louis these past
months has been nothing short of astonishing -- to the degree
that we have become a national laughing-stock.
Dead people and dogs registered by mail. Fake
people registering. Addresses which are vacant lots. Voter rolls
with more names than there are people of voting age.
A City Judge violated state law by providing
extended voter hours for only selected polling places, and
individuals voting with absolutely no record of any
registration.
But we have also discovered in our ongoing
review another major problem in St. Louis --- the voter rolls
are so clogged up with incorrect or fraudulant data that legal
voters are shortchanged.
St. Louis City actually
has more voters listed on its voter rolls than the voting age
population of the city.
This means an over than 100% registration rate ... which is
amazing, but not surprising if the dead are reregistering.
Equally amazing, we also discovered that in the
City of St. Louis one out of every 10 registered voters is also
registered somewhere else in the state!
In fact, over 24,000 people are dual registered
in St. Louis City as well as somewhere else in Missouri. Now I
don’t know how many voted more than once -- but the voter
rolls would have allowed them to do so.
To date my staff has reveiwed 11,826
of these multiple registered names
-
Found 8789 voters who were still
registered in the City, even after moving out and
registering at their new address.
-
Found 335 voters who were actually registered
twice in the City itself.
-
Found 198 voters who were registered
three different places in the state. And two of
these 198 voters were actually registered three
times in St. Louis City.
-
And then found 3 voters who were registered
at four different places in the state.
Thus it is painfully clear that our voter
registration system is broken. And desperately needs repairing.
But as I have said before Mr. Chairman, voter
rolls are a symptom of a larger problem. We have also seen just
about every illegal registration scheme imaginable:
-- Fake addressses
-- Dead people registering
-- People registering from
vacant
lots
-- Fraudulant dual registrations
-- Dogs registering
That’s right -- even dogs are able to register
in St. Louis.A City Grand Jury is now investigating 3800 voter
registration cards dumped on the election Board on the last day
to register before the March 6th primary: press reports note
that at least 1000 were bogus registrations for people already
registered, and of course we have all heard about the cases of
dead public officials being reregistered.
And now a Federal Grand Jury investigation is
underway as the FBI recently issued a subpeona to the St. Louis
City Election Board for all records pertaining to any person who
registered to vote between October 1, 2000 and March 6, 2001. It
also requested all records of anyone who cast absentee ballots
or regular ballots during that period, as well as anyone who was
turned away from the polls and barred from voting.
Mr. Chairman, it is obvious that there has been
brazen fraud with these bogus voter registrations. With dead
people reregistering, fake names, and phony addresses, it is
clear the system is being abused.
And because nearly all of these fraudulant
registrations were the mail-in forms, I would urge the Committee
to look at making real reforms in this area. At a minimum state’s
need to be given the authority to require on the mail
registration form a place for notorization or other form of
authentication. Under current federal law states are actually prohibited
from including this safeguard. This is one obvious place where
the federal law is a clear impediment to anti-fraud efforts.
In addition, election boards need time to review
these cards -- as they are the most likely to be brought in on
the last days of registration. Given what we have just seen the
past months, a same day registration scheme would be an absolute
invitation to fraud.
As the Missouri Court of Appeals wrote when they
shut down the improper efforts to keep only certain polling
places open:
"...(C)ommendable zeal to protect
voting rights must be tempered by the corresponding duty to
protect the integrity of the voting process....(E)qual
vigilance is required to ensure that only those entitled to
vote are allowed to cast a ballot. Otherwise, the rights of
those lawfully entitled to vote are inevitably
diluted."
As I noted earlier, I believe it is our duty to
fix what needs to be fixed, reform what needs to be reformed,
and prosecute where there has been wrong-doing. Criminal
investigations are ongoing, I hope that anyone responsible for
cheating will be caught and punished.
But we must get a handle on the voter rolls.
People who register and follow the rules shouldn’t be
frustrated by inadequate polling places and phone lines or
confused by out-of-date lists. At the same time, we must require
voter lists to be scrubbed and reviewed in a much more timely
manner -- so the cheaters cannot use confusion as their friend.
I certainly don’t want St. Louis to have the
lasting reputation described by my old friend Quincy Troupe:
"The only way you can win a close
election in this town, you have to beat the cheat.".
|