WPCb 2BPZCourier 10cpi#|xAx6X@8;X@HP LaserJet IIIDHPLASIII.PRSx  @,\,BvX@2:2 ZlCourier 10cpiCourier 10cpi (Bold)Courier 10cpi (Italic)HP LaserJet IIIDHPLASIII.PRSx  @,\,BvX@#|x2XF``?xxx,Ax6X@8;X@?xxx,x `B;X?xxx,#Ax6Nh ;XH !&+)$< :(#>:+)]>PE <     X   ?  ORDER LIST FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1993 ORDERS IN PENDING CASES  ?  D-1271 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL TIMOTHY BAILEY It having been reported to the Court that Michael Timothy Bailey, of Portland, Oregon, has resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Oregon and this Court by order of May 24, 1993, having suspended the said Michael Timothy Bailey from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Michael Timothy Bailey be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1272 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GEOFFREY T. WILLIAMS, SR. It having been reported to the Court that Geoffrey T. Williams, Sr., of Fairfax, Virginia, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Virginia and this Court by order of June 14, 1993, having suspended the said Geoffrey T. Williams, Sr. from'0*((Ԍ the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued; It is ordered that the said Geoffrey T. Williams, Sr., be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1276 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM P. TEEVENS It having been reported to the Court that William P. Teevens, of Rapid City, South Dakota, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of North Dakota and this Court by order of June 14, 1993, having suspended the said William P. Teevens from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said William P. Teevens be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. '0*((Ԍ D-1277 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT P. GOLDBERG It having been reported to the Court that Robert P. Goldberg, of Honolulu, Hawaii, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Hawaii and this Court by order of July 22, 1993, having suspended the said Robert P. Goldberg from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued; It is ordered that the said Robert P. Goldberg be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1280 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GEORGE F. WOOD It having been reported to the Court that George F. Wood, of Sanford, Maine, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine and this Court by order of July 22, 1993, having suspended the said George F. Wood from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; '0*((Ԍ It is ordered that the said George F. Wood be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1284 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROGER M. ROSENBERG It having been reported to the Court that Roger M. Rosenberg, of Mineola, New York, has resigned from the practice of law before the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department and this Court by order of July 22, 1993, having suspended the said Roger M. Rosenberg from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Roger M. Rosenberg be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1285 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARC HARVEY SLIFFMAN It having been reported to the Court that Marc Harvey Sliffman, of Wheaton, Maryland, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Court of Appeals of Maryland and this Court by order of July 22, 1993, having suspended the said Marc Harvey Sliffman '0*((Ԍ from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Marc Harvey Sliffman be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1287 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES A. HELINGER, JR. It having been reported to the Court that James A. Helinger, Jr., of Clearwater, Florida, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Florida and this Court by order of July 22, 1993, having suspended the said James A. Helinger, Jr., from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said James A. Helinger, Jr., be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. '0*((Ԍ D-1289 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SHELLEY J. LASHKOWITZ It having been reported to the Court that Shelley J. Lashkowitz, of Denver, Colorado, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of North Dakota and this Court by order of July 22, 1993, having suspended the said Shelley J. Lashkowitz from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Shelley J. Lashkowitz be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1299 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN S. MATTHEWS It is ordered that John S. Matthews, of Tampa, Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1300 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PETER R. STROMER It is ordered that Peter R. Stromer, of San Jose, California, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within '0*((Ԍ forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1301 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN MILTON POHLMANN It is ordered that John Milton Pohlmann, of Lafayette, California, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1302 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LINDA ANTIONETTE WILLIS It is ordered that Linda Antionette Willis, of Cleveland, Ohio, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1303 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL JOSEPH BLAKE It is ordered that Michael Joseph Blake, of Dearborn Heights, Michigan, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1304 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS L. KUMMER It is ordered that Thomas L. Kummer, of Reno, Nevada, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty '0*((Ԍ days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1305 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LOUIS MICHAEL THRASHER It is ordered that Louis Michael Thrasher, of Lincoln, Nebraska, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1306 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN I. ROGERS, III It is ordered that John I. Rogers, III, of Bennettsville, South Carolina, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1307 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HARVEY N. SHENBERG It is ordered that Harvey N. Shenberg, of South Miami, Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1308 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID GOODHART It is ordered that David Goodhart, of Miami, Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be '0*((Ԍ disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1309 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN E. SHANK It is ordered that John E. Shank, of Cross Lanes, West Virginia, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1310 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BERTRAM ZWEIBON It is ordered that Bertram Zweibon, of New York, New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1311 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF OMAR Z. GHOBASHY It is ordered that Omar Z. Ghobashy, of New York, New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1312 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JACOB RABINOWITZ It is ordered that Jacob Rabinowitz, of Brooklyn, New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. ' 0*((Ԍ D-1313 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LEONARD HOWARD RUBIN It is ordered that Leonard Howard Rubin, of Tarrytown, New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1314 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SEYMOUR BROWN It is ordered that Seymour Brown, of New York, New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. 92-74 DEPT. OF REVENUE OF OREGON V. ACF INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. 92-854 CENTRAL BANK OF DENVER V. FIRST INTERSTATE BANK, ET AL. 92-1239 J. E. B. v. T. B. The motions of the Solicitor General for leave to  ?  participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument are granted. 92-97 NORTHWEST AIRLINES, ET AL. V. KENT CTY., MICHIGAN, ET AL. The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to  ?  participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. ' 0*((Ԍ 92-780 NOW, INC., ET AL. V. SCHEIDLER, JOSEPH, ET AL. The motion of Legal Defense for Unborn Children for  ?   leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is denied. The motion of Alan Ernest to allow counsel to represent children unborn and born alive is denied. The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral  ?`  argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted. The motion of respondent Monica Migliorino for divided argument and for additional time for oral argument is denied. 92-1223 DEPT. OF DEFENSE, ET AL. V. FLRA, ET AL. The motion of respondent American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, for leave to file motion for divided argument and for divided argument is denied. 92-1370 BFP V. RTC, RECEIVER OF IMPERIAL The motion of respondents Paul Osborne, et al. for divided argument is granted. 92-1500 CASPARI, SUPT., ET AL. V. BOHLEN, CHRISTOPHER The motion of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation for  ?  leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate  ?  in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted. 92-1639 CHICAGO, ET AL. V. ENVTL. DEFENSE FUND, ET AL. The motion of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted. ' 0*((Ԍ 92-6281 HAGEN, ROBERT V. UTAH The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to  ?   participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted. The motion of Council of State Governments, et al. for leave to file a brief as  ?  amici curiae is granted. 92-8579 ELDER, CHARLES K. V. HOLLOWAY, R. D., ET AL. The motion of American Bar Association for leave to  ?  file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.  ?  ASSIGNMENT ORDER An order of the Chief Justice designating and assigning Justice Powell (Retired) to perform judicial duties in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit during the period from September 27, 1993, through June 10, 1994, and for such time as may be required to complete unfinished business, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 294 (a), is ordered entered on the minutes of this Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 295.